Green Building Bible, Fourth Edition |
![]() |
These two books are the perfect starting place to help you get to grips with one of the most vitally important aspects of our society - our homes and living environment. PLEASE NOTE: A download link for Volume 1 will be sent to you by email and Volume 2 will be sent to you by post as a book. |
Vanilla 1.0.3 is a product of Lussumo. More Information: Documentation, Community Support.
Posted By: VictorianecoWe would like to maintain the brick facadeSeems heavy consequences. Any photos?
Posted By: Dominic CooneyThe bricks don't look anything special to me. I would not be precious about these.Agree. The large eves overhang is just crying out for EWI. Best done while the windows are being replaced.
Posted By: Nick ParsonsSimonD said ''If you were to look at a lime render for the ewi then Lime Green is the only company I know at the moment who have developed a lime render system for woodfibre ewi."
SimonD, are you ruling out the Baumit products because the EWI render (MC55) apparently contains a very small proportion of cement? I don't know the proportions but I think it is predominantly llime, but not pure lime? It's great to use.
Fassa do a lime render for use with graphite EPS.
Posted By: John WalshLooks like there's the potential to slightly reduce ground level and thus EWI below ground floor levelNo need, for downstand insulation purposes - much more effective is to dig a trench right down to bottom of foundation (but abs no deeper, to avoid undermining the found or reducing its bearing area) and run the EWI right down as deep as that allows. This creates a 'coffer dam' of insulation around a large block of subsoil, which then becomes a slow-changing stabilising thermal mass, part of the house's internal environment. To maximise insulation value, you can prevent standing water in the trench by putting a french drain in the bottom, with sharp clean aggregate and geotextile to prevent silting.
Posted By: John WalshLook into digging out the existing concrete floorsAnd it goes a long way to making that unnecessary, which is a boon when you don't have to rip out kitchen, cloakroom etc, not even carpets.
Posted By: fostertomdig a trench right down to bottom of foundation (but abs no deeper, to avoid undermining the found or reducing its bearing area) and run the EWI right down as deep as that allows. This creates a 'coffer dam' of insulation around a large block of subsoil, which then becomes a slow-changing stabilising thermal mass, part of the house's internal environment. ... This floor insulation won't be as good as you could achieve with a new replacement floor, but could be a worthwhile trade-off. See latter part of http://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=6562 where an02ew applies Therm to quantifying it.
I used to think that the underground EWI needn't be as thick as above - but now realise that the reverse is true - make it at least as thick if not more.
Posted By: WillInAberdeendidn't really look like enough insulationTrue but as I say
Posted By: fostertomwon't be as good as you could achieve with a new replacement floor, but could be a worthwhile trade-off ... when you don't have to rip out kitchen, cloakroom etc, not even carpets.
Posted By: WillInAberdeenthe heat wasn't getting through the insulated trench, so it didn't need thicker insulationNot getting through *because* of the insulation - there must be an optimum thickness.
Posted By: WillInAberdeenthe trench needs to be metres deep if it's going to meaningfully lengthen the heat flow path from the floor to the outside air0.6m is questionably not worth it - 0.75m is minimum found depth for postwar houses, now 0.9m. Even 0.6m increases path length from almost nothing (if the wall is thermally 'part of' the floor slab) to about 1.7m - but the path length is always partly short-cut by heat leakage through the downstand insulation.
1 to 19 of 19