Green Building Bible, Fourth Edition |
![]() |
These two books are the perfect starting place to help you get to grips with one of the most vitally important aspects of our society - our homes and living environment. PLEASE NOTE: A download link for Volume 1 will be sent to you by email and Volume 2 will be sent to you by post as a book. |
Vanilla 1.0.3 is a product of Lussumo. More Information: Documentation, Community Support.
Posted By: owlmanI'd looked at a few systems, at a glance this seems to be the most sophisticated.
http://www.powerflowenergy.com/company/
Posted By: owlman…at a glance this seems to be the most sophisticated.What particular sophistication of these is good in your case?
Posted By: owlmanEd: it was the ability to automatically switch/prioritise the loads, especially smaller UFH cable areas, according to need, that I thought neat,Ah, that makes sense. I read the main pages on each of the units but didn't dig into the detailed specifications. You'd have thought they'd have emphasized that up front, or did I miss it in their waffle?
Posted By: WillInAberdeenIf it costs £1500 and saves you £150 for 10 years, you'd be left at the end with £1500, so that's 0% simple return on your investment.You'd also be left with £1000 worth of cables in the floor for use during the next ten years, one hopes.
My view is these diverter boxes are only economic to enable one to play games with the FIT and lack of export metering, at the expense of all other bill payers.Diverters are irrelevant to FiT. Unless this is a quite recent installation the export rate is also not large so the presence or otherwise of export metering doesn't make a huge difference but, yes, if there was an export meter you'd need to subtract the lost export payment from the price of gas saved if really counting the pennies.
1 to 13 of 13