Home  5  Books  5  GBEzine  5  News  5  HelpDesk  5  Register  5  GreenBuilding.co.uk
Not signed in (Sign In)

Categories



Green Building Bible, Fourth Edition
Green Building Bible, fourth edition (both books)
These two books are the perfect starting place to help you get to grips with one of the most vitally important aspects of our society - our homes and living environment.

PLEASE NOTE: A download link for Volume 1 will be sent to you by email and Volume 2 will be sent to you by post as a book.

Buy individually or both books together. Delivery is free!


powered by Surfing Waves




Vanilla 1.0.3 is a product of Lussumo. More Information: Documentation, Community Support.

Welcome to new Forum Visitors
Join the forum now and benefit from discussions with thousands of other green building fans and discounts on Green Building Press publications: Apply now.




  1.  
    Have found lots of conflicting values, up to about 1.1W/mK for Hemcrete. Nothing near to the LABC Certificate though so I think you must be right Tom, a misprint - If I were Tradical I would not be a very happy bunny at all.
    •  
      CommentAuthorfostertom
    • CommentTimeJan 23rd 2009
     
    Wot you saying Mike - Hemcrete really is .69W/mK? that makes it as conductive as solid brickwork.
  2.  
    No, I'm saying that most of the sources I have found give values between 0.07 and 0.11W/mK, which makes me wrong and you right [make the most of it] :bigsmile:

    In my defence, I did have an authoritative source [LABC Certificate] lol

    How on earth can LABC issue a Certificate for compliance [to 3 decimal place mind you] and get it so wrong. Its even got Lime Technology's name on it!
    •  
      CommentAuthorfostertom
    • CommentTimeJan 23rd 2009
     
    Good job nobody reads such documents!
    •  
      CommentAuthorfostertom
    • CommentTimeJan 23rd 2009
     
    Posted By: bellaExternal is out - the stone work is well cut 1860s of good design
    Is it thick, rubble backed, or thin, cut stone all through?
    Posted By: bellaSo cob walls good. Stone walls bad. My tent needs insulation
    No, massiveness is good and can be a fair substitute for U-value. Question is, is your wall effectively massive? If thick voidy rubble, then it's not - that's why you feel the need for 'insulation', while I don't in my cob house. The fundamental cure would be to grout your voids solid, and lime rather than cement grout can be used for that, so I started wondering whether a Hemcrete slurry could be used, to fill the voids, make the massiveness effective and add a bit of R as well. That might do it, maybe add a few inches of sprayed Hemcrete internally as well, as back page of http://www.limetechnology.co.uk/upload/documents/1201787723_the_thermal_performance_of_tradical_hemcrete.pdf.
    Posted By: bellaLets face it solid walls (except cob it seems) are hard to insulate
    Thin ones too pretty to insulate externally, yes; thick ones like yours (?) think massiveness instead of primarily insulation.
    • CommentAuthorbella
    • CommentTimeJan 24th 2009
     
    Is it thick, rubble backed, or thin, cut stone all through?

    All two skinned, rubble backed, local limestone (South Powys) 500 and 600mm. Cement pointed 30 years ago, fortunately falling out of it's own accord to reveal lime underneath. Refurb to include external re-do of stone work with lime pointing for "fancy" areas and rough cast for rubble gable-ends at back (were once slate hung but cement rendered at same time as pointing).

    thick ones like yours (?) think massiveness instead of primarily insulation.

    I would stick with massiveness if I thought a) could not significantly improve the rate of conductive heat loss to the walls by adding internal insulation, which could be of virtually the whole outside wall b) insulation would inevitably put the timbers at risk. I have only one opportunity to get it right. Foam would have real advantages (eg detailing round windows, light weight, access to awkward corners) but I recognise the dilemmas. I would really like to try it, perhaps alongside hemcrete. Is that approach practical or is it fantasy? Perhaps a combination of methods is needed.
    •  
      CommentAuthorfostertom
    • CommentTimeJan 24th 2009
     
    OK - I'd just say do the reading about Hemcrete - I must get round to it myself! Can't see mixing the two. Sprayed Hemcrete should do rounded arrises and tapering to windows at splayed reveals. State again your concerns and ways and means about joist ends? You have a real interest there, that others ignore.
    • CommentAuthorbella
    • CommentTimeJan 24th 2009
     
    <blockquote><cite>Posted By: fostertom</cite>State again your concerns and ways and means about joist ends? </blockquote>

