Home  5  Books  5  GBEzine  5  News  5  HelpDesk  5  Register  5  GreenBuilding.co.uk
Not signed in (Sign In)

Categories



Green Building Bible, Fourth Edition
Green Building Bible, fourth edition (both books)
These two books are the perfect starting place to help you get to grips with one of the most vitally important aspects of our society - our homes and living environment.

PLEASE NOTE: A download link for Volume 1 will be sent to you by email and Volume 2 will be sent to you by post as a book.

Buy individually or both books together. Delivery is free!


powered by Surfing Waves




Vanilla 1.0.3 is a product of Lussumo. More Information: Documentation, Community Support.

Welcome to new Forum Visitors
Join the forum now and benefit from discussions with thousands of other green building fans and discounts on Green Building Press publications: Apply now.




    •  
      CommentAuthoragu
    • CommentTimeJan 29th 2008
     
    I have just started a new job in this area of work and am booked to go on a NHER Approved SAP Assessor course shortly, I was wondering if anybody could give me some tips of things I should try to familarise myself with before I go. Bearing in mind I have very little knowledge of U-values, building regs etc will all this be covered does anyone know?

    Thanks
  1.  
    You should get most of what you need to know on the course, but an understanding of buildings, building technology and thermal performance is good.
    •  
      CommentAuthoragu
    • CommentTimeJan 30th 2008
     
    Thanks Nick, fingers crossed I can hold my own
    •  
      CommentAuthorPaulT
    • CommentTimeJan 31st 2008 edited
     
    You should download and read the PArt L1A building regulation and the Domestic Heating guide.
    Time allowing Part F (ventilation)
    All available from the planning portal.

    Also //bre.co.uk/sap2005 for the SAP specification documents.

    Essential to also get is BRE Conventions for U value calculations (2006)

    In my view SAP assessments should not be done by anybody that has not studied these, as a minimum, so please do.
    The NHER training is by far the most comprehensive but does lack enough depth on the above.

    Also, when using SAP it may seem to give reasonalbe results - but it is full of errors and old assumptions about the thermal dynamics of buildings. It uses a simplification of steady state analysis of typical 1970/1980 builds. Lightweight (or very heavyweight) buildings will behave differently.

    - It is important that SAP is only used to check compliance and not as a comprehensive design tool.
    •  
      CommentAuthorOlly
    • CommentTimeFeb 1st 2008
     
    If you want to understand SAP then you could do what I did, which is to build an Excel spreadsheet based upon the SAP worksheets.

    It takes quite a while and you're obviously not allowed to use any results from it as it's not approved software. But it does help to give you an in-depth understanding of how the SAP calculations work and will also help you familiarise yourself with all the methodologies and tables.

    Is a good understanding of building physics and thermal performance not a pre-requisite for going on a SAP assessor course?
  2.  
    ..would love to get my grubby mitts on a SAP xls spreadsheet... any chance Olly..?

    J
  3.  
    There are alternative suppliers to NHER, they are currently many accreditation scheme approved to deliver SAP training and EPC production - my advice would be to try Stroma accreditation Ltd (www.stroma.com).

    They will give the full set of learning material and worked examples – very useful!!

    Stroma also offer other training such as Code For Sustainble Homes (software is excellent and free of charge!!)
  4.  
    For James Norton (or anyone else)
    Have recently found that the insulation people Knauf have a free to use BRE approved SAP 2005 calculator on their website. They encourage printing the results and using it for Building Regulation applications. It is covered in their name though!
    •  
      CommentAuthoragu
    • CommentTimeMar 3rd 2008
     
    Thanks guys I have done the NHER course and now trying to further my knowledge so all of the above is helpful

    Cheers

    Agu
    •  
      CommentAuthorali.gill
    • CommentTimeMar 14th 2008
     
    This is what makes me sick. i've been studying construction part-time for six years on onc/ hnc construction and hnd architectural design and technology course. then along come chumps with no idea attending half arsed short courses so their bosses can send them out to fill in forms the reason for which they have little idea other than it means they get an end of month pay cheque.
    absolute farce. typical we have thousands of media degree students stacking shelves in sainsburys and where a real understanding and dedicated course attendance is needed we send tnuc's on a 2 day course.
    will u-values and building regs be covered ? - oh yeah, about 20 minutes on each should cover it and you'll be out in time to miss the worst of the traffic !!
    good luck agu, maybe you could fill us in on just how much of an understanding you have after your in depth training. and does that mean you can now go out and work up sap assessments and epc's ?
    •  
      CommentAuthorPaulT
    • CommentTimeMar 15th 2008 edited
     
    RE: Use stroma - does Matt work for Stroma?

    From another forum :"If I were more sceptical, I'd almost be tempted to believe you were Stroma's MD ;)."

    Seriously - I have been on a ********** course and I did know more than the examiner and examining body - there were 4 incorrect questions in the exam


    ali - I have to say I agree. Sorry if I insult anybody, but tough! I did an MSc and studied for years. I now find I am going to have to fork out at least £1200 - if BRE agree - to have my expertese recognised; Otherwise I will have to attend a course where I will know more than the tutor!

