Home  5  Books  5  GBEzine  5  News  5  HelpDesk  5  Register  5  GreenBuilding.co.uk
Not signed in (Sign In)

Categories



Green Building Bible, Fourth Edition
Green Building Bible, fourth edition (both books)
These two books are the perfect starting place to help you get to grips with one of the most vitally important aspects of our society - our homes and living environment.

PLEASE NOTE: A download link for Volume 1 will be sent to you by email and Volume 2 will be sent to you by post as a book.

Buy individually or both books together. Delivery is free!


powered by Surfing Waves




Vanilla 1.0.3 is a product of Lussumo. More Information: Documentation, Community Support.

Welcome to new Forum Visitors
Join the forum now and benefit from discussions with thousands of other green building fans and discounts on Green Building Press publications: Apply now.




  1.  
    "California, long cold coastline, mountains, geothermal close to surface, huge lakes and rivers (some redirected), vast urbanisation, horrendous smogs and forest fires, just the kind of place to study global climate change."

    While this is not entirely correct you are right that these man made conditions make California perfect for studying UHI. As presented in the map, vast areas of California that have remained low density/undeveloped/wilderness, show no significant warming over the 20th century.
    If there was was significant AGW due to pollution/CO2 this is precisly where you would see it because of its varied geographical nature. Where there has been massive urbanisation over the century, there we see a heat signal.

    As for the methods of data collection, it is based on the same historical data used by HadCrue/Hanson/Mann etc for their climate models. The only difference being that they have heavily adjusted the data.

    I can show you weather station data from all over the world that shows the same effect, especialy data collected in remote areas such as Greenland the Artic or Antartica where the weather stations are always sighted on airports!
  2.  
    New Zealands "official" climate record has been presented since 1993 using only 7 surface stations with data going back to the 1850s.
    The NZ met office has "corrected" the raw data since 1993 producing this graph:
  3.  
    While the same data but un"corrected" tells this rather different story...
  4.  
    Arctic circle urban weather station temperature records....
  5.  
    While weather stations outside urbanised areas, isolated away from UHI effects in the arctic circle show no significant warming for the 20th C:
    • CommentAuthorowlman
    • CommentTimeOct 17th 2010
     
    Surely they have a reason for adjusting the NZ readings. Are you suggesting they shouldn't?
  6.  
    "Niwa sued over data accuracy

    The country’s state-owned weather and atmospheric research body NIWA is being taken to court in a challenge over the accuracy of its data used to calculate global warming.

    "Coalition spokesman Bryan Leyland said many scientists believed although the earth had been warming for 150 years, it had not heated as much as Government archives claimed.

    He said the New Zealand Meteorological Service had shown no warming during the past century but Niwa had adjusted its records to show a warming trend of 1degC. The warming figure was high and almost 50 percent above the global average, said Mr Leyland.

    “The New Zealand Met Service record shows no warming during the last century, but NIWA has adopted a series of invariably downward adjustments in the period prior to World War 2. Because these move the old temperature records downwards, the 7SS NZTR shows a huge bounce-back of over 1°C in the first half of the century” said Mr
    Leyland. “Although this is out of line with dozens of other records, and has been the subject of sustained questioning by both the New Zealand Climate Science Coalition and the ACT party, NIWA refuses to accept that there are serious problems with the adjustments. In fact, no one has been able to explain exactly how they were
    arrived at.”
    • CommentAuthorjamesingram
    • CommentTimeOct 17th 2010 edited
     
    Interesting, always lots of doubtful info floating about.
    What do you think about bringing permaculture ideas into the corporate world , and attempting to inspire
    people to re-think, re-design and build a sustainable future.
    •  
      CommentAuthorfostertom
    • CommentTimeOct 17th 2010
     
    That's right james - bringing us back to topic.
  7.  
    Lol, truth hurts....
    • CommentAuthorowlman
    • CommentTimeOct 18th 2010
     
    Posted By: jamesingram.
    What do you think about bringing permaculture ideas into the corporate world , and attempting to inspire
    people to re-think, re-design and build a sustainable future.

