Home  5  Books  5  GBEzine  5  News  5  HelpDesk  5  Register  5  GreenBuilding.co.uk
Not signed in (Sign In)

Categories



Green Building Bible, Fourth Edition
Green Building Bible, fourth edition (both books)
These two books are the perfect starting place to help you get to grips with one of the most vitally important aspects of our society - our homes and living environment.

PLEASE NOTE: A download link for Volume 1 will be sent to you by email and Volume 2 will be sent to you by post as a book.

Buy individually or both books together. Delivery is free!


powered by Surfing Waves




Vanilla 1.0.3 is a product of Lussumo. More Information: Documentation, Community Support.

Welcome to new Forum Visitors
Join the forum now and benefit from discussions with thousands of other green building fans and discounts on Green Building Press publications: Apply now.




    • CommentAuthorShevek
    • CommentTimeAug 20th 2013
     
    Hadn't heard of this:

    "Baumit EWI System open is a highly efficient insulation system with the added benefit of breathability due to its innovative use of perforated insulation boards"

    Anyone used it?
  1.  
    Mentioned it in the past , heard of it not used it , presumed it was graphite eps with vapour open finish , not sure what the board have special about them ? I've some product marketing info , but its not very detailed.
    http://www.baumit.co.uk/upload/Bilder/2790_Baumit_EWI_Brochure.pdf
  2.  
    I used it before when my head was full of the "oh it needs to breathe!" concept, I even fitted 200mm regular EPS on one job and made a spiking tool to make holes in it. I later realized it was all unnecessary.
    Concentrate on airtightness and don't spend too much time worrying about breathability, there's little science to back up the 5:1 breath-ability bau-biology concept!
  3.  
    VH , what made you change your views, anything in particular or just general lack of science on subject
  4.  
    Hi James

    A number of reports/programmes seem to pay little heed to diffusion;
    WUFI pays little regard to vapour diffusion and assumes an airtightness level of 3ACH.
    The Spokane and Tsong studies where they opened the walls of 250 houses, the walls were built wrong in terms of 5:1 breathability but no decay was found.
    http://www.viking-house.ie/downloads/Tsong79.pdf
    http://www.viking-house.ie/downloads/Spokane.pdf
    The Canadian House Building Manual disregards diffusion and says that airtightness id 100 times more important.
    This Fraunhofer document http://www.viking-house.ie/downloads/Moisture%20Buffering%20Effect%20of%20Wood%20Products.pdf shows that when you put plasterboard in front of hydroscopic insulation the effect is reduced by 80%.
    The Passive House Institute says that the wall build-up is not important if you make it airtight and pays little regard to breathable materials.
    •  
      CommentAuthorfostertom
    • CommentTimeAug 21st 2013 edited
     
    What a turn-around for all of us!

    At root, it's because the enormous quantities of water that's in any building structure, hopefully harmless in vapour form, originates at least as much from outside, not so much from inside as everyone's been thinking - in fact overwhelmingly from outside. It enters mainly by penetration, both acceptable and uncontrolled, and leaves by drying, both outward and inward - a seasonal ebb and flow, mainly by diffusion.

    If you add to that background, quantities of bulk air movement due to non-airtightness, that's a continuous supply of more water, which so far simulators like WUFI can only roughly estimate, but can overwhelm the predictable diffusion based ebb and flow.

    So it's ironic that just when Fraunhofer/WUFI turns our understanding upside down, in the same breath they say that WUFI isn't (so far) designed to accurately handle what turns out to be the main threat - air infiltration/air tightness!
    • CommentAuthorEd Davies
    • CommentTimeAug 21st 2013
     
    Maybe more pragmatic than ironic. We can't calculate the effects of infiltration because we can't measure them so the best thing seems to be to eliminate them so that we can calculate the effects of what's left (diffusion)?
    •  
      CommentAuthorfostertom
    • CommentTimeAug 21st 2013 edited
     
    It's a powerful new argument for airtightness. The prev argument, that once you've super insulated, airchange is the biggest remaining heat loss, wasn't so compelling because it was still a pretty small loss, compared with hitherto.

    Now the argument is that once you've super insulated, it'll condense and rot unless you also make it airtight.

    Plus the one about MHRV isn't effective unless airtight.
    •  
      CommentAuthorSteamyTea
    • CommentTimeAug 21st 2013
     
    Posted By: fostertomoriginates at least as much from outside, not so much from inside as everyone's been thinking
    I always thought that most vapour comes from outside, is infact how I did a risk assessment when I insulated my loft. There is a thread about it somewhere in the mists of time. Mike George may remember where it is.
    • CommentAuthorpiersadler
    • CommentTimeAug 21st 2013
     
