Home  5  Books  5  GBEzine  5  News  5  HelpDesk  5  Register  5  GreenBuilding.co.uk
Not signed in (Sign In)

Categories



Green Building Bible, Fourth Edition
Green Building Bible, fourth edition (both books)
These two books are the perfect starting place to help you get to grips with one of the most vitally important aspects of our society - our homes and living environment.

PLEASE NOTE: A download link for Volume 1 will be sent to you by email and Volume 2 will be sent to you by post as a book.

Buy individually or both books together. Delivery is free!


powered by Surfing Waves




Vanilla 1.0.3 is a product of Lussumo. More Information: Documentation, Community Support.

Welcome to new Forum Visitors
Join the forum now and benefit from discussions with thousands of other green building fans and discounts on Green Building Press publications: Apply now.




  1.  
    Posted By: VictorianecoBasic dewpoint calculation required:

    What are the humidity levels of the room?
    What is the air temperature of the room?

    What is the temperature of the window/frame?

    Without these, just throwing guesses into 'wet thin air'


    Thanks Victorianeco. I'm going back tomorrow morning with (cheap) humidity monitor and thermometer gun. I will report back ...
  2.  
    Wow! so many comments in such a short time. I'm working my way through them. I was able to "quote" but that isn't working now, so:
    Victorianeco said "15c seems a little low in my opinion to leave a house, but then I don't know how long it is left empty for etc.

    Is it just one window or all of them?"

    The barn is only left for a few days. All the frames are showing condensation, but only the bifold is causing me concern as the other frames have tiled reveals.
  3.  
    Thank you so much for all the comments - much appreciated - particularly GreenPaddy, philedge and WillinAberdeen. I still can't quote, so
    tony: "Extractor fan left on in an airtight house will depressurise the house very slightly then keep it slightly depressurised but not shift any air 😢"

    I know there are probably a few imperfect seals and awkward areas where taping everything together was difficult, so I'm hoping that over aprox 200m2 there will be enough leakage pathways for the extractor fan to have an effect.

    I will see tomorrow morning!
    • CommentAuthorEd Davies
    • CommentTimeJan 5th 2021
     
    Posted By: chrisduncanI was able to "quote" but that isn't working now
    Yep, quoting only works directly from the last page of a thread.

    You can get the effect of quoting from a previous page but it's a bit tricky: do a quote of a small bit of text from the last page of the thread then copy and paste the text and the user name to replace them in the blockquote element. Easiest if you have the page you want to quote from and the last page of the thread open in different tabs. Ideally you can quote from the same person to save having to do the name bit; if not (i.e., if they haven't posted on the last page) it's probably best to do the user name first so you don't forget and cause confusion by misattributing the text.

    E.g., to do the following I quoted a word or two from your post above then copied and pasted the text (“So I think…main house”) from the previous page:

    Posted By: chrisduncanSo I think these are up to date frames. If anyone disagrees I would be interested to know as we are planning to use the same company for the new main house.
  4.  
    RobinB "FWIW we built an airtight home (under 1.8 ach), effective MVHR and yet we can get condensation overnight at the bottom of timber 3G windows behind thermal blinds in the kitchen. On other windows we get condensation on the outside of the glass. RH about 50%, typically 17/18 degrees by morning"

    That sounds awful! I don't want to spend several hundred thousand pounds to build a house only to find I have condensation (and possibly mould) on my windows.

    It matters slightly less to me in this converted barn as it is ancillary to the house, but I absolutely want to know the reasons so that I can be sure to avoid then when building the new house.
  5.  
    Thanks everyone! I feel honoured to have all these thoughtful comments. More info tomorrow once I see what the RH and temp of frames is when I arrive.
    • CommentAuthorbxman
    • CommentTimeJan 5th 2021
     
    when you check the temp of the window frames compare the inside temp of the aluminium with the outside temp of it .
  6.  
    Interesting that this came up - I just did an involuntary/accidental test on my house.

    Our airtightness was 1.72 m3/hr. 200m2. new build with 3g fibreglass framed windows.

