Home  5  Books  5  GBEzine  5  News  5  HelpDesk  5  Register  5  GreenBuilding.co.uk
Not signed in (Sign In)

Categories



Green Building Bible, Fourth Edition
Green Building Bible, fourth edition (both books)
These two books are the perfect starting place to help you get to grips with one of the most vitally important aspects of our society - our homes and living environment.

PLEASE NOTE: A download link for Volume 1 will be sent to you by email and Volume 2 will be sent to you by post as a book.

Buy individually or both books together. Delivery is free!


powered by Surfing Waves




Vanilla 1.0.3 is a product of Lussumo. More Information: Documentation, Community Support.

Welcome to new Forum Visitors
Join the forum now and benefit from discussions with thousands of other green building fans and discounts on Green Building Press publications: Apply now.




    • CommentAuthortony
    • CommentTimeApr 19th 2010
     
    We all know that "they" insist on a 50mm ventilation space above the insulation in many roofs.

    Is this a belt and braces safe gap and 45mm would do?

    What is the minimum gap that would work? and is this dependant on roof pitch, aspect etc?
    • CommentAuthorsinnerboy
    • CommentTimeApr 19th 2010
     
    Good one . I recently had an A shaped attic conversion enlarged to a pitched to front / flat to rear conversion

    115 rafters , bitumenous sarking felt , plasterboard ceiling - no vapour barrier and fibreglass fill was the existing spec - approx 15 years old in Dublin Suburb. Sounds like a recipe for interstitial condenstation leading to rot . ?


    However the rafter timbers were in robust condition - not even a mark on them . I was interested to note that after strip out that remnants of fibreglass had bonded to the felt in a downy fluffy manner - caused during high summer temps melt bonding the insulation to the felt I reckon .

    So why no evidence of condensation ? Probably because there was de facto ventilation caused by wind penetration through the very fabric of the fibreglass fill . Which incidentally would have been knocking the stuffing out of the lambda value all along.
  1.  
    For a roof, with insulation between rafters I beleive iti s about having a minimum surface area of timber exposed to ventilation so as to mitigate any interstitial condensation which may otherwsie occur. In particular for low permeabilty insulations.
    • CommentAuthortony
    • CommentTimeApr 20th 2010
     
    I have seen plenty of examples of fully filled with no problems -- especially W,S and E facing ones

    I used to think -- no or very little air gap -- no moist air as it will all be dry -- so no condensation?
  2.  
    Posted By: tonyI have seen plenty of examples of fully filled with no problems -- especially W,S and E facing ones. I used to think -- no or very little air gap -- no moist air as it will all be dry -- so no condensation?
    I think there is something in this. A number of BBA certificates for warm roof constructions mention not leaving voids, I assume it is for this reason.

    Surrounding the rafters with insulation must make the rafters warmer & any air contained in vapour permeable mineral wool insulation will not be exposed to any rapid changes in temperature, so will not for example, be vulnerable to the morning dew effect.

    I think you either need to build it airtight (with appropriate vapour permeabilities) or you need to ventilate it well. In between doesn't make sense & may just provide an entry path for moist air at times when the structure is still cold from the night before.

    David
    • CommentAuthortony
    • CommentTimeApr 20th 2010
     
    Ah yea but some warm roof constructions also require a 50mm too

    how small can the gap be?
  3.  
    If you are using a breathable membrane you don't need a gap.
    • CommentAuthorsinnerboy
    • CommentTimeApr 20th 2010 edited
     
    Well vapour permeable insulations like fibreglass will leave voids to collect condensate - thereby reducing the insulation performance . What happens to that condensate ? Summer temp cause it to disperse harmlessly ? Winter wind penetration ( un intended ventilation ) will disperse it too - along with thermal performance . So why do calculated U Values so often fail to deliver in real life ?


    Impermeable insulations give the condensate no where to go save into the timbers . Bye bye roof if no vent gap . How big/small ? B Regs 50mm gap is derived from BSI research BS 5250: 2002 Code of practice for control of
    condensation in buildings . I would not care to fly in the face of this research .
  4.  
    Posted By: tonyAh yea but some warm roof constructions also require a 50mm too

    how small can the gap be?
    The ventilation gap in a warm roof construction is above the sarking membrane. This performs a subtely different role. It's not so much removing damp air from the loft or roof void as encouraging vapour to pass through the breathable sarking membrane.