    OK As I see it from reading/thinking/re-reading, and following this forum and AECB. The joist ends sit in the stone wall (as above, not cared for in best way but still sound structurally). The joists will be presenting cut ends to the wall and will be coldest even before putting in any insulation. So probably already prone to condensation (the old buidings literature documents this site as prone to timber failure). For my house this applies only to first floor so walls pretty dry at this level(solid floors at ground level) and at one end of joists (because two storey part of house abuts gable end of single storey area at right angles). If I put in insulation (any kind) the joist ends will inevitable get colder relative to much larger surface area of walls. If kept dry (hence lime or sheeps wool) or kept warm (Canadian idea) could this protect? Perhaps MHRV with slight negative pressure on living rooms would also help. Definitely no impervious materials to go next to wood or on walls but is semi-permeable foam permeable enough to allow movement of water vapour and surface evaporation via say lime plaster surface? Perhaps hemcrete "better" but certainly heavier, lower u value and more expensive. And my window reveals are chamfered as well as splayed and round topped. Can I cut hemcrete like the foam - probably not?

    I doubt that condensation analysis can predict what happens to my joist ends in my house and in my climate/occupation unless the programme used can enter specific data from the particular site in question. So my thinking is "Can I install X in limited area, monitor temperature and humidity behind/on X and at joist ends to measure what happens? Then abandon or proceed on all outside walls according to findings?
    • CommentAuthorharrylime
    • CommentTimeJun 24th 2009
     
    This is all wonderfully technical and clever! Get to the bottom of it all and we see one thing that makes sense. Moisture equals rot. John Riddout proved this many years ago when he started talking about the environment of our historic buildings and removing the root causes of decay.

    Salesmen are remarkable at proving their products are the very cureall we seek. Being simple and practical, I see only one solution, soft OSMOTIC materials that actively remove moisture and allow it to evaporate away. I do not believe that all that is 'breathable' is going to work in our favour! In most circs, capillary is terrible. Absorbancy & osmosis are the key, not adsorbancy or capillary.

    Seek to actively remove moisture out of a wall not pretend that because moisture is able to travel, that it will do what we want. Forget expanding foams, they cannot do what the sales teams promulgate.

    I have made a point of this technology for many years and have achieved wonderful results...including insulation.

    Simple material symbiosis.
    •  
      CommentAuthorfostertom
    • CommentTimeJun 25th 2009
     
    Remind us/me - what's osmosis?
    • CommentAuthorharrylime
    • CommentTimeJun 25th 2009
     
    Reading many of your comments on the forum, you should know!! Osmosis is the movement of moisture within a material to the driest point. Simply moisture in an osmotic material does not like to gather in greater concentration in one spot. If another spot is drier, then the moisture will try to equalise....keep drying that spot!
    •  
      CommentAuthorfostertom
    • CommentTimeJun 25th 2009 edited
     
    I do need reminding - does this apply to liquid moisture? I know it applies to vapour. What kind of force drives liquid to recoil from itself - surface tension? gravity?
    • CommentAuthorharrylime
    • CommentTimeJun 25th 2009
     
    This is where I prove that I am not a scientist...just a practical man with a brain.

    Is there surface tension in a liquid, when absorbed into a material? I doubt it. If the material into which it is absorbed is a dense one and there are no capillary tracts within it, is the moisture now liquid or vapour and in this instance is there any difference?
    •  
      CommentAuthorfostertom
    • CommentTimeJun 25th 2009
     
    No capillary tracts, i.e. interlinking crevices, then no liquid water content can enter a solid - unless it was there already, trapped in non-interlinking voids. Another way might be diffusion through membrane. Ah of course - 'reverse osmosis' - it is about diffusion through membrane.

    This is interesting. What kind of materials do you have in mind, hairylime? - perhaps your name's a clue!

    Would 'wicking' be another name for it? Of course a wick tends to stay damp, and therefore never allows its source to quite dry out, which it might if it wasn't poulticed with wick material.
    • CommentAuthorharrylime
    • CommentTimeJun 25th 2009
     
    Absorbant materials can be as deep as you like and dense. It believe that it could be described as a combination of whicking and osmosis. How thick is the membrane you mention? Why is it not any thickness/depth? Poulticing is how I see the way it works with a drying surface.

    Yup you guessed right but my bent is also the aggregates not just the lime, which is in reality a fairly ineffectual binder. The success comes from what we should add to it.
    • CommentAuthorbella
    • CommentTimeJun 25th 2009
     
    Posted By: harrylime just a practical man with a brain.


    Posted By: harrylime this technology for many years and have achieved wonderful results.