    I have recently put wood fibre EWI (NBT Diffutherm system) on my Victorian terraced house. The old brick wall was very wet mainly from rain penetration through external cement render defects. It had been water proofed internally some years ago and the damp was beginning to pop out around the edges of the internal waterproofing. I drilled into the wall and installed some i-buttons and the RH I measured was close to 100% ie the wall was saturated.
    With the EWI it's been breathing for nearly a year now and seems to be much dryer. I'm about to do some more tests (will post). In this instance the breathability was a very important feature as we would have had to leave the brickwork exposed for quite a while to allow the wall to dry out.
    I also think that breathability provides long term security against water ingress through defects that may arise in future.
    More info on my house on http://www.piers-sadler.co.uk/news/2013/3/8/update-on-pierss-house.html

    Not convinced about the idea of EPS with holes in it. Hygroscopicity is an important feature of natural fibres as it can hold and 'manage' the water.
    •  
      CommentAuthorfostertom
    • CommentTimeAug 21st 2013
     
    Wot, holes from inside to outside? Will catastrophically degrade the insulation value, as air convect busily from warm to cold end of the 'pipe'. Essential to fill all such through-passages - fully foam fill (in depth) the joints between the EWI blocks, even if they're 'tight' - and it's not enough to just seal the inboard or outboard end of the passage.
  5.  
    Piers makes a good point. In homes where it's unrealistic to expect high levels of airtightness , doesn't a vapour open fabric give this moisture a route out ?
  6.  
    Yes but Woodfibre board isn't much more breathable than EPS or Rockwool batts! The external insulation stops rain wetting the bricks which is the greatest source of wetting and the brick wall being a higher temperature is more resistant to interstitial condensation!
  7.  
    Having just EWIed the main house I am just contemplating doing similar to the another house on the farm. This house is a stone / rubble / stone wall 50cm thick, without any sort of DPC. The plan is (was?) to put in a french drain with EPS below ground level, continued up to 50cm above ground level then continue with (v. expensive) vapour open mineral wool.

    The walls are of impermeable stone (actually basalt rocks) pointed with a variety of mixes form lime/sand through to cement/sand with most variations between. one side is rendered with sand/lime (putty)/cement at about 6:3:2. (the inside is rendered with similar)

    I have wondered about the need for the expensive vapour open mineral wool as it can not be used down to ground level or below GL (hence the plan to use EPS in the french drain and for the first 50cm) so is there much point above that. Whilst the conventional wisdom is that stone walls should have breathable insulation if the rocks are impermeable this only leaves the pointing area to release any vapour so is there any need for an open insulation.

    The content of this thread has opened the whole question again in my mind about the need for vapour open insulation on this type of wall. Air tightness is variable as the occupants are currently a family with 3 small boys and doors and windows are continually being opened and closed.

    Given this description and the above thread - does the team think that the vapour open insulation is needed or can the much cheaper and more readily available EPS be used.
    • CommentAuthorSaint
    • CommentTimeAug 23rd 2013
     
    How about all the EWI systems that have used phenolic, PIR and PUR insulation?
    The insulation boards are foil faced on both sides and so are impermeable to moisture vapour. Even XPS which is also impermeable has been used from way back.
    •  
      CommentAuthorfostertom
    • CommentTimeAug 23rd 2013
     
    Who says EPS isn't (fairly) vapour open? And the pointing will let plenty plenty of vapour through. Never mind the lack of DPC - driving rain is the overwhelming source of water entering the wall (transforms to vapour just below the surface) and EWI will stop most of that. Thereafter, plenty of drying potential both inward and outward. Impervious EWI will halve that drying ability. Simple EPS EWI as thick as you like, sounds ideal, bomb proof. If in doubt, get a WUFI check.
    • CommentAuthorEd Davies
    • CommentTimeAug 23rd 2013
     
    PiH, why would mineral wool EWI be very expensive? Though it's not the most compact form of insulation mineral wool is generally about the cheapest for a given amount of thermal resistance. Are you thinking of the extra structure needed to support it and the rainscreen?
  8.  
    The rockwool type EWI insulation here is about 2.5 times the price of EPS.You can get a complete EPS EWI package (adhesive at 5kg/M2, EPS, glass mesh, plastic nails and white finishing render) at a price / sq M that is less than the price of the rockwool type insulation alone!
    •  
      CommentAuthorSteamyTea
    • CommentTimeAug 23rd 2013
     
    Care to put some prices on it so we can compare to what we pay?
  9.  
    Posted By: SteamyTeaCare to put some prices on it so we can compare to what we pay?

    100mm insulation is the standard retrofit EWI here to the extent that if you want a house's worth of something else its ordered for you, otherwise 100mm is in stock.

