Green Building Bible, Fourth Edition |
![]() |
These two books are the perfect starting place to help you get to grips with one of the most vitally important aspects of our society - our homes and living environment. PLEASE NOTE: A download link for Volume 1 will be sent to you by email and Volume 2 will be sent to you by post as a book. |
Vanilla 1.0.3 is a product of Lussumo. More Information: Documentation, Community Support.
Posted By: gyrogearThe idea is to use the IR to warm the partition wall, turning it into a sort of "storage radiator".That would probably work as suggested but I'm not sure it's desirable. Since what you're wanting is a bit more thermal comfort for a short time any form of storage does more harm than good as it means you have to turn the heaters on earlier and might get overheating later when the wall is still warm but the sun is coming in.
Posted By: fostertomI think the storage part of the idea is good. By its nature it will be short-life storage, to prolong until getting-up time and a little beyond, the overnight output from the woodburner and to apply it not just in the room containing the IR heaters, …But gyrogear's original post makes it clear that it doesn't work (enough) for that - the room is too cool in the morning. I'd agree, though, that any low-e paint there would reduce any storage that's helping now but wouldn't the reduced run time of the heaters in the morning be a bigger benefit?
The heaters would then be well above floor level, off our general trafficable route, and out of sight. They would be pointed at a partition wall, 4m x 4m
Posted By: gyrogeartwo low-cost infrared heaters -- dual 600/1200 watt (tubes).
Posted By: gyrogearThe partion wall is hollow-brick with plaster over.But, yes, the storage is both small and (slightly) harmful.
Posted By: CWattersLets say you were able to heat up one side of the plasterboard wall by 5CIt's not - it's
Posted By: gyrogearThe partition wall is hollow-brick with plaster over
Posted By: Ed DaviesBut gyrogear's original post makes it clear that it [the undersized woodburner which doesn't make it thro till the morning] doesn't work (enough) for that - the room is too cool in the morningEh? so that's what the IR is for - to input some heat back into what's stored (but running out) ready for geting-up time - instead of doing same by refuelling the woodburner at 5.30am.
Posted By: Ed DaviesBut gyrogear's original post makes it clear that it [the storage part of the idea] doesn't work (enough) for that - the room is too cool in the morning.I don't understand why anybody would want to store heat from an instant heater when all that's wanted is actual instant heat for a few hours. Unless electricity is significantly cheaper earlier in the morning, of course.
Posted By: fostertomI think the storage part of the idea is good.
Posted By: fostertomDo you get off-peak rate electricity at that time of day/night?
Posted By: fostertomthat's what the IR is for - to input some heat back into what's stored (but running out) ready for geting-up time - instead of doing same by refuelling the woodburner at 5.30am.
Posted By: SteamyTeaWhy not just put a storage heater in.
Posted By: djhWhy not point the IR heaters downwards at the floor instead of the wall?
1 to 16 of 16