Home  5  Books  5  GBEzine  5  News  5  HelpDesk  5  Register  5  GreenBuilding.co.uk
Not signed in (Sign In)

Categories



Green Building Bible, Fourth Edition
Green Building Bible, fourth edition (both books)
These two books are the perfect starting place to help you get to grips with one of the most vitally important aspects of our society - our homes and living environment.

PLEASE NOTE: A download link for Volume 1 will be sent to you by email and Volume 2 will be sent to you by post as a book.

Buy individually or both books together. Delivery is free!


powered by Surfing Waves




Vanilla 1.0.3 is a product of Lussumo. More Information: Documentation, Community Support.

Welcome to new Forum Visitors
Join the forum now and benefit from discussions with thousands of other green building fans and discounts on Green Building Press publications: Apply now.




  1.  
    I need to update a publication and would be grateful for any sources of information regarding this. Part L [2006] gives a figure of 0.194Kg/kWh. Is this accurate or is there an updated value out there somewhere?
  2.  
    Mike, a figure of 0.19 kg/kWh is being used in the zerocarbonbritain carbon counting spreadsheet I'm recording my weekly energy use in, so sounds like it might still be fairly accurate.
    • CommentAuthorjon
    • CommentTimeApr 5th 2008
     
    I'll email you through some data when the server's up Mike
    •  
      CommentAuthorfostertom
    • CommentTimeApr 6th 2008
     
    The amount of CO2 should be exactly proportional, in any fuel, to the amount of energy released.
  3.  
    Agreed, but what is the current conversion factor? I wondered [being cynical] how accurate the Part L value was/is
    • CommentAuthorjon
    • CommentTimeApr 6th 2008
     
    • CommentAuthorCWatters
    • CommentTimeApr 6th 2008
     
    http://www.nottenergy.com/energy-costs-comparison2

    Mains Gas 0.194
    LPG 0.234
    Butane 0.210
    Propane 0.190

    and to compare

    GSHP 0.121
    Seasoned wood 0.025
    Electricity 0.422
    • CommentAuthorCWatters
    • CommentTimeApr 6th 2008 edited
     
    Posted By: fostertomThe amount of CO2 should be exactly proportional, in any fuel, to the amount of energy released.


    Until you take efficiency of the delivery system/boiler into account.
    • CommentAuthorjon
    • CommentTimeApr 6th 2008 edited
     
    "Seasoned wood 0.025"

    There appears to be no reference to where this "data" came from on the Notts website:

    Edit add:

    1 tonne fuelwood: Approx toe = 0.3125 Thus one fuelwood: 3750 kWh using UN data (UNECE). Others estimate much lower figures in the region of 2800 to 3500. Coal is 7000 or so.

    Basic transport costs (before burning: Typical UK equivalents: 476 kg / tonne or less using Bath CE data
    Thus, before burning CO2 costs are = 0.125 unless you burn the wood next to where it fell

    The carbon in - out ratios cannot be significantly different for coal as they are essentially the same thing (though the calorific product may be slightly better for coal given the higher carbon densities). The carbon content of dried timber is about 40-50%: Thus the post burning costs of timber are about unity kg fuel in for kg CO2 out

    Total outputs for timber are likely to be similar to, or worse than, any other combustion fuel: In the range of 0.25 to 0.4 Kg [CO2) /kWh.

    IMO, It is a great shame that a public body would publish such misleading and unqualified data.
    •  
      CommentAuthorfostertom
    • CommentTimeApr 6th 2008 edited
     
    Posted By: CWatters
    Posted By: fostertomThe amount of CO2 should be exactly proportional, in any fuel, to the amount of energy released.


    Until you take efficiency of the delivery system/boiler into account.
    No, it's correct - proportional to the amount of energy released at the point of burning. Mike's Q was 'how much CO2 per kWh' -I should have said 'proportional to the amount of energy delivered'
    • CommentAuthorjon
    • CommentTimeApr 6th 2008
     
    Do you mean 'in any fuel' or 'for any fuel' Tom?

    There will be a difference between fuels depending on the molecular bonding
    • CommentAuthorsimeon
    • CommentTimeApr 6th 2008
     
    Hmmmm, a difficult one. I looked on the naei website ( www.naei.org.uk ) but was unable to find CO2 emissions. However, if you want calorific values then try:

    http://www.berr.gov.uk/energy/statistics/source/cv/page18794.html

    A range of values for liquid fuels; solid fossil fuels and natural gas ( mostly methane) can be found here: (pdf)

    http://air-climate.eionet.europa.eu/docs/ETCACC_TechnPaper_2003_10_CO2_EF_fuels.pdf

    You may have to convert from tCO2/TJ but I am sure you can do that.
    :bigsmile:
    •  
      CommentAuthorfostertom
    • CommentTimeApr 6th 2008 edited
     
    jon, isn't energy released directly proportional to the amount of carbon oxidised? Simple carbon to CO2 is exothermic. Or do we have to subtract from that the various energies endothermicaly (?) required to first break the carbon free from a variety of different-chain CH bonds? And add hydrogen to H2O - also exothermic?
    • CommentAuthorSaint
    • CommentTimeApr 6th 2008
     
    Mike this table shows what Defra has used in its Carbon Emissions Reduction Target April 2008 to March 2011. This is the CERT document detailing the carbon savings obligation imposed on the utility companies

    Table 3: Carbon content and retail prices (including VAT) for each fuel type
    Fuel type kgC/kWh p/kWh
    Gas 0.0518 2.9
    Electricity (standard) 0.1175 10.0
    Electricity on-peak 0.1175 12.0
    Electricity off-peak 0.1175 4.4
    Oil 0.068 3.4
    Coal 0.082 2.3
    Logs 0.0068 2.2
    Wood chips 0.0068 1.6

    Obviously multiply by 3.66 to get CO2
    • CommentAuthorjon
    • CommentTimeApr 6th 2008
     
    I'm not sure endothermic is the right word but that's the idea Tom. Hydrogen content affects heat given out without producing Carbon. Nitrogen can be in some types of fuel together with all sorts of other elements.

    jon
    • CommentAuthorjon
    • CommentTimeApr 6th 2008
     
    That's an interesting table Saint

    Do you think it is reasonable to use a schedule of treasury coefficients for electricity tariff supply to estimate CO2 production?