    What is desperately needed is a recognised, chartered profession of Environmental/Energy consultant and not CIOB dishing out Cenv to 300 existing members - I am prety sure there are not 300 people in the country (yet) who you would regard as having the same professional status in environmental expertese as a fully chartered engineer (for example).

    Even the NHER course, which is the most comprehehnsive is actualy a farce.

    I am constanty being called in by companies who have SAP and air tigheness assessments done on the cheap and then find the so called experts can not help them improve the buildings! This is very harmfull - I met a builder yesterday who wanted to do Code level 3 but has given up - several more buildings going up at minimum spec...

    Rant over...
    • CommentAuthorPeter A
    • CommentTimeMar 15th 2008
     
    Gents, give the guy a break, we all have to start somewhere, I agree that a 3 day course on NHER doesn't give an automatic qualification to be a good SAP assessor but it's a start. I'm sure with the right guidance and two years down the line he'll make a good assessor, at the very least he's chosen to use the best software.
    Stuart if you want some work and are not too proud to have an old git pointing you in the right direction contact me.
    •  
      CommentAuthorPaulT
    • CommentTimeMar 15th 2008
     
    agu - nothing personnal - you are aware enough to look for advise outside of the system, which is a good thing.

    Its the system I have problem with. (Not to mention that the SAP design is a dangerous pile of outdated and incorrect algorithms that is being taken as gosple by many assessors because that is all they know!)

    "I'm sure with the right guidance and two years down the line he'll make a good assessor"

    Peter - the problem is that the that newly trained assessors are practicing on homes that people have to live in and that is not acceptable in any way. For every person we help and guide there are many others who do not care

    I am so anoyed because they are both taking work away from me and "other professionals" leaving us to step in on finished buildings to clear up the mess.

    Unfortunately Architects are virtualy all struggling to understand building physics and the in the absense of a recognised profession to help them they are relying on SAP assessors to make sense of the moving target that is building regs and SAP.

    The starting point has to be college/university not on the job without a supporting structure. We expect this from our Architects and engineers so why not Energy Consultants?

    To be constructive I am planning on doing something. As soon as possible I will be setting up a training institute (not for profit) with the specific target of training planners and building control officers (and charging other professionals to pay for it as the former have no money).
    •  
      CommentAuthorali.gill
    • CommentTimeMar 15th 2008
     
    Ok, i'll play nice.
    The nher course is actually five days. (63 less than an nvq3/onc construction), the job is assessing design drawings of properties to see if they comply, the company offers staff training.
    Any criticism should be directed at the colleges for not teaching vocational skills. PaulT and the like will have to spend to become a cibse low carbon consultant in design then spend again to be lcc in bldng operations and plenty more to produce epc's.
    Certainly makes you wonder why bother investing so much in academic study when three or four short courses and some bedtime reading and you're in £30-40k p.a territory.
    So the point that needs to be pushed is if your getting sap, sbem, or simulation calcs, make sure its from an associate or member of Cibse or Ciat or both.
    • CommentAuthorMike George
    • CommentTimeMar 15th 2008 edited
     
    I used to be an Associate member of CIAT, but lapsed my membership because I could not get full membership without working for somebody else for three years. This despite twenty plus years in the Building Industry and Six in University. I now teach Thermal analysis software and am actively involved in research. I've given up trying to get into that particular club!

    I agree that the route into SAP assessment is far too easy, but I am not sure that CIAT members automatically fit the bill either - this area is a particular specialism, and I think perhaps CIBSE are best placed to take it forward.

    EPC's are a much more complicated challenge and I firmly believe they should be compiled by groups of individuals, A Surveyor and Building Services Engineer for example, as a good knowledge of both specialisms is a necessity.

    Thats my tuppence worth
    •  
      CommentAuthorali.gill
    • CommentTimeMar 15th 2008
     
    well i've been informed that cibse are producing a new website, or series of pages, specifically dealing with this so hopefully this should solve the professionalism issue and provide a structured and consistent training format. i only mentioned associate of ciat as it recognises academic achievement and professional standards - the course i'm doing is ciat accredited and we're doing ies ve simulation and sbem. if sap is mickey mouse then rdsap must be pluto - personally i think they're as much about generating economy activity as they are epbd compliance.
  5.  
    Pluto is about right.

    Where are you learning IES?
    •  
      CommentAuthorali.gill
    • CommentTimeMar 15th 2008
     
    uwic - starting on ies next year. will be doing sbem calcs on one of the teaching blocks as part of environmental design assignment once i finish business plan on epc assessor training. that reminds me - does anyone have any idea what cost these non-domestic sbem generated epcs will be at level 3 ?
    •  
      CommentAuthorPaulT
    • CommentTimeMar 16th 2008
     
    I agree with Mike - there is no professionalbody out there that is suitable - they all have other primary interests.

    I have lectured to CIAT members on SAP and air tightness and I still find they are making the same mistakes (if I see them).

    --------------
    Another problem is that NHBC and Local Authorities are offering SAP services. Under the rules of building control they are not allowed to approve any designe changes they may want to make.

