Home  5  Books  5  GBEzine  5  News  5  HelpDesk  5  Register  5  GreenBuilding.co.uk
Not signed in (Sign In)

Categories



Green Building Bible, Fourth Edition
Green Building Bible, fourth edition (both books)
These two books are the perfect starting place to help you get to grips with one of the most vitally important aspects of our society - our homes and living environment.

PLEASE NOTE: A download link for Volume 1 will be sent to you by email and Volume 2 will be sent to you by post as a book.

Buy individually or both books together. Delivery is free!


powered by Surfing Waves




Vanilla 1.0.3 is a product of Lussumo. More Information: Documentation, Community Support.

Welcome to new Forum Visitors
Join the forum now and benefit from discussions with thousands of other green building fans and discounts on Green Building Press publications: Apply now.




    • CommentAuthorShevek
    • CommentTimeMay 21st 2013
     
    Can you recommend a 32 mm stopcock? It's for a 32 mm MDPE mains water pipe.

    I'm not sure what we're doing after the stopcock. 22 mm copper? A manifold? What's the best way to t-off from the stopcock? I need to put a meter in somewhere too... before the stopcock I assume?
    • CommentAuthorowlman
    • CommentTimeMay 21st 2013
     
    If underground it may be cheaper to first reduce the 32mm MDPE to 25mm and then insert the necessary stop cock and tee off all in 25mm. Then convert the 25mm MDPE to 22mm copper further down the line above ground with straight couplers. 32 mm underground fittings can be expensive e.g. 32mm stopcock £86.98: 25mm stopcock £50.01 all plus VAT.
    • CommentAuthorCav8andrew
    • CommentTimeMay 22nd 2013
     
    Currently on Ebay, Plasson 32mm stop cock (new) £17.99 + postage, I am currently looking myself. If all your incoming mains is 32mm would it not be preferable to avoid a reduction to 25mm.
    • CommentAuthorShevek
    • CommentTimeMay 22nd 2013
     
    Posted By: owlmanIf underground it may be cheaper to first reduce the 32mm MDPE to 25mm and then insert the necessary stop cock and tee off all in 25mm.

    Why does it matter if it's underground or not owlman?
    • CommentAuthorbarney
    • CommentTimeMay 22nd 2013
     
    Not so much the location as the material - joints for isolation valves, meters etc are a lot more expensive for MDPE than they are for copper.

    Personally, I would bring the MDPE through totally unbroken to an internal location and then change to copper at that point and then fit the IV and meter (in that order unless you want the meter at the boundary for leak detection purposes of course)

    regards

    barney
    • CommentAuthorCWatters
    • CommentTimeMay 22nd 2013
     
    Won't the water co want a say in where the meter goes?
    • CommentAuthorbarney
    • CommentTimeMay 22nd 2013
     
    If it's a revenue or fiscal meter, yes - although I thought Shevek was after a meter so he could manage consumption - ie a private check meter - or at least I concluded that from another thread

    Regards

    barney
    • CommentAuthorEd Davies
    • CommentTimeMay 22nd 2013 edited
     
    This is the problem with having lots of different threads on closely related subjects: I'm fairly sure Shevek said something about his lot wanting their own meter for monitoring purposes separate from the water company's one but maybe it was somebody else and I, for one, can't be bothered to search.
    •  
      CommentAuthorjoe90
    • CommentTimeMay 22nd 2013
     
    I second wot Ed said :bigsmile:
  1.  
    It's a balance; from experience I know when I hit a subject with an all encompassing thread I often lose half of what I'm after, potential commentators switch off and I start being very military again with numbered lists and unfriendly looking re-direction. I think it is important to realise that this is a Forum for discussions not just Q&A and it's success is that is a source of info for watchers as well as participators. Accordingly, having most of the important info in one thread (a well named thread) is the first priority. I think, Shevek, that it would be more useful for all if your threads were more generic and that in future I will be quicker to start another, more specific, thread, if the generic one has drifted or lost interest. Just my tupeneth worth in a small thread where most won't see it:wink:
    •  
      CommentAuthorSteamyTea
    • CommentTimeMay 22nd 2013
     
    Won't Tony loose his position as top new thread starter :wink:

    It is possible to have one thread that cover just about everything, there are a few on here, the M one and the W ones spring to mind
    • CommentAuthorShevek
    • CommentTimeMay 22nd 2013 edited
     
    Posted By: barneyPersonally, I would bring the MDPE through totally unbroken to an internal location and then change to copper at that point and then fit the IV and meter (in that order unless you want the meter at the boundary for leak detection purposes of course)

    Sounds like a plan.

