Home  5  Books  5  GBEzine  5  News  5  HelpDesk  5  Register  5  GreenBuilding.co.uk
Not signed in (Sign In)

Categories



Green Building Bible, Fourth Edition
Green Building Bible, fourth edition (both books)
These two books are the perfect starting place to help you get to grips with one of the most vitally important aspects of our society - our homes and living environment.

PLEASE NOTE: A download link for Volume 1 will be sent to you by email and Volume 2 will be sent to you by post as a book.

Buy individually or both books together. Delivery is free!


powered by Surfing Waves




Vanilla 1.0.3 is a product of Lussumo. More Information: Documentation, Community Support.

Welcome to new Forum Visitors
Join the forum now and benefit from discussions with thousands of other green building fans and discounts on Green Building Press publications: Apply now.




  1.  
    Hi,
    I wondered if anyone would like to help me check my calculations?

    We have an ASHP that runs 24/7 at 45 litres per second. The average yearly outdoor temp for where we live is 8 degrees C. We like to have a room temperature of 21 degrees C.

    When in my (swedish) college, to calculate the energy requirement to heat intake air, we used this formula

    P [kW] = q [m3/s] x R [kg/m3] x delta T [degrees C]

    where:

    R = 1.2
    delta T = indoor temp - average outdoor temp

    We'd then multiply the result by 8766 hours to get the (approximate) yearly requirement in kWh.

    So for my house, that would give:

    P = 0.045 x 1.2 x (21 - 8)
    = 0.702 kW

    0.702 kW x 8766 hours = 6154 kWh.

    Sounds reasonable?
    • CommentAuthorEd Davies
    • CommentTimeApr 9th 2022
     
    Yes, that looks reasonable to me as far as it goes.

    The 0.045 m³/s presumably comes from something like 150m² floor area x 2.4m room height x 0.45 air changes per hour / 3600 seconds/hour? As often discussed here, 0.45 AC/h is probably on the high side for average operation.

    The formula: P [kW] = q [m3/s] x R [kg/m3] x delta T [degrees C]

    works but is poorly formed as the units don't match. It omits the specific heat capacity of air which, at common temperatures and pressures, is around 1 kJ/(kg·K) so it happens to come out right numerically.

    Still 700 W continuously all year is a bit of a pain. Better have some heat recovery, I think.
  2.  
    Thanks Ed :)

    I see that once again I've misremembered the English acronyms - we have an EAHP, not a ASHP, although I guess that exhaust air is an air source ... Anyway, yes, we have heat recovery.

    Ah yes, 1 kJ/(kg·K) that was in the original lecture notes, but the teachers had removed it from the revision sheets. Presumably as we were using 1 kJ ...

    The 45 l/s comes from the fan setting on the heatpump - we can choose between 20 l/s up to around 70 or 80 l/s. Our house is 115 m2, but 45 l/s seems to work for the four of us, - it's a compromise, as we cannot vary the flow - 45 l/s clears the bathroom reasonably quickly, and we get ok heat recovery; at higher flows we get rather "dried out" eyes, noses, etc.

    I'm doing the calculations as our house (mid 1980s) originally had MVHR (and presumably an electric heater for heating and hot water); I'm contemplating reinstalling MVHR, so this helps with dimensioning (?) any unit we may buy. I agree that 0.45 AC/h is high, so would hopefully get something that senses the bathroom and kitchen humidity (maybe even VOCs)

    Need to do heat loss through the building now ... :)
    • CommentAuthorEd Davies
    • CommentTimeApr 9th 2022
     
    Posted By: minisaurusAnyway, yes, we have heat recovery.
    Oops, yes, read that then forgot about it while concentrating on the details.
Add your comments

    Username Password
  • Format comments as
 
   
The Ecobuilding Buzz
Site Map    |   Home    |   View Cart    |   Pressroom   |   Business   |   Links   
Logout    

© Green Building Press