Home  5  Books  5  GBEzine  5  News  5  HelpDesk  5  Register  5  GreenBuilding.co.uk
Not signed in (Sign In)

Categories



Green Building Bible, Fourth Edition
Green Building Bible, fourth edition (both books)
These two books are the perfect starting place to help you get to grips with one of the most vitally important aspects of our society - our homes and living environment.

PLEASE NOTE: A download link for Volume 1 will be sent to you by email and Volume 2 will be sent to you by post as a book.

Buy individually or both books together. Delivery is free!


powered by Surfing Waves




Vanilla 1.0.3 is a product of Lussumo. More Information: Documentation, Community Support.

Welcome to new Forum Visitors
Join the forum now and benefit from discussions with thousands of other green building fans and discounts on Green Building Press publications: Apply now.




    • CommentAuthorringi
    • CommentTimeNov 25th 2014
     
    But tony, how do you get the plaster not to crack at the window frames?
    • CommentAuthortony
    • CommentTimeNov 26th 2014 edited
     
    easy, take a look at my details. I fitted the frames in the cavity with wood screwed to the outside, sealed it to the frame on fixing, sealed the internal corner, sealed and fixed a plasterboard reveal closer over several layers of sheet insulation friction fitted and sealed, sealed the always good edge of the plasterboard to the window very neatly before skimming, sand and cement plaster everywhere else, under window boards everything was air sealed first and after fitting boards.

    I only have two minor cracks on internal walls upstairs (deflection of floor) and two hairline vertical unexplained cracks up my basement walls (could be thermal or shrinkage)
    •  
      CommentAuthordjh
    • CommentTimeNov 26th 2014
     
    I found http://www.tonyshouse.cowlings.org.uk/tony205.jpg but it doesn't have any details of the sealing. What type of sealant did you use and what shape (i.e. pressed tight together, or a nominal gap, with or without a backing rod etc). How much movement is it designed to accomodate? And is it the material plus sealant that is the airtight layer or the plaster/plasterboard or the skim? I realize it might be belt and braces, regardless of what the theorists say!

    FWIW, I did two things today with sticky tape. First I tried to pull some Profil off a door threshold, so we could make some adjustments. It won't come off! Then we pulled a 3-core 25 mm² SWA cable through 30 m of duct by taping the cable to the pull-throughs with Sicrall. We've frequently used Sicrall to attach things we want to pull through with considerable force and it's never failed so far. Obviously, it's possible the answers will be different in a few years, but that's what warranties are for.
    •  
      CommentAuthorfostertom
    • CommentTimeNov 26th 2014
     
    Posted By: djhObviously, it's possible the answers will be different in a few years, but that's what warranties are for
    How long would you like your building to stay airtight? 200yrs? I would, but others will say that's ridiculous. 50yrs? Surely a minimum. 20yrs? because the future world will be so technologically fast moving and wealthy that buildings are bought and discarded like mobile phones? 10yrs - how long is the Sicral guarantee valid for? For sure, they've not tested their tape in real conditions for anything like 10yrs, so they don't know it's unconditionally guaranteeable. What conditions do they place? Who will be able to prove the in-use circumstances leading to failure after 10yrs? Will you be around to bother? I give it 2yrs before deterioration begins.

    Bit like the nuclear argument - the fact that the nuclear industry is remarkably 'safe', in terms of casualties, in the present term, is taken as proof that the completely unrelated issue of faultless long-term storage of waste, is OK.

    Present stickiness says nothing at all about long term durability.
    •  
      CommentAuthorSteamyTea
    • CommentTimeNov 26th 2014
     
    I think the science behind testing adhesives for longevity is pretty well understood. Not as if it is a couple of blokes in their sheds stumbling upon something sticky and saying 'I can't get it off this blanket, let's using for a tape'.
    •  
      CommentAuthorfostertom
    • CommentTimeNov 26th 2014
     
    Posted By: SteamyTeathe science behind testing adhesives for longevity
    What's the principle, seeing they can't actually test it over time? I'm prepared to be convinced, so let's hear the cautions too.
    • CommentAuthortony
    • CommentTimeNov 26th 2014
     
    Some things go brittle with age some adhesives tend to turn to dust, a lot loose their adhesion, all will loose anything volatile,
    • CommentAuthorcullym
    • CommentTimeNov 26th 2014
     
    •  
      CommentAuthordjh
    • CommentTimeNov 27th 2014
     
    Posted By: fostertomHow long would you like your building to stay airtight? 200yrs? I would, but others will say that's ridiculous. 50yrs? Surely a minimum. 20yrs? because the future world will be so technologically fast moving and wealthy that buildings are bought and discarded like mobile phones? 10yrs - how long is the Sicral guarantee valid for? For sure, they've not tested their tape in real conditions for anything like 10yrs, so they don't know it's unconditionally guaranteeable. What conditions do they place? Who will be able to prove the in-use circumstances leading to failure after 10yrs? Will you be around to bother? I give it 2yrs before deterioration begins.

    So, back to the irrational, unsupported diatribe when all else fails, Tom? I'm disappointed because much of what you say makes sense to me.

    I don't know anything about the warranty on Sicrall, because we've mainly used it for temporary purposes. The Proclima warranty is for 6 years and they accept product liability for 10 years (both longer than UK consumer law). I think that's pretty good. There's no warranty on your suggested solution at all, is there? The Proclima warranty started in 2000, so I fail to see how they can't have been testing for ten years, but you appear to know better, so what exactly is your proof that they haven't been testing over the period they have offered the warranty?

    Basically, they're happy to guarantee my unique roof construction against problems caused if their products fail to function to protect it, and they'll replace the entire roof if necessary.

    What research has been done and experience gained on the system you propose over 200 years or 50 years or 20 years or even ten years?

    Posted By: fostertom
    Posted By: SteamyTeathe science behind testing adhesives for longevity
    What's the principle, seeing they can't actually test it over time? I'm prepared to be convinced, so let's hear the cautions too.

    But, but ... the system you're proposing depends on adhesives in just the same way; certainly a different adhesive, but still an adhesive. So how can you possibly be confident about your system if you don't [yet] believe in the testing?
Add your comments

    Username Password
  • Format comments as
 
   
The Ecobuilding Buzz
Site Map    |   Home    |   View Cart    |   Pressroom   |   Business   |   Links   
Logout    

© Green Building Press