Home  5  Books  5  GBEzine  5  News  5  HelpDesk  5  Register  5  GreenBuilding.co.uk
Not signed in (Sign In)

Categories



Green Building Bible, Fourth Edition
Green Building Bible, fourth edition (both books)
These two books are the perfect starting place to help you get to grips with one of the most vitally important aspects of our society - our homes and living environment.

PLEASE NOTE: A download link for Volume 1 will be sent to you by email and Volume 2 will be sent to you by post as a book.

Buy individually or both books together. Delivery is free!


powered by Surfing Waves




Vanilla 1.0.3 is a product of Lussumo. More Information: Documentation, Community Support.

Welcome to new Forum Visitors
Join the forum now and benefit from discussions with thousands of other green building fans and discounts on Green Building Press publications: Apply now.




  1.  
    Posted By: GarethCApologies to harp on, but would -really- appreciate your opinion on A2A. Why a non starter for you?


    In our case Gareth our DHW demand is higher than our space heating so despite the lower cost to install A2A I think A2W is a better option for us.

    In any case heat distribution becomes a problem for us with A2A, it would really need to be a unit that we could add to the MVHR duct to replace the current electric after heater and when I looked I couldn't find anything to suit.

    Next best option would be a multi split with one unit upstairs and one unit downstairs the cost here would be about £2,000 including installation.

    The unit would only need to operate in the coldest months so even with the better COP of A2A I don't think it will be better than around 3.0

    So the saving on our heat load of 2702kWhrs would be around 1,800kWhrs per year which at 8.7p per unit would be £157 a year or 12.7 years pay back time. (see my comments above on the life time of our last (Italian made) unit).

    Even with a COP of 4.0 the payback period only drops to 11.4 years.
  2.  
    OK, thanks for making that clearer St and Chris, I got it now (brain warming up slowly)

    But then isn't this what the "green building" choice is all about and why those that choose the path are more forward thinking than the general population/consumer led commercialism?

    Its not about immediate savings/ profit, its about looking to the long term. 12 years doesn't seem that long to me and after that its all good except for the occasional maintenance.

    Isn't it about future proofing your family against energy price shocks, or those bitter winters when its a choice of putting the heating on to be comfortable but stressing about the utility bill at the end of it?

    I think money put into a well built/insulated/airtight house is going to work far more for you/me in te long term, than putting the money in the bank.

    Personally, when I build my house now, its for the long term future free from: 1. a mortgage and 2. being held by the short and curlys of energy prices. in my perhaps misguided mind this might equate to some level of comfort and security.
  3.  
    I think there's a real factor about mobility, or lack of.

    Crudely, if your payback is going to be 12 years, and you move every 4 and redo the project, then you are (from your own viewpoint), throwing away 65% of your investment if there is no added value on the sale price.

    In that context, Green Deal or Rent-a-Roof type deals may look attractive.

    Or rental may become attractive, where someone else makes the investment and gets the return.

    F
    • CommentAuthorGarethC
    • CommentTimeApr 17th 2014 edited
     
    Thanks Chris, that's interesting. And bad news on the robustness, although I suppose northern European or Japanese makes might be expected to do better (Japan has a very large temperature variation between summer and winter, and in the west and north it gets much colder than in the UK). I've actually got a Japanese friend digging around for any interesting Japanese field data. They've been using these things for yonks, so there should be some.

    On the time horizon question, I agree with ferdinand I think. I reckon households will invest in green measures, but often only if the economics are reasonably good. And while some may be able to take a long term view, I do think that many, if not most, will want paybacks of not much more than five years, and ideally less. There's Ferdinand's moving point, but also people are just generally fairly short termist. Jam tomorrow just feels so much less valuable than jam today.
  4.  
    The law of diminishing returns will always get you in the end!

    If our heat demand were higher there is no question that the payback period on the A2A would be considerably better.

    Regarding robustness I should point out that the unit was quite exposed, about 75m from the water but being the Baltic the salt levels are very low. It was a PCB that failed in the outdoor unit and could have been replaced but in this crazy world it was cheaper to replace the entire unit than repair it. I don't know what the problem was with the indoor unit but it had become very noisy so probably a lot of wear on the bearings etc.