    Some breather membrane BBA certificates rely on the gaps between the roof tiles to dissipate moisture. They don't require eaves or ridge vents. They only require counter battens if the membrane is pulled tight/supported & then only 12mm to ensure liquid water run-off.

    However, I don't see the point of not ventilating the batten cavity. If you're using counter battens anyway because the membrane is pulled tight/supported then you may as well ventilate the batten cavity. It will not increase heat loss by air infiltration of the insulation, it can only reduce the condensation risk & it will help reduce overheating risk by reducing under tile temperatures in summer.

    The BBA certificates for woodfibre sarking boards recommend 25mm continuous ventilation to the eaves & 5mm continuous ventilation to the ridge.

    David
  5.  
    Posted By: sinnerboyWell vapour permeable insulations like fibreglass will leave voids to collect condensate - thereby reducing the insulation performance . What happens to that condensate ? Summer temp cause it to disperse harmlessly ? Winter wind penetration ( un intended ventilation ) will disperse it too - along with thermal performance . So why do calculated U Values so often fail to deliver in real life ?
    If flexible mineral wool is correctly installed then there should be no voids, certainly less than you would get with a rigid insulation board.

    Any void should not collect condensate. During the winter the partial vapour pressure gradient is from inside to outside. So vapour will be driven out of the roof to be dissipated by the breathable sarking membrane. During the summer it will be driven in the other direction towards the inside.

    You cannot rely on unplanned air leakage to dissipate moisture, it could well have the opposite effect. Mineral wool insulation needs to be contained in a windtight box with the right vapour permeability properties. The ventilation needs to be planned to make sure that this box doesn't collect moisture long term.

    David
    •  
      CommentAuthorfostertom
    • CommentTimeApr 20th 2010
     
    If there's liquid condensation somewhere within the sandwich, it will stay as liquid until its temp, and the temp of the air within the sandwich, rises, so evaporation begins. Until evaporation happens, no amount of ventilation will remove it in while liquid state.

    Once evaporated into vapour state, its own partial vapour pressure is perfectly adequate to disperse it away from its own centre of concentration. Air movement is not necessary for that dispersal - it will migrate through still air (or even 'upstream' against an air current).

    So ventilation thro air gap above the insulation is completely pointless and irrelevant, and is based on ignorance or misunderstanding of the partial vapour pressure mechanism. It seems 'common sense' that ventilation will remove moisture, but that's fortuitous, in fact frequently counter productive as it can acusally import more moisture.

    The only purpose of or need for thro ventilation, is if the felt above it is vapour-impermeable - but those days are very long gone. With vapour-open felt, a vent gap between insulation and felt is not only unnecessary, but may be counter productive from the moisture point of view.

    And it will certainly degrade insulation performance, by encouraging wind infiltration into the insulation, and by leaving a large portion of the rafters naked to a super-cooling induced airstream.
    • CommentAuthortony
    • CommentTimeApr 20th 2010
     
    Did you all just say no gap?
  6.  
    Posted By: tonyDid you all just say no gap?
    I said, I don't see the point of NOT ventilating the batten cavity. For a warm roof I would ventilate the batten cavity above the breathable sarking membrane, 25mm to eaves, 5mm to ridge.

    I would use 38mm counter battens because this is greater than the 25mm required to ensure the continuity of the eaves to eaves ventilation & because this allows you to nail fix tiling battens without puncturing the sarking membrane.

    David
    •  
      CommentAuthorfostertom
    • CommentTimeApr 20th 2010
     
    Are we talking about
    a) forming a ventilated gap between top of insulation and underside of an old-style impermeable slating felt, and/or
    b) forming a ventilated gap between top of insulation and underside of a breather slating felt, and/or
    b) no gap above insulation, insulation tight to underside of a breatheable sarking board or breather felt, but a ventilated gap between top of that board/felt and underside of slating felt?
    Please everyone state which you mean.
    • CommentAuthorsinnerboy
    • CommentTimeApr 20th 2010
     
    a) - 50mm required
    b)- no gap required as described - BUT gap advised above breather membrane as in -
    c) - a ventilated gap between top of that board/felt and underside of SLATES/TILES
    •  
      CommentAuthorfostertom
    • CommentTimeApr 20th 2010
     
    Who says c)?

