Home  5  Books  5  GBEzine  5  News  5  HelpDesk  5  Register  5  GreenBuilding.co.uk
Not signed in (Sign In)

Categories



Green Building Bible, Fourth Edition
Green Building Bible, fourth edition (both books)
These two books are the perfect starting place to help you get to grips with one of the most vitally important aspects of our society - our homes and living environment.

PLEASE NOTE: A download link for Volume 1 will be sent to you by email and Volume 2 will be sent to you by post as a book.

Buy individually or both books together. Delivery is free!


powered by Surfing Waves




Vanilla 1.0.3 is a product of Lussumo. More Information: Documentation, Community Support.

Welcome to new Forum Visitors
Join the forum now and benefit from discussions with thousands of other green building fans and discounts on Green Building Press publications: Apply now.




    • CommentAuthorowlman
    • CommentTimeFeb 15th 2015
     
    Does anyone know if, under the auspices of F.O.I. you can get access to the background and reasons of why a planning inspector arrived at a particular decision.
  1.  
    I can't help with that I'm afraid, but the Planning Inspectorate Officer gave me very clear reasons why he didn't agree with my appeal.
    •  
      CommentAuthornigel
    • CommentTimeFeb 15th 2015
     
    do you mean more than is provided in the decision notice, the ones I have read have given clear reasoning and background information.
    • CommentAuthorowlman
    • CommentTimeFeb 15th 2015
     
    It's all a bit sensitive at the moment Peter and Nigel, and I'm reluctant to give specifics on an open forum.
    In a nutshell I've looked at at the planning legislation plus amendments, in this very narrow area and I feel that the planning inspectorate have given the wrong advice to the County council, who have, ( not unsurprisingly), in turn used that advice as justification for a particular course of action.
    So nothing to do with appeals etc..
    • CommentAuthorTriassic
    • CommentTimeFeb 17th 2015
     
    Have you point out the error to those involved and if so, what was there response?
    • CommentAuthorowlman
    • CommentTimeFeb 17th 2015
     
    I'm onto that at the moment Steve, trying to get access to the docs to see exactly what was written and how it's been interpreted. There may be ambiguity/leeway in what the inspector wrote in which case I need to push the council into explaining why they erred one way instead of another.
    • CommentAuthorCWatters
    • CommentTimeFeb 17th 2015
     
    Posted By: owlmanIt's all a bit sensitive at the moment Peter and Nigel, and I'm reluctant to give specifics on an open forum.
    In a nutshell I've looked at at the planning legislation plus amendments, in this very narrow area and I feel that the planning inspectorate have given the wrong advice to the County council, who have, ( not unsurprisingly), in turn used that advice as justification for a particular course of action.
    So nothing to do with appeals etc..


    I think in that case you would have to appeal the council decision, wait for the planning inspectorate to reject the appeal and then challenge the decision at the high court (within 6 weeks). The high court has the power to change or set aside the planning inspectors decision.

    http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/earth/environment/9918022/Conservationists-win-landmark-High-Court-victory-against-wind-farm.html

    Quote:

    A judge ruled that a planning inspector made a “flawed” decision to give the go-ahead to plans for four 415ft turbines on farmland just a mile from Lyveden New Bield, a Grade I listed National Trust property.....

    ...Mrs Justice Lang ruled at the High Court in London today that the decision to give the go-ahead for the wind farm was legally flawed and must be quashed, meaning that the proposal will have to be reconsidered.

    She found that the planning inspector failed "properly to interpret and apply” the relevant policies on the effect of development on the setting of heritage sites.
    •  
      CommentAuthorted
    • CommentTimeFeb 17th 2015
     
    • CommentAuthorowlman
    • CommentTimeFeb 18th 2015
     
    Thanks for the links guys. The situation is not dissimilar from the example you cite, but not turbines.
Add your comments

    Username Password
  • Format comments as
 
   
The Ecobuilding Buzz
Site Map    |   Home    |   View Cart    |   Pressroom   |   Business   |   Links   
Logout    

© Green Building Press