    I quite like focussed threads because the forum then becomes an easily searchable database. While long threads of broad subject matter are also good they can be very difficult to refer back to and search through. I'll try and tone it down though.

    The meter is for our own monitoring purposes.
    • CommentAuthorPeterW
    • CommentTimeMay 30th 2013
     
    22mm Water meters are usually more expensive than 15mm, but you will get the associated flow reduction going to 15mm instead of 22mm.

    Are your water company fitting a 32mm rising main to the property...? They do get a little sneaky - especially one of the utility contractors - and fir 32-25 reducers, then a 25mm water meter, then back up to 32 to the house.. Check what you are paying for..!

    Also, if you go to 22mm copper, just use a quarter turn full bore lever valve as an isolator - quick and simple and very rarely do they go stiff.

    Cheers

    Peter
    • CommentAuthorShevek
    • CommentTimeJun 25th 2013 edited
     
    I've assumed we'll reduce from 32 mm to 22 mm but Barney mentions 28 mm pipe here:
    http://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/forum114/comments.php?DiscussionID=10826&page=1#Item_7

    Given that we're planning to run two showers off a combi I guess we should probably reduce to 28 mm instead of 22 mm, run that to the 1st floor bathroom and then reduce to 22 mm for the en suite on 2nd floor?

    It does look, however, like 28 mm water meters are harder to come by: http://www.jetrange.co.uk/technical-data/&id=107 http://www.elstermetering.co.uk/downloads/V100_Specification_Sheet_200411.pdf (mind you there's no 22 mm option either).
    • CommentAuthorShevek
    • CommentTimeJun 26th 2013 edited
     
    Posted By: barneyPersonally, I would bring the MDPE through totally unbroken to an internal location and then change to copper at that point and then fit the IV and meter (in that order unless you want the meter at the boundary for leak detection purposes of course)

    I went with a 32 mm Plasson Stop Cock in the end (off Ebay for £12.60) so we can get the mains water connection inspection out of the way.

    I think we'll then change to copper (not sure what size yet, probably determined by what kind of meter and softener we can get), then a drain off valve, then the meter.
    • CommentAuthorTimSmall
    • CommentTimeJun 27th 2013 edited
     
    Sorry, after the original post, I've moved this to the "Plumbing: how to calculate appropriate sized pipes for dead legs" thread, where its more directly relevant...
    • CommentAuthorborpin
    • CommentTimeJun 27th 2013
     
    Posted By: ShevekI went with a 32 mm Plasson Stop Cock in the end (off Ebay for £12.60) so we can get the mains water connection inspection out of the way.
    Remember the Water man will want to see a non-return valve in place so you need the conversion to copper. I went from 32mm to 22 but wish I had gone to 28mm before splitting to H&C of 22mm. Can still change it of course.:bigsmile:
    • CommentAuthorTimSmall
    • CommentTimeJun 30th 2013
     
    Are non-return valves still needed at the point of entry to the property? I know that there are now a load of reg for non-return valves near things like showers over baths (or more-so if near toilets), but I was under the impression that the requirement had been dropped for NR valves next to the stop tap (except in the case of a shared main - like in flats for example).
    • CommentAuthorShevek
    • CommentTimeJul 1st 2013
     
    There's nothing on the guidance they sent us that stipulates a non-return valve.
  2.  
    I had my new water supply pipe inspected on friday prior to connection in the next two weeks. No NRV fitted. Just stock tap with drain off on a T above that. Fully insulated and ducted below garage floor...
    • CommentAuthorShevek
    • CommentTimeJul 1st 2013
     
    Posted By: borpinI went from 32mm to 22 but wish I had gone to 28mm before splitting to H&C of 22mm.

    Why is that? Not as much flow rate as you'd hoped?
    • CommentAuthorborpin
    • CommentTimeJul 2nd 2013
     
    Posted By: Shevek
    Posted By: borpinI went from 32mm to 22 but wish I had gone to 28mm before splitting to H&C of 22mm.

    Why is that? Not as much flow rate as you'd hoped?
    Yes.

    It may be the NRV is a Scottish thing.
    • CommentAuthorShevek
    • CommentTimeJul 8th 2013 edited
     
    What's the point of using 28 mm copper pipe if a gas boiler only takes 15 mm?