    We've never had any noticeable condensation in 5 years on the inside (you do get some external condensation on the windows but that's a postive thing - it shows how well they're insulating from the house. It's only ever on the west facing windows early in the morning.

    The worst insulated part of the house is our opening roof hatch to the roof terrace - it has an insulated (but metal) upstaged and is only double glazed. However, normally, even if we use the bathroom near the roof hatch and bath with the door open we dont get any condensation that's an issue (ie never enough to drip and only momentary). Likewise, only tiny amounts on the 3g roof window in the bathroom itself.

    However, I turned our MVHR off on Saturday evening and didn't switch it back on until yesterday. With two people in the house and a few showers we did get enough condensation on the roof hatch upstand and window sufficient to drip off, but only on the roof hatch and not on any other windows.

    I wouldn't build another house without MVHR - the absence of condensation, ability to dry washing in the house without worrying about damp and having dry bathrooms and towels (without any heated rails) are big pluses for me. (also lack of noise from extractor fans). A small unit for your barn would seem a sensible addition.
    • CommentAuthorbhommels
    • CommentTimeJan 6th 2021 edited
     
    Posted By: Simon StillInteresting that this came up - I just did an involuntary/accidental test on my house.

    Our airtightness was 1.72 m3/hr. 200m2. new build with 3g fibreglass framed windows.

    So assuming an average ceiling height of 2.40m, your leak rate would be 1.72m3 for 200m2x2.4m=480m3, or 0.0036 ACH. Even if you made a typo and it is 1.72m3 on 200m3 it would be 0.0086 ACH which is frankly unbelievable. I think the ISS would be only slightly better. I suspect there is something wrong with your accidental measurement method.

    How did you arrive at these numbers? Were they taken at 50Pa pressure difference?
    • CommentAuthorborpin
    • CommentTimeJan 6th 2021 edited
     
    My air tightness at build was 0.72 m³/h/m² (from air tightness certificate) - design was "<10".

    MVHR runs such that (over a year) mean CO2 is 540 and mean RH is 43%.

    I do not see any condensation on my timber 3G windows.

    Posted By: Simon StillOur airtightness was 1.72 m3/hr. 200m2.
    Really? Mine was the best the guy had seen (granted 7 years ago) - that figure comes to 0.0086 m³/h/m².

    BTW ACH and m³/h/m² are different measurements. ACH relates to the number of Air Changes per Hour the MVHR achieves, not the airtightness.
    • CommentAuthorEd Davies
    • CommentTimeJan 6th 2021
     
    Posted By: Simon StillOur airtightness was 1.72 m3/hr
    Pretty sure that's meant to be 1.72 m³/m²/h.

    (Which is just 1.72 m/h, of course: the average speed of the air moving through the building envelope. I'm not sure why people need all the m³ and m² bits which obviously 2/3rds cancel.)

    200m2
    That's presumably the floor area of a reasonably large house. 200 m² for the surface area (which the 1.72 m³/m2/h value relates to) would be possible but quite small, e.g., for a square house with 2.4m room heights, 64 m² floor area for single storey or 84 m² for two storey.

    Posted By: borpinBTW ACH and m³/h/m² are different measurements.
    Yes. However, for any given building shape and size you can convert between them.

    ACH relates to the number of Air Changes per Hour the MVHR achieves, not the airtightness.
    No, AC/h can be used for the airtightness. Passivhaus does so, for example.

    Using AC/h for the airtightness represents the leakage better for both air quality and ventilation heat loss. On the other hand the “infiltration rate” (m³/m²/h) gives a better measure of the quality of the actual on-site build.

    For a given infiltration rate a perfectly spherical house will have a much lower air-change rate than one which is long and thin with lots of bumps (porches, dormers, etc) on it. In the extreme case, a house built by Benoit B Mandelbrot could have a very low infiltation rate but an arbitrarily large air-change rate.
    •  
      CommentAuthordjh
    • CommentTimeJan 6th 2021
     
    Posted By: borpinBTW ACH and m³/h/m² are different measurements. ACH relates to the number of Air Changes per Hour the MVHR achieves, not the airtightness.