    Glidevale put out some convincing-looking case histories about 6yr ago to that effect, in order to find new market for their plastic ventilator things after breather felt came in. I took it seriously, incorporated in working drawings, the BldgInsp said 'what's that, not required, don't bother', I contacted BRE's boffin expert on air permeability of lapped tiles/slates, who said that even after years of silting up the batten space remains completely vapour-open, even with triple lap shingles. So I left it out and the building's very happy, 270mm of insulation, saw it the other day.
  7.  
    I would say manufacturers literature concurs with Sinnerboy, but I beleive the following to also eliminate the risk of timber degredation resulting from unplanned risks such as minor roof leaks. Thinking mostly of [b][ii]

    a] Agree, this is absolutely essential.
    b] [i] Agree if so called vapour open insulation such as mineral wool.
    b] [ii] Disagree for insulation such as PUR.
    c]Agree for b [i] but not required for [b] [ii]
    •  
      CommentAuthorfostertom
    • CommentTimeApr 20th 2010
     
    So b] [ii] suffers quite a knock in its supposed superior insulation, because it leaves the rafter naked to an induced cold draught - which also creates real danger of condensation within the timber.

    As I asked sinnerboy, where's the authority for c] as far as you're concerned? It must mean that you (or your source of authority) disbelieve
    Posted By: fostertomBRE's boffin expert on air permeability of lapped tiles/slates, who said that even after years of silting up the batten space remains completely vapour-open, even with triple lap shingles
    • CommentAuthorsinnerboy
    • CommentTimeApr 20th 2010
     
    Tom - I do as you did - i.e. the Glidevale boys"got to me"
    • CommentAuthorMike George
    • CommentTimeApr 20th 2010 edited
     
    I don't think there is a risk of condensation in the timbers if a sufficient surface area is left exposed to a vented 50mm gap. If the space between the rafters is fully filled then the risk will increase in the case of a minor roof leak

    I think I may have misunderstood [c]. I just meant that counter battening was necessary where there is no ventilated gap inboard of a breather membrane

    Are you suggesting that some kind of above fascia vent is necessary to ventilate the area above and between counter battens? If so I have not read anything which suggests this is necessary.
    • CommentAuthorsinnerboy
    • CommentTimeApr 20th 2010 edited
     
    Posted By: davidfreeboroughIf flexible mineral wool is correctly installed then there should be no voids, certainly less than you would get with a rigid insulation board.


    Agreed David - I should clarify ;- The fibrous parts of a fibreglass quilt will not absorb moisture . The material is vapour permeable due to the air spaces in between the fibrous parts . It is within these air spaces that condensate will form

    Posted By: davidfreeboroughDuring the winter the partial vapour pressure gradient is from inside to outside. So vapour will be driven out of the roof to be dissipated by the breathable sarking membrane.


    Agreed . But not if the felt is the bitumen based type in this case condensate will form on the felt soffit

    Posted By: davidfreeborough During the summer it will be driven in the other direction towards the inside.


    ..... but will stop at the interface with any vapour check . Or at least be inhibited by it .

    Posted By: davidfreeborough You cannot rely on unplanned air leakage to dissipate moisture,


    100 % agree .

    Posted By: davidfreeborough. Mineral wool insulation needs to be contained in a windtight box with the right vapour permeability properties. The ventilation needs to be planned to make sure that this box doesn't collect moisture long term.


    And yet my Dublin attic ( clients rather ) confounds this . Bitumen felt . Fibreglass pack . No Vapour Barrier . 15 years no damage . I conclude that wind penetration - other wise of course to be detailed out is the probable saviour of this structure over that 15 years - thats all .

    ( By the way if the multi quote nature of this post looks confrontational - it is not intended to be :smile: )
    • CommentAuthorsinnerboy
    • CommentTimeApr 20th 2010 edited
     
    Yikes - that looks awful - sorry all I can't do multi quotes it seems

    EDIT - aha ! I figured how to block quote after all
    •  
      CommentAuthorfostertom
    • CommentTimeApr 20th 2010
     
    This is getting complicated - can we agree that there's no need under any circs to positively thro-vent (eave to ridge) anything above the slating felt, whether it's breatheable or impermeable? That was what Gildevale were pushing
    Posted By: Mike Georgesome kind of above fascia vent is necessary to ventilate the area above and between counter battens
    but AFAIC that was discredited - because the slating batten space is well vapour-open to outside even without actual vent gaps.

    I go back to
    Posted By: fostertomIf there's liquid condensation somewhere within the sandwich, it will stay as liquid until its temp, and the temp of the air within the sandwich, rises, so evaporation begins. Until evaporation happens, no amount of ventilation will remove it in while liquid state.