    The proletariat would probably accept it, not much to loose. The further up the food chain we get the more resistance you'd meet. Yes, on reflection start at the top and work down.
    • CommentAuthorJoiner
    • CommentTimeOct 18th 2010 edited
     
    "Very good.
    Still misses out the final step - the sustainable economy must not only do the above, but also all its works must be designed to positively assist the planet and its plants to clear up the existing mess we've made - to recharge depleted resource banks and reinstate 'environmental services', to do within decades or centuries what left to itself would take centuries or millenia."

    I think all bdp is trying to do is point out that before you go out with a bucket and spade to clear up the "mess we've made" it's sensible to know how big a pile of shit you're having to deal with in order to take enough buckets to carry it away in. If the information you've been given is suspect then you could end up taking a bucket too many which could have been used elsewhere to better effect.
    •  
      CommentAuthorfostertom
    • CommentTimeOct 18th 2010 edited
     
    It doesn't matter how much shit's already there, or why or how.

    First is to
    a) stop accumulating more, which was the start of this thread, or at least
    b) reduce the accumulation to a rate that the planet's 'environmental services' can handle. About 1980, we crossed that threshold http://www.footprintnetwork.org/en/index.php/GFN/page/earth_overshoot_day/

    Beyond that, the sustainability of the human race's existence on earth depends upon either
    c) leaving the planet and its plants to clear up the shit, or
    d) as c) but co-operating actively in facilitating c).

    It's not that we humans have to get out there with our limited supply of buckets - we humans (in fact we animals) can't do the job - only the planet and its plants can. We just have to get out of the planet's way, or even co-operate with it.

    d) isn't a proposition that needs scientific verification - it's a state of awareness that some people, even on this forum, immediately start denying.

    Lao Tzu, he say "The best way to run the world is to let it take its course - and to get yourself out of its way. Hua!"
    • CommentAuthorjamesingram
    • CommentTimeOct 18th 2010 edited
     
    I agree with Tom above . Learn how to co-operate with our planet.

    posted by owlman "What I can't get out of my head however, is the painfully slow implementation of anything approaching a solution, and, the inexorable human population rise, and it's consequential demand; for everything; homes, travel, trinkets, food. One step forward two steps back. "

    Yes this definitely seems to be how things currently work.

    If you could get the corporate and science community to see the long term value to their business of something like the cradle to cradle approach ( if it in fact does have a commercial one ? ) and they start to
    use these ideas from day one in the design, this will have more effect than any attempted government or individual actions.
    Time scale and specific details seem unimportant , this process may well take decades even century's
    its more about a way of looking at design and stimulating a process .
    It may well turn out to be practically unfeasible and the desire may well not be there .

    Corporate have other priorities , such as their commercial survival , but when you start to talk of resources for production and profit , they will need these. If it's possible, a circular economy of technical nutrients will allow them to continue to trade and produce product. As we have finite resource available ( other than solar ? ) It will at some point in the future be in their interests to invest in these ideas.
  8.  
    Video of some of the lectures from
    Bradford 10+1 international conference
    "The Ellen MacArthur Foundation is joining forces with Bradford University to run a two day international conference on closed loop thinking."
    http://www.ellenmacarthurfoundation.org/videos
    Waste as Future Feedstock , Speaker: James Clark, Green Chemistry Group, University of York
    http://www.ellenmacarthurfoundation.org/videos?video=Waste%20as%20Future%20Feedstock%20-%20%20Part%201
    •  
      CommentAuthorfostertom
    • CommentTimeJan 3rd 2011
     
    Very good - I'll try to find time ...
  9.  
    http://www.ellenmacarthurfoundation.org/videos?video=Waste%20as%20Future%20Feedstock%20-%20%20Part%202
    11.45 minutes , "elemental unsustainabilty, we are running out of key elements"
    • CommentAuthorjamesingram
    • CommentTimeJan 3rd 2011 edited
     
    Some talk here of the need to get away from the idea of reducing ones footprint
    and working towards making a posistive footprint with design or action . 'Eco-effectiveness'
    part 4 10min. in.
    http://www.ellenmacarthurfoundation.org/videos?video=A%20Cradle%20to%20Cradle%20perspective%20-%20Part%201
    starts here.
    • CommentAuthorjamesingram
    • CommentTimeJan 6th 2011 edited
     
    Interesting example in one of the talks of a carpet tile manifacturer showing growth in turn over and profit
    over the last few years , through this recession , bucking the downward trend of thier competiors , which the CEO puts down to the companys goal and attempts to move towards the cradle to cradle approach in thier manifacturering processes and business ethos