    The brother in law does have a Panasonic unit which I think is now around 8 years old and it still runs very quiet and he has had no problems with it that I am aware of, it is in a much more sheltered environment and doesn't run under a very heavy load as it supplements low temp. radiators.
  5.  
    A further point is Jam Today.

    That is, if presented with two new houses to buy for £x (say £200,000), and it is a four bed with double garage to normal spec, or a three bed with single garage to PH spec, then most will go for the storage and the extra room. If the PH premium is 5%-10% or so, that may be roughly where we are.

    Or may have no choice due to number of children or resident grandparent.

    That equation will change with energy (or other) prices going up, but I'd suggest that payback would need to be within very few years (say 5-6) to make the benefit big enough on the horizon to sell itself. Perhaps you could afford to charge £10k more if it was going to save £2k a year.

    Much as I *hate* over-regulation, increasing technical building performance standards makes a lot of sense here *provided* that unnecessary overheads have been pared back first. That is a point always missed by kneejerk paperwork enthusiasts.

    For old-build, I still think EPC-linked differential stamp duty rates have a lot to commend them.

    I don't see any prospect of regulation being trimmed further though; I think that even Eric "Bloodaxe the Gonk" Pickles may have hit his limit.

    And there's the small matter of RDSAP not flagging up running costs properly, which hardly helps.

    F
  6.  
    Posted By: ferdinand2000I think there's a real factor about mobility, or lack of.

    Crudely, if your payback is going to be 12 years, and you move every 4 and redo the project, then you are (from your own viewpoint), throwing away 65% of your investment if there is no added value on the sale price.

    In that context, Green Deal or Rent-a-Roof type deals may look attractive.

    Or rental may become attractive, where someone else makes the investment and gets the return.

    F

    Barring unforeseen circumstances we do intend to be in this house for a minimum of 12 years until the kids have moved out and we will decide then whether to stay on or move, so that does make it a little easier to make longer term decisions.

    Ironically it would be the prospect of selling that would probably demand that I install a heat pump as even though our running costs are low the market would react badly to a house being heated by direct electricity.

    I've pretty much decided to go ahead and order the 4.5kW Fujitsu A2W unit and see it as an insurance against rising electricity prices and hope that we don't run into any costly repairs.

    However all the commentary here is that electricity prices will remain at this level for the foreseeable future but you never know a change of government could change all that.

    Indeed there is a good argument from this thread that electricity prices are too low!

    I also took some photos of our roof at various times during the day yesterday to access where the shadows from the dormer fall to try to work out would be the best size and layout of PV array to install.

    We may not get to nett zero but hopefully won't be too far off.
  7.  
    >Ironically it would be the prospect of selling that would probably demand that I install a heat pump as even though our running costs are low the market would react badly to a house being heated by direct electricity.

    Yep. Also ironically I'm just putting a (planned not to be used) lecky underfloor heating mat in our conservatory for that same marketing reason, which is arguably reprehensible but there was no way short of 5x the cost to extend the other system. Neither is strictly necessary. I have also made provision for it to be a potential small overheat dump should we install solar, as it is on the North side next to a cool lounge, and we could grow exotics.

    The same goes for future new builds should I win my current planning battle (now at Appeal). PH-ish standards (prob non-certified) would be an aim, but could I sell them in future with no central heating?

    What is the environmental cost of unused fallback provision in eco-houses ? :-).

    Ferdinand
    • CommentAuthortony
    • CommentTimeApr 17th 2014
     
    I am not sure that I agree that PH costs 5 to 10% more! without certification the get close to PH in my view could cost less than a run of the mill house built supposedly to current standards.

    I do not see that there is any environmental cost to having a fall back provision, it would cost more not having it and then finding out that it was necessary. I see money as a valuable resource too.
Add your comments

    Username Password
  • Format comments as
 
   
The Ecobuilding Buzz
Site Map    |   Home    |   View Cart    |   Pressroom   |   Business   |   Links   
Logout    

© Green Building Press