    Once evaporated into vapour state, its own partial vapour pressure is perfectly adequate to disperse it away from its own centre of concentration. Air movement is not necessary for that dispersal - it will migrate through still air (or even 'upstream' against an air current).

    So ventilation thro air gap above the insulation is completely pointless and irrelevant, and is based on ignorance or misunderstanding of the partial vapour pressure mechanism. It seems 'common sense' that ventilation will remove moisture, but that's fortuitous, in fact frequently counter productive as it can actually import more moisture.
    So I don't think that ventilation helps drying out, even "in the case of a minor roof leak" - temperature rise is the only way that vapourisation can happen, and once there's vapourisation, simple breatheability is is quite sufficient to allow its strong urge to disperse. Ventilation is only necessary is there's not breatheability.

    I'd say the
    Posted By: Mike Georgerisk of condensation in the timbers if a sufficient surface area is left exposed to a vented 50mm gap
    is actually increased because the area of rafter surface left naked to actually a convective draught of cold air is tripled - may increase from one-sixteenth to one quarter of the rafter's surface. So the rafter stays much colder, poss below dew point.
  8.  
    Thats quite a compelling argument Tom.

    It all hinges though on how often the air in any ventilated gap rises above the temperature within the structure that caused any condensate to occur. If it happens often [and I think it does], then clearly rapid ventilation will cause the rate of evaporation to occur faster than if no ventilation is present yes?

    I'm assuming that there is both low and high level ventilation to promote radid airflow.
    And that the effect of solar radiation on the roof surface is sufficient to raise the temperature within any void on most days so as to negate the risk of condensation on increased surface area of rafters.

    Oh, I agree about the Glidevale thing.
    • CommentAuthorsinnerboy
    • CommentTimeApr 20th 2010
     
    ( not going to try multi quote again )

    I don't agree with your opening statement Tom . Glidevale have successfully pushed me . End of AFIAC .
  9.  
    Without wishing to complicate things further, let me re-state the definitions:

    a) forming a ventilated gap between top of insulation and underside of an old-style impermeable slating felt;
    b) forming a ventilated gap between top of insulation and underside of a breathable membrane, [i] vapour open insulation between rafters, [ii] non-vapour open insulation between rafters;
    c) forming a ventilated gap between top of breathable membrane and underside of slates/tiles;
    d) forming a ventilated gap between top of fully supported breathable membrane and underside of slates/tiles, [i] vapour open sarking board, [ii] non-vapour open sarking board.

    I don't know why anyone would use a) for a new build roof.

    Approach b) probably works well with rigid board insulation well sealed to the rafters. However, it makes sense to use the sarking board/membrane to keep the wind out of the insulation, so I would seek to avoid b).

    Approach c) is not required by any breathable membrane BBA certificate I have seen. Counter battens are required if the membrane is pulled tight, but this is to allow liquid water run-off.

    Case d) [i] implies a breathing roof with relatively low vapour resistance, for example, constructions with no internal vapour barrier & woodfibre sarking boards. This brings with it relatively high rates of vapour transfer & a need for ventilation of the batten cavity. For example, the BBA certificates for Isolair woodfibre sarking boards requires 25mm minimum counter battens, 25mm ventilators to the eaves & 5mm ventilators to the ridge.

    Case d) [ii] implies a non-breathing roof with a relatively high vapour resistance insulation over the rafters. Here the rates of vapour transfer are relatively low & can be readily dissipated through the tiles. So all the BBA certificates I've seen do not require any ventilation & instead place their emphasis on having a continuous vapour control barrier internally. Counter battens are required, but this is to allow liquid water run-off.

    David
    •  
      CommentAuthorfostertom
    • CommentTimeApr 20th 2010
     
    When a bit of useful warmth returns on a sunny winter/spring day, the air in the vented gap may actually be colder than the air + radiant temp in the slating battens space. Better surely that the insul is pressed up against a breather membrane/sarking, to receive the batten space heat, than to be isolated from same by an airstream gap.

    Even if the airstream were as warm as the batten space, the only way its convective effect would be more effective than conductive contact, at warming the insulation, would be if that airstream penetrated the surface texture of the insulation (which is important to avoid, by wind barrier). If impenetrable, then convection wd be a poor way of warming the insulatioin up, compared to conductive contact.
    •  
      CommentAuthorfostertom
    • CommentTimeApr 20th 2010
     
    David, what's the difference between your c) and your d)?

    c) and d) [i] seem to support sinnerboy. I'm depressed!