    By changing production materials and offering end of life collection and reprocessing its placed its raw material in a closed loop , removing the need to source new materials for future production
  10.  
    They also offer to reprocess thier competitor tiles, opening up a new material source / revenue for them.
    fibre goes for reprocessing , wool to compost , bitumen to road production.
    Not perfect but a good example of what can be done .
    Apparently all the UK all carpet currently goes straight to landfill
    • CommentAuthorjamesingram
    • CommentTimeDec 23rd 2012 edited
     
    Venlo: First cradle-to-cradle region in the world

    "The Venlo-region in the south-east of the Netherlands, bordering Germany, is developing initiatives at different scales which can test the concepts of Cradle-to-cradle at a regional scale. The intention is to boost social, economic and environmental welfare internally in the region whilst at the same time creating a knowledge base which can be exported across Europe and internationally."

    http://www.dac.dk/en/dac-cities/sustainable-cities-2/all-cases/master-plan/venlo-first-cradle-to-cradle-region-in-the-world/?bbredirect=true
    • CommentAuthorjamesingram
    • CommentTimeDec 28th 2012 edited
     
    "the EU has no choice but to go for the transition to a resource-efficient & ultimately regenerative circular economy" http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_MEMO-12-989_en.htm
  11.  
    http://circulareconomy.wikispaces.com/
    "Words ought to be a little wild for they are the assault of thoughts on the unthinking. - J M Keynes

    Welcome to our Wikispace. One overview and a largely borrowed glossary, five sections with a total of 20 briefings which will be followed by 20 videos and a scattering of workshop ideas for exemplification.
    Each can be a stand alone topic but there are deeper relationships, as befits the notion of relational thinking. The choice of a boundary and these particular categories is not an attempt at a studious comprehensiveness but it is, hopefully, enough of a narrative if read in the round to be of assistance to those interested in the basics of the circular economy.
    We wanted to be able to move from the abstract (systems thinking) to the practical outworking (whole systems design) and then through ‘energy and materials’ – as deservedly a pairing as what follows: ‘products and services’ and finally to the great facilitators of human endeavour ‘money..’ and the messaging which is ‘…prices’.
    Contributions have been made by a number of authors and each has their own emphasis and boundary in mind. These differences have not been subject to extensive editing and represent what is always the case: variations of interpretation within patterns and themes. As well as rejecting a formulaic approach to the parts there is also an impermanence about them. In any event this is, of course, a wiki and edits and clarifications are most welcome. Updates will be frequent and anyone who feels they have a much better candidate for any section should feel free to submit it."
    • CommentAuthorjamesingram
    • CommentTimeNov 11th 2013 edited
     
    .http://www.ellenmacarthurfoundation.org/circular-economy/explore_more/think-differently-1/engineering-the-circular-economy

    ch1 .Through good design we can make laptops that can be disassembled in less than two minutes to enable recovery of valuable components and materials. What principals need to be applied to make this work and what are the best examples in the market? How does this translate into real economic value for manufacturers and how does it work at scale

    ch2 .A key principle of the circular economy is ‘tight circles’ – recirculating products and materials with little change for fast return to productive use with minimal energy expenditure. In this chapter, we learn more about how this works for businesses by looking at today’s remanufacturing practices
  12.  
    Circular Economy Reports
    http://www.ellenmacarthurfoundation.org/business/reports

    As part of the Ellen MacArthur Foundation’s mission to accelerate the transition to the circular economy, we have conducted analysis and published the first ever report series highlighting the economic rationale for the transition to a circular economy – an opportunity in excess of 2 trillion USD for the global economy
    •  
      CommentAuthorfostertom
    • CommentTimeNov 11th 2013
     
    Same good-for-biz vibe as RMI!
  13.  
    RMI ? Retail Marketing international , Retail motor industry or Rocky mountain institute
    I guess the last one , yes no point preaching to the convert ( like we may be here) It's those in big business that need help steering back to course :bigsmile:
Add your comments

    Username Password
  • Format comments as
 
   
The Ecobuilding Buzz
Site Map    |   Home    |   View Cart    |   Pressroom   |   Business   |   Links   
Logout    

© Green Building Press