    ACH and m³/h/m² are both measures of airtightness (n50 and q50 respectively at the normal regime of 50 Pa differential). The two numbers n50 and q50 and variants with higher pressure differences are used by various testing regimes. Notably, the UK SAP uses q50 whilst the PHI uses n50. The PHI also insists on both pressurisation and depressurisation during tests and pressure excursions up to 100 Pa.

    MVHR rates are usually expressed in units of m³/hr or l/s.

    MVHR rates can be related to the building volume using either of the airtightness units if desired.
    • CommentAuthortony
    • CommentTimeJan 6th 2021
     
    Newly converted, probably should wait 6 to 9 months then give a verdict
  7.  
    Here's the data to go with the original post. I got back this morning with a gun thermometer and a cheap RH meter.

    Air temp outside 2 deg +/- 1
    Air temp inside 14.5 deg +/- 0.5 (thermostats x 2 and gun agreed)
    aluminium bifold frame inside top (2m high) 12.5 deg
    aluminium bifold frame inside bottom(cill section) 8 deg
    glass 12 deg (not sure if the IR gun thermometer would measure this accurately)
    walls and ceiling all 14.5 deg
    entrance door (44mm thick plywood with honeycomb paper core) 12 deg

    RH was 60% on arrival and 59% after waving it around for 5 minutes. I'm not convinced of its accuracy.

    It's now 8 hours later and the RH is still showing 60%. Either it's not reading accurately or it's a coincidence, which it could be as it is 4 degrees warmer and I've been in the building for about 5 hours and boiled the kettle 3 times.

    Sorry to make you wait for it :bigsmile: but the really important bit (for me) was there was absolutely no sign of condensation anywhere on arrival, and there still isn't now. So to recap, this was after leaving the building to cool down from 19 to 15 degrees while I was away for 4 days with the bathroom extractor fan running permanently (thank you djh for that idea), and outside air temperature similar to before. So the previously damp air must have been gradually replaced with cold air from outside via leakage pathways, which when heated would then have been drier?

    What I take from the above is that the huge amount of condensation must have come from 2 people being in the barn for a couple of days with inadequate ventilation. I won't know for sure as I didn't have the RH meter then, but I will leave the fan off overnight and see what the condensation/RH levels are in the morning.

    So having just finished the build and wanting a long term cheap solution to potential future condensation risk (without major disruption), I'm thinking that perhaps I just replace the extractor fan with a humidistat extractor fan or possibly keep the existing fan and ask my electrician to wire in an override to turn it on when the outside air temp drops below a certain temperature. Are humidistat fans any good these days (I fitted one about 30 years ago and it was useless)?

    We had no perceived problem with air quality before it got cold, so I don't think I need a solution which operates all year round. However someone did mention CO2 levels. Is that something to be concerned about?

    I wait with bated breath for comments and suggestions about the fan solution (MEV?), or other options or calculations ... Thanks again - it's been fascinating reading everything so far.
    • CommentAuthortony
    • CommentTimeJan 6th 2021
     
    My rule of thumb known as Tony’s rule is that any surface at or below 12 C in a home is at risk of condensation.

    This should not be possible in a new well designed and detailed new or converted building.
  8.  
    Posted By: tonyMy rule of thumb known as Tony’s rule is that any surface at or below 12 C in a home is at risk of condensation.

    This should not be possible in a new well designed and detailed new or converted building.


    So how does that square with Smart Systems' (self declared on their website) comment "Smart has grown to become the UK’s leading supplier of aluminium glazing systems and bespoke aluminium extrusions"? Smart extrusions are used by large numbers of fabricators - 10 fabricators with 10 miles of centre of Bristol). Sections have a polyamide thermal break. Are they just not up to the job?
    • CommentAuthortony
    • CommentTimeJan 6th 2021
     
    Is the cold getting in through the thermal break or by a gap/draught or a non thermally broken frame member or sill?
    • CommentAuthorLF
    • CommentTimeJan 6th 2021
     
    What is spec on 24 mm double glazed panels ? Long shot - Is the glass in correct way around with soft coating on cavity side of inside pain of glass. Best glass is about half heat loss of old/worst double glazed units with no coatings and warm edge bits.