    OK, would you insulate a stone built house internally and if so how?
    • CommentAuthorharrylime
    • CommentTimeJun 28th 2009
     
    I have insulated a stone built mill internally when the client wanted solid walls. the walls were built from carbinferous limestone and were particularly cold to touch (suggesting high conductivity) I used a lime putty with a non conductive aggregate (ie silica avoided and dense impervious agg avoided) the whole, makes a material that feels warm at room temperature to touch. I also built iinto the mix lightweight insulating aggregates for low density volume and pump sprayed the mix 4 inches thick. I then simply skimmed the surface with again a non conductive aggregate and lime putty to finish. This has resulted in a lovely simple warmth to the building as is, however the results of energy consumption have yet to be confirmed as the building is a self uild and is not yet finished. We hope to record the inputs and losses etc.

    George Swanson in USA makes compelling arguments and debates the 'new term' "outsulation" in order to benefit from "outsulated thermal mass"

    I am enjoying reading everyones views!
    •  
      CommentAuthorfostertom
    • CommentTimeJun 29th 2009 edited
     
    Here's George Swanson's site http://www.geoswan.com/ - good stuff.

    But what you've just described, harrylime, isn't outsulation - but it is the best you can do if extg. external masonry face has to be left exposed. It keeps the whole thermal mass in contact with the interior. It's a Hemcrete technique too. Interesting to find someone who's tried it, and more interesting to get in-use performance data.
    •  
      CommentAuthordjh
    • CommentTimeJun 30th 2009
     
    harrylime wrote "Is there surface tension in a liquid, when absorbed into a material? I doubt it. If the material into which it is absorbed is a dense one and there are no capillary tracts within it, is the moisture now liquid or vapour and in this instance is there any difference?"

    Yes, there is surface tension in a liquid when absorbed in a material. It is what causes the capillary action that draws water through materials or wax through wicks. The surface tension of the thin layer of water surrounding each grain of earth or sand is what holds up sandcastles and cob walls.

    As Tom said, if there are no capillary tracks, liquid water can't enter the material but vapour may still be able to. "Breathable membrane", goretex, for example.

    Wikipedia is generally a good source of information. I find it especially useful to clarify how what I'm thinking matches with how the world talks about it.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Capillary_action
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wetting

    harrylime also wrote "Osmosis is the movement of moisture within a material to the driest point."

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Osmosis says something quite different: "Osmosis is the diffusion of water through a semi-permeable membrane, from a low concentrate solution (high water potential) to a highly concentrated solution (low water potential)".
    • CommentAuthorbella
    • CommentTimeJun 30th 2009
     
    Posted By: harrylimeI used a lime putty with a non conductive aggregate (ie silica avoided and dense impervious agg avoided) the whole, makes a material that feels warm at room temperature to touch. I also built iinto the mix lightweight insulating aggregates for low density volume and pump sprayed the mix 4 inches thick.


    Thank you for the response - but could you be a bit more specific? I don't know what "non-conductive aggregate" might be. I could guess what "lightweight insulating aggregates" might be but why not tell us?
    • CommentAuthorharrylime
    • CommentTimeJun 30th 2009
     
    Hi all. I am being deliberately questioning of conventional wisdom. If Omosis only is possible through a membrane, then what is to say how thick that membrane is? Materials work on a molecular level as well as a visible one, to the eye. water is only, surely, molecular. Are we saying that materials on a molecular level, mind how thick the membrane is? "ooh dear, not going in that, its too thick!"

    When I say non conductive I mean the types of material that do not conduct energy. Eg glass >light & heat..
    metal > heat & electric etc....... just think about it. Insulation made from non conductive materials not just low density for ****sake!

    To answer the question, "why not tell us" can be answered by the simple fact of - industrial secrets....Patents applied for.....and USP advantages of my company doing something different to the rest of our industry and slowly trying to prove my points, without being any sort of scientist- just a simple, practical person who observes in detail, the results of his work, over 20 plus years. I then go out and continue that thought with my next work, whilst not changing that which I have proved to myself.
    •  
      CommentAuthorfostertom
    • CommentTimeJul 1st 2009 edited
     
    Posted By: harrylimejust a simple, practical person who observes in detail, the results of his work, over 20 plus years
    Sounds like Viktor Schauberger - have you read him, harrylime. might just be contribute to your work.
Add your comments

    Username Password
  • Format comments as
 
   
The Ecobuilding Buzz
Site Map    |   Home    |   View Cart    |   Pressroom   |   Business   |   Links   
Logout    

© Green Building Press