    There are two problems with this - the energy assesssment is just an after thought and there is no process for design improvement.
    •  
      CommentAuthoragu
    • CommentTimeMar 17th 2008
     
    Thanks for the feedback. I too find it quite strange that I can take a 5 day course and then be an authorised assessor. I do worry that I don't yet know enough but am trying everyday to increase my knowledge and can't help but feel that regardless of any courses, no matter how long or by who only real experience will make me better. Now the problem with this is I need to be an authorised assessor to get the software, to be able to do the work etc so that's what I've done. I often sit on this forum and get lost with terms or specs but come back everyday to try and stick with it and make myself better qualified to do my job, and I'm not a chump I'm just trying to take a great opportunity that I've been given by a company and do something I enjoy. Peter A I would be gratful for any help and would have no problem with an old git being the one to give it.

    Agu
    • CommentAuthorflemish
    • CommentTimeMar 17th 2008
     
    I have to say I agree with ali.gil. I too have been studying for over 5 years and find it extremely demeaning that after a 5-day course the term ‘qualified’ or ‘certified’ can even be mentioned is absolute madness.
    This is not a criticism to agu as if I was in your position I would exploit the system in exactly the same way.
    What also disappoints me about the education system in the Uk is that on the Architectural technologist bachelors degree, the modules including SBEM and IES are carried out by students in which they are taught how to use the software, and carry out relevant tasks using the software, but are not credited for the knowledge or application of the software with a certificate such as agu has for the 5 day course he completed. I find this odd
    •  
      CommentAuthorali.gill
    • CommentTimeMar 17th 2008
     
    Agu - you are clearly no chump by investing your time on here and my comments were not at you but the system of vocational training in general. the fact an individual could be a dell trotter market trader one month and a sap assessor the next to me (and i think others) seems to stink a little. There was a recent article about a graduate achieving the 1000th kef scholarship to set up a firm producing domestic epc's, loads of publicity about it and yet she did a degree in waste management. (the fact she's fat and ugly is more my problem with media coverage of people, that really should be kept indoors.) The business model for solely producing domestic epc's is poor, their value for hip's is now around £30-40 each. SAP calcs are misleading by a long way. Site training of construction details to achieve airtightness and properly fitted insulation is non-existent. Most developments have serious snagging problems after release to new owners; kitchens cant be fitted properly so what hope for proper detailing, especially with piece rate work. Hence the need for off-site construction methods, properly managed fabrication with quality standards, materials re-use, employee training investment, community feel good factor, sustainable communities, local jobs, skills development, apprenticeships for school leavers, respect for mentors, more respect for oneself and the community, less crime. And we achieve zero carbon targets/ aspirations/ dreamtime/ whatever you call it.
    •  
      CommentAuthoragu
    • CommentTimeMar 17th 2008
     
    Ali - I agree I am no chump, and the sytem does seem silly! Now that I have passed the course I do worry that I still don't know enough as the programme does all the calculations and the technical side of things by and large but if the government and planning are asking for all these things, and this probably relates more to renewables and CSH, and there aren't enough experts out there what's the solution?
    •  
      CommentAuthorali.gill
    • CommentTimeMar 17th 2008
     
    i would suggest the first step is to look at the requirements of the cibse low carbon consultant role. digest the three reading lists and attend the assessment. discuss career development with employers and get support either for day release or evening attendance of a suitable course. the problem is i dont think there is one at hnc/hnd/bsc level yet. so if you cant get one the msc advanced energy and env studies at cat then you commit to the nearest relevance course simply to give you the academic stepping stone you need.
    the cat course is now proven and i feel the content should be incorporated with recent legislative change to produce a long term bsc level course that should be franchised out to more uni's to make the specialism more accessible.
    it is a difficult one. having committed to the academic route as a part-time student i dont get sufficient time or money to attend the sap/sbem courses, but even if i carry on as planned to msc level then without the certification from these short courses the msc qualification doesnt provide the easy income generating role that five days on a sap course does. maybe pault can develop that part further as it seems that is the position he's in.
    My Solution 1 is better integration of legislative change and generation of these new specialist roles with academic institutions rather than (or at least in conjunction with) independent training companies. Energy assessment is going to be a fast growth, uncharted horizon
    if you complete level3dip in nondom energy ass. with nher you become a commercial energy assessor - do the same with cibse and you become a non-domestic energy assessor. there will be plenty confusion over level 3,4 and 5 competence the least we can do is agree on a job title.
    There are to be 3 types of assessment - design, on completion and in-use. This is in both domestic and commercial/non-domestic. On top of this there are to be display energy certificates for public buildings over 1000m2 from October and the software for thats not finished yet.
    My Solution 2 is subscription to modern building services magazine and a good read of the archive in the menu on the left.
    My Solution 3 (and what many of us rely on) is for keith to bring some sense to this with a comprehensive article in gb mag.
Add your comments

    Username Password
  • Format comments as
 
   
The Ecobuilding Buzz
Site Map    |   Home    |   View Cart    |   Pressroom   |   Business   |   Links   
Logout    

© Green Building Press