    When house is warm and you are by the doors is there a cold down flow of air going on near the windows ?

    I tend to see condensation on my double glazing on day when it first turns cold. House then dries as it pulls in colder drier air from outside - condensation is then reduced on windows on future cold days if it stays cold.

    I have just fitted a humidstat fan on bathroom refurb (Vent Axia Solo Pro SELV ) it seems OK ish. A bit slow to come on for my liking and a bit variable when it comes on versus RH meter. It has a switched live feed you could run off a temperature probe outside too. Like your idea there. Unit has manual override on little cord so you can keep it on when it and I find I use that on occasion.(eg when it drops cold)

    We have dehumidifier in bathroom for drying washing so this stops it running sometimes too.


    60% RH seems low for new build instinct rather than deep knowledge, thought it would be drying out ?
    60% when 4 degrees warmer is a fair increase in the % of water in the room than the 14 C at the start.
    • CommentAuthorEd Davies
    • CommentTimeJan 6th 2021
     
    Posted By: chrisduncanglass 12 deg (not sure if the IR gun thermometer would measure this accurately)
    IR thermometer readings of windows can be misleading. It's not, as you might be thinking, because they show the temperature of the outside through the window but rather because they can be reflective so see other things inside the room - e.g., the person holding them if they're pointed normal to the glass.
    • CommentAuthortony
    • CommentTimeJan 6th 2021
     
    Stick a piece of paper to the glass then fire the gun at that
  9.  
    With the room at 19oC and 60%RH, condensation will start to occur at 12oC.

    I take from your post that the temp reading is likely correct, but there's some doubt over the RH reading.

    My take on your posts and the photo of the condensation is...

    - you are not adequately ventilating the barn. I suspect the running ext fan will greatly improve that, and I'll have to amicably disagree with Tony on his suggestion that the barn will have no leakage paths to allow fortuitous ventilation due to the fan exhaust.

    - the main change in activity resulting in no visible condensation is running the extract fan. Keep it running whilst living in the house (maybe off whilst sleeping for noise issues), and if no condensation (or greatly reduced) whilst still around freezing outside, you've confirmed there was inadequate ventilation. How you go forward is a matter of debate of course.

    - any window frame will likely show condensation if you don't ventilate (forced/passive/breathing envelope...). With the room at 20oC, and an RH of 80% (quite humid), any hard surface at 16oC (which would be ok for a therm broken frame) will start to show condensation.

    - that said, I'm not convinced that the frames are doing a great job, but with the room at only 15oC, 12.5oC for the frames is not terrible. Measure the frame temps again once you've warmed the barn up internally.

    - Smart Systems website declaration may be true. Donald T's website declaration of his election victory may be true. As DJH might say - show me the evidence.
    •  
      CommentAuthordjh
    • CommentTimeJan 7th 2021
     
    Posted By: chrisduncanAir temp outside 2 deg +/- 1
    Air temp inside 14.5 deg +/- 0.5 (thermostats x 2 and gun agreed)

    OK, so the dew point was 6.5°C

    aluminium bifold frame inside top (2m high) 12.5 deg
    aluminium bifold frame inside bottom(cill section) 8 deg

    The top sounds quite reasonable, the bottom not so much. As Tony asked, is there some other possible heat path besides the frame itself? Otherwise maybe it's time to look at cross-sections and ask manufacturers etc.

    glass 12 deg (not sure if the IR gun thermometer would measure this accurately)

    As Ed already said, the trick is to put a bit of sticky tape on the glass, wait until the temperature equalizes and then measure that.

    walls and ceiling all 14.5 deg
    entrance door (44mm thick plywood with honeycomb paper core) 12 deg

    RH was 60% on arrival and 59% after waving it around for 5 minutes. I'm not convinced of its accuracy.

