Green Building Bible, Fourth Edition |
![]() |
These two books are the perfect starting place to help you get to grips with one of the most vitally important aspects of our society - our homes and living environment. PLEASE NOTE: A download link for Volume 1 will be sent to you by email and Volume 2 will be sent to you by post as a book. |
Vanilla 1.0.3 is a product of Lussumo. More Information: Documentation, Community Support.
Posted By: pmusgroveI don't follow the argument. Why should things get harder with people out of work? NorDan still advertise and have a stand at the eco homes exhibition so if there were too many orders for them to cope with now I would have thought they would expand ready for the upturn; not turn work away! Thanks - I will try the other suggestions.
Posted By: graecoleQuick question if I may: Internorm asked if I wanted trickle vents. I have read here that they should be avoided BUT then you need some other form of ventilation. My question is that, because I have started building, is it too late to move towards passive house standard and use mechanical heat exchange ventilation (I forget the proper term). My house is normal Scottish construction consisting of concrete slab over 100mm Kingspan (will have floating floor on top of the concrete). Walls are 145mm timber frame (Kingspan plus rockwool insulation) then 50mm cavity and a mixture of 100mm, 140mm and 215mm blockwork outer skin. Roof is roof trusses, sarking and slate. Currently I am at the timber frame stage. Heating will be oil boiler and wood burner and I am thinking of putting a couple of solar panels on the roof for hot water.
With this sort of house will there be any point in having the mechanical ventilation and do away with trickle vents or is that a drop in the ocean compared to the heat loss through the fabric of the building? I really wish I had got into this Passive House thing about 6 months ago but is it too late to make a difference?
Posted By: graecole... but it was considerably more than the 250 pounds per square metre I have seen mentioned here£250/m2 was a quote I got from Russell Timbertech of Glasgow, last summer, for 3G solid-timber trad Norwegian-style - i.e. one step down from Passivhaus standard. That co. always seems considerably cheaper than any of the others, and is fine, quality-wise, on 2 projects so far. I'd expect Internorm to come in almost double that price, for no real reason. However Russell aren't competitive for Al-faced, because their Al system is quite clunky.