Green Building Bible, Fourth Edition |
![]() |
These two books are the perfect starting place to help you get to grips with one of the most vitally important aspects of our society - our homes and living environment. PLEASE NOTE: A download link for Volume 1 will be sent to you by email and Volume 2 will be sent to you by post as a book. |
Vanilla 1.0.3 is a product of Lussumo. More Information: Documentation, Community Support.
Posted By: WillInAberdeen*another* jumper.
An internal partition wall or intermediate floor with acoustic wool in it, has a U-value about 0.5, which is well able to maintain a temperature difference of say 3 degrees between say a lounge and a bedroom, given that the external walls can maintain a difference of up to 25deg from inside to outside.
I like a bedroom to be say 21deg in the evening, maybe 15-17deg overnight, and about 19deg when I wake up. I like a lounge to be unheated overnight and through the day, and perhaps 21deg in the evening. By tweaking the timing of the different zones, I can just about do this, but it needs luck and lots of tweaking. Shouldn't be difficult for controllers to just do this, don't know why they don't. Most cars can organise different temperatures for the driver and passenger.
Posted By: WillInAberdeenSome people like stable temperature, others like control, it should be possible to design efficient housing for both.
Posted By: WillInAberdeenSimon, ...... the upper rooms' temperatures can diverge from downstairs, but by (only) a few degrees, as you mentioned. Do the walls also have much mass inside the insulation envelope?
..
Do you have self closing firedoors off the stairwell because of the 3rd storey? We close all our stairwell doors but only at night.
Posted By: djh
Frankly I have trouble believing anybody who says they need their bedroom at say 17°C to sleep. Do they do that with just a sheet over them? And if not, why can't they allow a warmer temperature and reduce the coverings? I think it's a learned prejudice that can be unlearned.
I'm with you on this - we could have saved money and not installed the UFH in the bedrooms but there are significant parts of the world where ambient nighttime temperatures could be 20C. We now have 'summer weight' (I think 4.5 tog) duvets rather for winter and sheets for summer.
Posted By: djhFrankly I have trouble believing anybody who says they need their bedroom at say 17°C to sleep. … I think it's a learned prejudice that can be unlearned.I agree. I suspect it's because people want fresh air in the bedroom and associate that with being a bit chillier than they'd put up with in the rest of the house. Of course, with MVHR…
Posted By: Ed DaviesPosted By: djhFrankly I have trouble believing anybody who says they need their bedroom at say 17°C to sleep. … I think it's a learned prejudice that can be unlearned.I agree. I suspect it's because people want fresh air in the bedroom and associate that with being a bit chillier than they'd put up with in the rest of the house. Of course, with MVHR…
Posted By: djh
It's also not possible to build different types of houses for people who want control versus people who want stability since one would hope that the building will have more than one set of occupants during its lifetime, typically many more. Unless of course you propose segregated housing for people who want fine control over individual room temperatures.
Posted By: meYour taste may differ and that's fine
Posted By: Ed DaviesThe way I look at this control thing in general is:
1) if you have a short thermal time constant (i.e., thermally lightweight house and/or relatively poor insulation) then you want the control system to optimize when you heat so that the house isn't unnecessarily warm, and therefore leaking more heat than it needs to, for much of the time.
2) if you have a long thermal time constant (i.e., a lot of heat storage and good insulation) and a variable source of heating (e.g., variable electricity tariffs, solar of some sort or other, ASHP working from different outdoor conditions) then you want a control system to optimize when you take in energy in the most efficient manner.
3) if you have a long thermal time constant and a non-variable source of heating (e.g., a gas or oil boiler) then it doesn't really matter - a system as simple as an “always-on” thermostat will do.
Posted By: WillInAberdeenNo, it's the other way round, your circadian clock is naturally set by both light and temperature cycles. You might have trained yourself to sleep with the lights on or in constant temperature environments, but I think that is unwise, it's not how our biology is supposed to work. It's more of an issue up North as we have short daylight in the winter, some colleagues have to sit in front of SAD lamps.
If you are experiencing trouble with beliefs, or have some prejudices you wish to unlearn, a brief Google will help you out, eg
https://www.nature.com/articles/nature25740
”Abstract
Circadian clocks coordinate behaviour, physiology and metabolism with Earth’s diurnal cycle1,2. These clocks entrain to both light and temperature cycles3, and daily environmental temperature oscillations probably contribute to human sleep patterns”
Or https://sleepcouncil.org.uk/advice-support/sleep-advice/7-steps-to-a-better-nights-sleep/
"1. Your Bedroom... We recommend a cool temperature of around 16-18° C "