    Yeah, I've got several cheap RH meters and I stand them all together every now and then to try to convince myself of their relative accuracy. I also hired a calibrated meter once to check they were reasonable. Turns out they are generally fairly reliable, but not exact.

    It's now 8 hours later and the RH is still showing 60%. Either it's not reading accurately or it's a coincidence, which it could be as it is 4 degrees warmer and I've been in the building for about 5 hours and boiled the kettle 3 times.

    Could well be, the dew point will have shifted to 10.5°C or so in that case. Depending what exposed surfaces you have inside there'll be a greater or lesser extent of humidity buffering going on which will complicate things further but may well tend to keep the RH more constant than basic theory might predict.

    Longer term you can just open windows more when you are there and turn the heating up a bit so it doesn't get cold as a result. Or fit some combination of humidistat and thermostat to the extractor. I don't know what's available off the shelf.
    • CommentAuthorEd Davies
    • CommentTimeJan 7th 2021
     
    Posted By: djhDepending what exposed surfaces you have inside there'll be a greater or lesser extent of humidity buffering going on which will complicate things further but may well tend to keep the RH more constant than basic theory might predict.
    This is a good point which is often forgotten. My experience of monitoring RH in various rooms, most noticeably the kitchen, is that the RH has a particular value which it returns to fairly quickly after upsets such a boiling a kettle but this particular value varies quite slowly. It's not modified quickly by things like changes in the indoor temperature or outdoor absolute humidity but can be pulled up and down by longer term weather and things like running the dehumidifier for a while.

    My assumption is that this is because it's buffered by the humidity levels in the walls, etc. While a wall will have a particular absolute humidity (amount of liquid or adsorbed water per kilogram of plasterboard or whatever) what the evaporation and condensation processes will be directly controlled by is the relative humidity. A flat surface of pure water will tend to make the RH move towards 100% but the water in a wall is not pure and far from flat so it'll have its own effective RH. Expect that to change over a period of days or weeks.
  10.  
    Posted By: bhommels
    Posted By: Simon StillInteresting that this came up - I just did an involuntary/accidental test on my house.

    Our airtightness was 1.72 m3/hr. 200m2. new build with 3g fibreglass framed windows.

    So assuming an average ceiling height of 2.40m, your leak rate would be 1.72m3 for 200m2x2.4m=480m3, or 0.0036 ACH. Even if you made a typo and it is 1.72m3 on 200m3 it would be 0.0086 ACH which is frankly unbelievable. I think the ISS would be only slightly better. I suspect there is something wrong with your accidental measurement method.

    How did you arrive at these numbers? Were they taken at 50Pa pressure difference?


    Sorry - obviously wasn't sufficiently clear in what I'd written.

    The 'accidental test' was whether and where I would get condensation in my house if I didn't have an MVHR. As expected, on the worst insulated window though I was surprised that was the only place.

    The test result was from a properly done blow test at the end of construction and would was written as
    1.72 m3/(h.m2) @ 50 pascal
  11.  
    Posted By: GreenPaddyWith the room at 19oC and 60%RH, condensation will start to occur at 12oC.


    Do you use an online dew point calculator?
    • CommentAuthorchrisduncan
    • CommentTimeJan 7th 2021 edited
     
    Posted By: GreenPaddy
    - that said, I'm not convinced that the frames are doing a great job, but with the room at only 15oC, 12.5oC for the frames is not terrible. Measure the frame temps again once you've warmed the barn up internally.


