Green Building Bible, Fourth Edition |
These two books are the perfect starting place to help you get to grips with one of the most vitally important aspects of our society - our homes and living environment. PLEASE NOTE: A download link for Volume 1 will be sent to you by email and Volume 2 will be sent to you by post as a book. |
Vanilla 1.0.3 is a product of Lussumo. More Information: Documentation, Community Support.
Posted By: djhWhat's the conservation officer's view of the 1920s extension? Does it add to the older building or detract from it? They might allow you more flexibility with it than with the older part.
If it is solid wall with no DPC and was built in the 1920s then it sounds to me more like it was intended as an unheated storeroom or something rather than part of the living accomodation
Posted By: tonyNo battens for me, wood or metal, I would foam on 80mm composite sheets then mechanically fix them with insulation fixings,
Posted By: Nick ParsonsComposite: Probably insulation/plasterboard laminates. Celotex PL4000 (PIR), for example, or Kingspan K118 (phenolic foam). I prefer separate ins and pl'bd so that you can tape the VCL tight before applying the plasterboards. A composite sheet has a VCL between pl'bd and insulation, but where's the VCL on the board joints?
Posted By: tvrulesme
Wood fibre for the bathroom seems to be out given the moisture content of the bathroom so should I just ignore breathability just for the bathroom, get the best extractor fan I can and effectively tank the bathroom with tile backer boards or is there another way?
Posted By: kristevaI seem to remember there was chap in a previous thread who raised the question of using wood fibre board in his bathroom, I think he ended up phoning Steico who told him it was fine. I'm assuming he was aiming for a breathable system.
Posted By: kristevaA good extractor fan is a must in any bathroom of course, and it would be good to be sure the high ground was the cause of the damp.
Posted By: jms452Slightly different to you but we had a solid walled bathroom with horrendous damp.
Plan was to fix it via external wall and mvhr.
mvhr was fitted a year before the external wall and solved the whole thing (i.e. ventilation fully resolved it)
John
Posted By: tvrulesmePosted By: kristevaI seem to remember there was chap in a previous thread who raised the question of using wood fibre board in his bathroom, I think he ended up phoning Steico who told him it was fine. I'm assuming he was aiming for a breathable system.
Thank you, I'm using a lot of Steico elsewhere. Will give them a call. To be honest if this one small part of the house is the only bit which is non breathable I can live with that. I can't really get my head around wood fibre being ok in a humid environment. It's only the glue itself which is impermeable.Posted By: kristevaA good extractor fan is a must in any bathroom of course, and it would be good to be sure the high ground was the cause of the damp.
Absolutely. I'm going to oversize the fan given the damp history. I quite like the sound of the Vent-Axia PureAir Sense with it's continuous use feature.
I've got some time before I'll be ready for the walls so will monitor the damp now the levels outside have been lowered. Gutters looked in good condition so I can't really see what else would be the cause. Nothing else came up on my very extensive survey
Posted By: tvrulesmePosted By: Nick ParsonsComposite: Probably insulation/plasterboard laminates. Celotex PL4000 (PIR), for example, or Kingspan K118 (phenolic foam). I prefer separate ins and pl'bd so that you can tape the VCL tight before applying the plasterboards. A composite sheet has a VCL between pl'bd and insulation, but where's the VCL on the board joints?
Ahh got you. I know that as insulated plasterboard.....
So I think if we're going down the non breathable route I'd rather go for cement board and tile throughout. The plaster I ripped out was wet as hell which wasn't the best advert for me. So leaning towards regular foil backed insulation with the joints taped and cement board on top. Or maybe something like this fixed directly to the walls?
https://www.wetrooms-online.com/products/wedi-tile-backer-insulated-building-board-600mm-width?gclid=CjwKCAjw9e6SBhB2EiwA5myr9vLTh0vjUVp5SteGNa85S0W0KVC0yeQDiDx0g9sPiUfx5KYVWC8C5BoCnpYQAvD_BwE
One issue it won't solve is my wonkey wall seen in picture so I don't think I'm going to be able to get away from using some kind of timber or other support
http:///newforum/extensions/InlineImages/image.php?AttachmentID=8240" alt="IMG_1642.JPG" >
Posted By: JontiAs djh has asked, I would get the CO's take on the extension and whether it compliments or detracts from the original building. If the CO is not so fussed then you may be able to externally insulate and add exterior cladding that is tidy and makes the addition obvious.
Regardless of the above does the listed status prevent you installing a damp proofing?
Posted By: tvrulesmePosted By: jms452Slightly different to you but we had a solid walled bathroom with horrendous damp.
Plan was to fix it via external wall and mvhr.
mvhr was fitted a year before the external wall and solved the whole thing (i.e. ventilation fully resolved it)
John
Nice, which MVHR did you go for? Decentralised or whole house?
1 to 17 of 17