    100mm EPS is generally 4.32 gbp /m2, but I did find one place down to 3.9 gbp / m2
    100mm package deals are about 9 gbp /m2, (5kg adhesive/m2 and white finish)

    Rockwool for EWI is listed as 11.2 gbp / m2 and the best sale price I found is 8.65 gbp / m2

    I've just done the family house, 100mm EPS, and the 250 m2 came out as materials 9.22 gbp / m2 (8kg adhesive / m2 and colour finish) plus 6.35 gbp / m2 labour

    But to add some context the average wage in the UK is 2.6 times that of Hungary and the minimium wage in the UK is about 4 times that of Hungary. Domestic energy prices are higher here than the UK and the FIT is about 1/4 of the UK (which explains the lack of much PV here) (comparison data from tinternet so must be correct!)
  10.  
    I've used Rockwool, Wood fiber-board and EPS external insulation on different wall types, if I was back again I would probably stick with EPS on all wall types. Ext Ins moves the Dew point out and if you put some up to your mouth you can blow through it, porus concrete blocks are no less breathable than rubble walls!
    You could seal any holes in the wall before you insulate.
    • CommentAuthorShevek
    • CommentTimeAug 27th 2013 edited
     
    Posted By: Viking HouseI've used Rockwool, Wood fiber-board and EPS external insulation on different wall types, if I was back again I would probably stick with EPS on all wall types.

    What about cork Seamus, ever used that? If we hadn't had such a tight budget we would have used cork.
    • CommentAuthorn2e4ewi
    • CommentTimeMay 30th 2014
     
    Hello all, a lot of this is over my head, I have talked to TRADER who are unable to give a direct answer, so my question "for wood covered by EWI should it be allowed to breath which I assume will allow damp and water ingress or be sealed and then would rot start due to no air movement. Your comments would and advise would be good thanks Peter
  11.  
    Wood should not be in any environment where it is likely to get wet unless it can just as readily dry out. If you think of a scaffold plank. It will take a very long time to rot while it is sat on scaffold. If you place the same plank on muddy ground how long will it take for the underside to rot?

    So sealing any wood behind external render is not a smart idea . I would expect the render on top of the wood to expand and contract deferentially to that directly on the EPS. This possibly resulting in surface cracks; water ingress; and subsequent rot.
    •  
      CommentAuthordjh
    • CommentTimeMay 31st 2014
     
    Posted By: n2e4ewifor wood covered by EWI should it be allowed to breath which I assume will allow damp and water ingress

    As long as the wood is covered by enough EWI that the temperature of the wood is above the dewpoint then it's fine. In that particular case it doesn't matter whether the EWI and render is vapour-open or not.

    If there isn't enough EWI, then the sealed case will definitely rot. Whether the vapour-open case rots or not depends on local conditions (temperatures and humidities) and what materials surround the timber (how hygroscopic, and what vapour resistive components there are and where they are placed). Run WUFI and cross your fingers.
    • CommentAuthorn2e4ewi
    • CommentTimeJun 21st 2014
     
    The risk of dry rot developing increases with increased levels of humidity which can occur following the installation of solid wall insulation. An increase in wet rot can be caused by high levels of moisture or humidity in timbers due to poor detailing.
    Insect attack to timber structures is increased if the timbers are not kept dry. In older solid wall dwellings (where timbers are more prevalent) any increase in the relative humidity can lead to an increased risk of insect attack on timbers.

    A number of household pests including dust mites, bed bugs and clothes moths are more active and prevalent in increased humidity which can follow the installation of solid wall insulation.
    • CommentAuthorn2e4ewi
    • CommentTimeJun 21st 2014
     
    Dear DJH

    What would you say is enough ?? 5mm the problem we have found is the wood is then used to fix back items like satellites and lights with in some cases 12mm bolts into the wood this give a water ingress path your comments would be good thanks Peter White ACIOB n2e4ewi@gmail.com
    • CommentAuthorn2e4ewi
    • CommentTimeJun 21st 2014
     
    The risk of dry rot developing increases with increased levels of humidity which can occur following the installation of solid wall insulation. An increase in wet rot can be caused by high levels of moisture or humidity in timbers due to poor detailing.
    Insect attack to timber structures is increased if the timbers are not kept dry. In older solid wall dwellings (where timbers are more prevalent) any increase in the relative humidity can lead to an increased risk of insect attack on timbers.

    A number of household pests including dust mites, bed bugs and clothes moths are more active and prevalent in increased humidity which can follow the installation of solid wall insulation.
    •  
      CommentAuthordjh
    • CommentTimeJun 22nd 2014
     
    Hello n2e4ewi, I'm not sure why you've posted the same message twice? And it appears to be a quote from somewhere (where?) with no comment so I've no idea what your question or input is.

    As I said, to decide how much you need run a WUFI simulation.

    Increased insulation shouldn't in itself cause an increase in humidity. The usual problem is people insulating their houses and making them more airtight and then not ensuring adequate ventilation.

    Looking again at your postings, there seems to be some lack of clarity between 'breathing' (to do with water vapour) and watertight (to do with liquid water). These are different things and need to be addressed separately in the construction.
    • CommentAuthorn2e4ewi
    • CommentTimeJun 22nd 2014
     
    Hello DJH, sorry about the copy post not sure why ?? You mention the word "enough" what do you call enough ?

    Thanks
   
The Ecobuilding Buzz
Site Map    |   Home    |   View Cart    |   Pressroom   |   Business   |   Links   
Logout    

© Green Building Press