Home  5  Books  5  GBEzine  5  News  5  HelpDesk  5  Register  5  GreenBuilding.co.uk
Not signed in (Sign In)

Categories



Green Building Bible, Fourth Edition
Green Building Bible, fourth edition (both books)
These two books are the perfect starting place to help you get to grips with one of the most vitally important aspects of our society - our homes and living environment.

PLEASE NOTE: A download link for Volume 1 will be sent to you by email and Volume 2 will be sent to you by post as a book.

Buy individually or both books together. Delivery is free!


powered by Surfing Waves




Vanilla 1.0.3 is a product of Lussumo. More Information: Documentation, Community Support.

Welcome to new Forum Visitors
Join the forum now and benefit from discussions with thousands of other green building fans and discounts on Green Building Press publications: Apply now.




    • CommentAuthorPugliese
    • CommentTimeAug 2nd 2012
     
    Just had my initial SAP assessment back and it is fully compliant with L1A.

    Should I be concerned that there are apparent errors like 6 x air changes when it should be 0.6 or the fact that it will all come out in the post build SAP, shall I just move on.

    It has been mentioned on this forum that as a tool for assessing our heating needs it is not much good, so I am wondering if analysing it all and picking up all the errors is really worth it.

    Also is there a list anywhere of target values for CO2 emissions, fabric heat loss and Space heating requirement per m² (kWh/m²/year)? It would be nice to understand how the house compares to the norm.
    • CommentAuthorEd Davies
    • CommentTimeAug 2nd 2012
     
    Posted By: PuglieseShould I be concerned that there are apparent errors like 6 x air changes when it should be 0.6

    Any possibility that's due to confusion between target 50 Pa (blower-door test) and “in operation” rates?
    • CommentAuthorPugliese
    • CommentTimeAug 2nd 2012
     
    Posted By: Ed Davies
    Posted By: PuglieseShould I be concerned that there are apparent errors like 6 x air changes when it should be 0.6

    Any possibility that's due to confusion between target 50 Pa (blower-door test) and “in operation” rates?


    No, just spoken to the assessor and they decided that 0.6 was very hard to achieve and by putting in 6 the house was still fully compliant, so gave us 'wriggle room' on the final SAP - I suppose it is a bit of forward thinking but they could have told me!
    • CommentAuthorTimber
    • CommentTimeAug 2nd 2012
     
    I suggest that the 0.6 ach vs 6 used in the SAP are different values. 0.6Ach isn't the same as 0.6 m3/m2/hr @ 50pa (AFAIK m3/m2 is used in SAP rather than ACH).

    0.6m3/m2/hr @ 50pa would be quite hard to achieve unless you are super anal about detailing and on-site build quality. A SAP target of 2 or 3 might be better for design purposes, and aim to beat in the final test.

    BUT this is all from memory, so someone might correct me on this.
Add your comments

    Username Password
  • Format comments as
 
   
The Ecobuilding Buzz
Site Map    |   Home    |   View Cart    |   Pressroom   |   Business   |   Links   
Logout    

© Green Building Press