    This afternoon, internal air temp 18 deg; outside -3 deg; top of frame 13.2 deg; bottom of frame 8.1 deg

    The temperature of the frame is consistent from top down to 400mm from floor, then drops 1 deg per 150mm and drops steeply for the last few mm. Do you think this is likely to be because cold air falls, or because there's worse thermal insulation in the cill? I will look at the Smart section drawings, but I think most of the sections use the same polyamide breaks.
    •  
      CommentAuthordjh
    • CommentTimeJan 7th 2021 edited
     
    Posted By: chrisduncanThe temperature of the frame is consistent from top down to 400mm from floor, then drops 1 deg per 150mm and drops steeply for the last few mm. Do you think this is likely to be because cold air falls, or because there's worse thermal insulation in the cill? I will look at the Smart section drawings, but I think most of the sections use the same polyamide breaks.

    I think it's likely to be a thermal bridge. Perhaps within the frame, or perhaps below it. Maybe air leak, maybe through the sill or track mechanism or whatever there is.

    To determine which, you might be able to measure the air temperature nearby, either with a 'room' thermometer or by placing a small object nearby and measuring its temperature with the infrared gun.

    edit: there should be thermal calculations of the Uw that show the whole thing in detail if you can prise them out of the manufacturer's sticky fingers (typically very difficult even when they claim PH compliance IME)
    • CommentAuthorchrisduncan
    • CommentTimeJan 7th 2021 edited
     
    I should also have said that I turned the extractor fan on again this morning and by this afternoon the condensation is starting to diminish.

    So:
    I can just run the extractor fan permanently when using the barn in cold weather. The fan at 16W won't cost much to run, but I will be paying to heat up an indeterminate amount of cold air seeping in to the barn from outside.

    I can change to a humidistat extractor that will only run while the RH is above a certain level, but I haven't found one yet. The Xpelair one will only kick in when humidity changes by more than 5% in 5 minutes (to avoid "unwanted operation" !!) and another will only operate above 60%RH. Can any of you recommend one?

    Or I can leave a window on the lockable night vent setting while we are here and put up with wasting heat and having cold draughts (you can tell this is my least favourite!).

    I am thinking that single room MVHR is probably overkill as the cost of one will probably never be recouped through lower heating costs vs just leaving the extractor fan running. But I will have to monitor gas use to check this.
    • CommentAuthorEd Davies
    • CommentTimeJan 7th 2021
     
    Posted By: chrisduncanSorry - I forgot to move the blockquote above. My comments are those following the first paragraph.
    You can still edit your post, just use the edit link in the top right corner of the post next to the quote link. It only appears on your own posts, of course.
  12.  
    Chris,

    I use a psychrometric graph, to determine dew point which gives the relationship between moisture, temp, hum, enthalpy, entropy, and all sorts. It takes a little getting used to, but there are little tutorials as to how to use the basic elements of the graph. That's quite different from dew point calculators looking at interstitial condensation.

    I tend to agree that changing the fan will have its own carbon footprint, which might not be outweighed by running the existing fan when needed. When is "when needed"? You could add a remote humidistat to the existing fan, maybe something like this...
    https://crwltd.co.uk/extractor-fan-inline-bathroom-run-on-timer--humidity-sensor-switch-socket-2335-p.asp?

    What is it you're trying to control? RH in the bathroom, at the window...You might want to be able to de-activated it so it can't come on at night, as say room temp falls, and RH rises. I think I might just put a timer on it, and be done with it. Increase the time period if you see a bit more cond. Off between 10pm and 7am, or what ever.

    That doesn't really help with the main thrust of your question - how to not repeat this in the house. As others have said, you have a cold bridge at the foot of the window. It may be resting on the metal cill, and bridging the cavity. So metal cill from inside to out, and possibly cold air directly underneath from cavity. Is the cill thermally broken? Is the unit sitting on insulation? Door thresholds and floor based window cill details are often a problem. Been discussed on here before - basically need to buy some expensive high compressive strength insulation. But you don't need a lot of it, so not so bad. Just getting the builders to be bothered following the detail in the underbuild is tricky. I sometimes don't bother telling them, and just cut out the few blocks and insert at the appropriate time (or note on the drawing to leave the block course out at that area).
   
The Ecobuilding Buzz
Site Map    |   Home    |   View Cart    |   Pressroom   |   Business   |   Links   
Logout    

© Green Building Press