    Or perhaps I'm not reading this correctly? How do you find out what size pipes a gas boiler takes?
    http://www.vaillant.co.uk/stepone2/data/downloads/f4/42/00/ecoTEC_plus_937_sales_brochure.pdf
    • CommentAuthorjamesingram
    • CommentTimeJul 8th 2013 edited
     
    Ask your 'Gas safe' installer :)
    The boiler requires a minimum gas pressure at the gas valve inlet to satisfy the boiler when its on full power
    , say 28kW , so as to create a safe burn , as with all pipework , you get a reduction in pressure relative to friction, resistance . So length of runs , number of bends etc. from gas supply point to boiler need to be calculated and pipes sized accordingly.
    It does seem a little strange to go all the way to the boiler in 28mm (or 22mm) only to reduce it on the boiler input to 15mm. but this is common .I presume this last restriction is not considered to have that much effect as long as the main run is sized correctly
    • CommentAuthorShevek
    • CommentTimeJul 8th 2013 edited
     
    James, it's the water pipes I'm referring to (rather than the gas). I presume that you're addressing this in your second paragraph.

    It would seem even stranger to then carry on with 28 mm water pipe after the boiler if the inlet is only 15 mm.
    •  
      CommentAuthordjh
    • CommentTimeJul 8th 2013
     
    Posted By: ShevekWhat's the point of using 28 mm copper pipe if a gas boiler on takes 15 mm?

    Isn't the discussion about the cold main? It supplies other things as well as the boiler.
    • CommentAuthorjamesingram
    • CommentTimeJul 8th 2013 edited
     
    Posted By: ShevekJames, it's the water pipes I'm referring to (rather than the gas). I presume that in your second paragraph.It would seem even stranger to then carry on with 28 mm water pipe after the boiler if the inlet is only 15 mm.
    :shamed: sorry , saw boiler , thought gas !

    re. water supply , not sure why you'd need 28mm but makes sense not to starve/reduce potential flow to the combi DHW cold feed as djh says , to other take offs . so using a larger bore up to boiler would priorities the DHW cold feed. On domestic jobs I general do it in 22mm up to combi boiler.
    • CommentAuthorShevek
    • CommentTimeJul 8th 2013 edited
     
    I haven't done calcs yet but Barney mentions the possibility of running 28 mm from the HWS generator to first floor and then on in 22 mm to the second floor (we're running two showers off the boiler):
    http://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/forum114/comments.php?DiscussionID=10826&page=1#Item_7

    So I assume he's talking about running both hot and cold in (potentially) 28 mm here. So, question is, why would you do that if boiler inlet/outlet is smaller.
    • CommentAuthorjamesingram
    • CommentTimeJul 8th 2013 edited
     
    Was he aware you were using a main pressure DHW combi , I presume he was referring to pipe sizing for a gravity fed/main presuure HW tank of similar.
    I can see why you give the combi DHW supply priority using a larger bore as mentioned above.
    Yes, the DHW outlet for a domestic combi boiler will only be 15mm , generally most just T off as you said. I suppose you still could go straight into a 22mm manifold then off to appliance in 10-15mm if you felt there was some benefit with that setup.
    • CommentAuthorTimSmall
    • CommentTimeJul 8th 2013
     
    Most combis have 15mm pipework for DHW, because at the flow rates they support (they have a flow rate limited built-in usually something like 8 to 13 litres per minute - depending on size), the pipe losses for 15mm copper are usually negligible (and as has already been said, smaller pipes between the hot water source and the points of demand gives less wasted hot water).

    It is worth running large pipes to supply the combi with cold water, since that doesn't contribute to wasted hot water, and also other things such as the kitchen cold tap, toilets etc. will take water from that pipe, so if you have a large cold supply pipe, then the dynamic pressure drop at the combi input will be minimised when you're drawing off cold water to other things (e.g. if someone flushes the toilet, you don't want the DHW flow rate to suddenly drop).

    So I have a 24kW combi, with a 22mm supply pipe from the road (length 10 metres or so), until up close to the boiler. Pipes from the combi to points of use are mainly in 10mm PEX or 10mm copper.

    But for all of this, you need to know your static and dynamic mains pressures, demand sizes, and do some pressure loss calcs, otherwise you're shooting in the dark (and may make your life difficult + waste money by over-sizing stuff).

    If you can do analogue DC circuit design, then it's exactly the same principles:

    pressure ~ voltage
    flow rate ~ current
    pipe friction ~ resistance
    flow limiter ~ current limiter
    pressure regulator ~ voltage regulator
    accumulator ~ capacitor
    static pressure ~ voltage at zero current
    dynamic pressure ~ voltage at non-zero current (i.e. under the effects of "upstream" supply resistance).

    The main difference is that the resistance of pipes goes up with flow rate (so somewhat more similar to an incandescent light bulb than a wire).
   
The Ecobuilding Buzz
Site Map    |   Home    |   View Cart    |   Pressroom   |   Business   |   Links   
Logout    

© Green Building Press