    They will be discounting timber against other treasury offset requirements for re-planting and so on? If it were not the case, one could burn timber for fuel (perhaps imported just to make things worse) and emit far more CO2 than if Oil had been used whilst simultaneously getting credits for being 'environmentally friendly'.
    •  
      CommentAuthorfostertom
    • CommentTimeApr 6th 2008
     
    Right, and as coal is almost pure carbon, not hydrocarbon, so containing no hydrogen, every bit of coal energy must result in CO2 production, whereas all other fossil and bio fuels create part of their energy output out of CO2-free oxidation of hydrogen to water. That must be why coal is so 'dirty''. Do the various hydrocarbon fuels also differ significantly in their hydrogen to carbon ratio? Are we saying that oxidation of nitrogen (where present) is also part of the energy output?
    • CommentAuthorjon
    • CommentTimeApr 6th 2008
     
    Coal has a lot of sulfur in it. I don't know much about Nitrous oxide but suspect that it would be an exothermic product (as well as being a greenhouse gas) in situations where it's produced?
    • CommentAuthorsimeon
    • CommentTimeApr 6th 2008
     
    Another emissions table here:

    http://www.smfrancis.demon.co.uk/airwolvs/22emit.html

    You could use it with the calorific values I gave earlier via a link to calculate CO2 / KWh
    • CommentAuthortony
    • CommentTimeApr 6th 2008
     
    How much Carbon Dioxide per kWh of Gas? For me this is not the right question. The answer is dependant on the efficiency of use.


    How about "How much Carbon Dioxide per cubic meter of Gas? I even think selling gas in kWh is a bit misleading which a lot of gas suppliers do..
    •  
      CommentAuthorfostertom
    • CommentTimeApr 6th 2008 edited
     
    Posted By: jon'm not sure endothermic is the right word
    Why /why not? AFAIK oxidising carbon to CO2 is very exothermic; hydrogen to H20 'fairly' exothermic; presumably before either of the above can happen, the CH hydrocarbon has to be split into C and H - is that endothermic or exothermic? Or is that a wrong way of looking at it. I'd like to understand - sounds important. I so regret throwing away my A level chemistry and physics text books and exercise books - those I could understand!
    • CommentAuthorsimeon
    • CommentTimeApr 6th 2008
     
    Good point, Tony. Heating systems vary enormously in efficiency. Radiant gas fire about 85% - 90%. Central heating boilers about the same and then we have open fires which are only 15% efficient on average and ironically can easily have a whole house negative efficiency on cold days. Then using electricity if sourced from a fossil fuel power station has a low efficiency if you start from the chemically stored energy at source.

    Also, there are additional emissions in making and maintaining your systems. Perhaps we should consider those as well.
    • CommentAuthorjon
    • CommentTimeApr 6th 2008
     
    Hi Tom

    Have to admit not to knowing the exact sequence of combustion for fuels or a particular fuel. This would need a chemist familiar with the combustion cycle of the fuel. I'm not sure it's important though other then as a note that fuels are not all carbon equal

    jon
    •  
      CommentAuthorfostertom
    • CommentTimeApr 6th 2008
     
    So I now see!
  4.  
    As far as i rember from my chemistry dgree your absolutely right fostertom. the brreaking of bonds (C-H,C-C,C-N) requires energy, forming new bond (C-O,H-O etc.) releases energy it is the diference between the energy needed to break the the bond and given out forming bonds , that determines whether a reaction is endothermic (uses energy) or exothermic gives out energy. This is why alot of reactions neen energy to start them (ignition) to break the bonds intialy.
    Entropy change also comes into it (solid turning to gas results in an increase in entropy) but i shant go into that unless anyones really interested. I'm not sure i am.
  5.  
    I am doing a little research on the environmental effects of coal bed methane when used for power generation (or just burnt), if anyone has any other links to data it would be appreciated?
  6.  
    Thanks all, I need to sift through all of this.
  7.  
    Posted By: tonyHow much Carbon Dioxide per kWh of Gas? For me this is not the right question. The answer is dependant on the efficiency of use.


    How about "How much Carbon Dioxide per cubic meter of Gas? I even think selling gas in kWh is a bit misleading which a lot of gas suppliers do..


    So if I am looking to calculate CO2 emitted as a result of heating demand values [which I have in kWh]. I must first assess a percentage efficiency of the boiler and add a value [kWh] for the heat energy which is lost?

    Then calculate CO2 using the conversion factor of 0.194kg/kWh
    • CommentAuthorKimiK
    • CommentTimeSep 4th 2008 edited
     
    At the moment I'm facing a similar, related task:

    What is the latest and most accurate figure for kg CO2 per m3 of natural gas when the boiler burn is quoted as being 90% efficient?

    All suggestions welcome.
    •  
      CommentAuthorted
    • CommentTimeSep 4th 2008
     
    The SAP 2005 (Apr 2008 updated) figure is 0.194 kg CO2 per kWh and Annex A of the Digest of UK Energy Statistics 2005 states natural gas is 11 kWh/m3 so that's 2.134 kg CO2 per m3.
   
The Ecobuilding Buzz
Site Map    |   Home    |   View Cart    |   Pressroom   |   Business   |   Links   
Logout    

© Green Building Press