    Posted By: davidfreeboroughApproach b) probably works well with rigid board insulation well sealed to the rafters
    I'd say that b) [i] is main reason why insulation performs disappointingly;
    b) [ii] pretty well guarantees over-20% moisture content in the rafters! Or if not, then only because of v forgiving UK climate compared to N/central Canada/US, where it's warned against, and mid Europe, where Pro-Clima etc comes from.
    • CommentAuthorMike George
    • CommentTimeApr 20th 2010 edited
     
    Posted By: davidfreeboroughWithout wishing to complicate things further, let me re-state the definitions:

    a) forming a ventilated gap between top of insulation and underside of an old-style impermeable slating felt;
    b) forming a ventilated gap between top of insulation and underside of a breathable membrane, [i] vapour open insulation between rafters, [ii] non-vapour open insulation between rafters;
    c) forming a ventilated gap between top of breathable membrane and underside of slates/tiles;
    d) forming a ventilated gap between top of fully supported breathable membrane and underside of slates/tiles, [i] vapour open sarking board, [ii] non-vapour open sarking board.

    I don't know why anyone would use a) for a new build roof.

    Approach b) probably works well with rigid board insulation well sealed to the rafters. However, it makes sense to use the sarking board/membrane to keep the wind out of the insulation, so I would seek to avoid b).

    Approach c) is not required by any breathable membrane BBA certificate I have seen. Counter battens are required if the membrane is pulled tight, but this is to allow liquid water run-off.

    Case d) [i] implies a breathing roof with relatively low vapour resistance, for example, constructions with no internal vapour barrier & woodfibre sarking boards. This brings with it relatively high rates of vapour transfer & a need for ventilation of the batten cavity. For example, the BBA certificates for Isolair woodfibre sarking boards requires 25mm minimum counter battens, 25mm ventilators to the eaves & 5mm ventilators to the ridge.

    Case d) [ii] implies a non-breathing roof with a relatively high vapour resistance insulation over the rafters. Here the rates of vapour transfer are relatively low & can be readily dissipated through the tiles. So all the BBA certificates I've seen do not require any ventilation & instead place their emphasis on having a continuous vapour control barrier internally. Counter battens are required, but this is to allow liquid water run-off.

    David


    I agree with most of that David.

    I say most because:

    I thought the counter battening had some effect on the way in which vapour migrates to the outside air? Also there shouldn't really be any significant volume of water to run off whether membrane pulled tight or not. I'd be interested in reading a BBA which details this if you have a link as like I said it is an assumption [probably wrong] on my part:bigsmile:

    Also I'm unfamiliar with Case [d] [i]
  10.  
    Posted By: Mike GeorgeIt all hinges though on how often the air in any ventilated gap rises above the temperature within the structure that caused any condensate to occur. If it happens often [and I think it does], then clearly rapid ventilation will cause the rate of evaporation to occur faster than if no ventilation is present yes?
    I think this is key. On a clear night the roof's outer surface radiates into space & can drop well below the ambient air temperature. So it tends to collect moisture like a car left out overnight.

    This "coolth" will travel down into the rafters. In the morning, the ventilation air warms relatively quickly, but the relatively massive rafters take much longer. During this period the ventilation air will lead to condensation on or around the rafters. So it makes sense for the ventilation air to be outside the breathable membrane, preventing water contact with the rafters.

    Depending upon the thermal resistances & masses involved it could take many hours for this cycle to reverse. Think of decrement delay, but on the outer surface rather than the inner surface. If you put some thermal resistance around & particularly above the rafters then their temperature will not drop as low, but it will also take longer to increase. So, as with decrement delay, you'll see a reduced amplitude & delayed temperature variation reducing the overall risk of condensation.

    There is another aspect to batten cavity ventilation (between sarking board/membrane & underside of tiles) which could be useful. In the same way that a car port open on all sides stops a car from collecting dew, ventilation of the batten cavity reduces dew formation on the sarking board/membrane.

    By allowing air flow under the tiles it reduces the temperature drop seen by the sarking board/membrane. The tiles drop to a temperature below ambient when exposed to the night sky, but the ventilated cavity reduces the extent to which the sarking board/membrane drop below ambient temperature.

    The other benefit is that it reduces the temperature under the tiles on a summer's day, reducing overheating potential & reducing the extent to which vapour is driven towards the inside & against the vapour barrier (if present).

    David
   
The Ecobuilding Buzz
Site Map    |   Home    |   View Cart    |   Pressroom   |   Business   |   Links   
Logout    

© Green Building Press