Green Building Bible, Fourth Edition |
![]() |
These two books are the perfect starting place to help you get to grips with one of the most vitally important aspects of our society - our homes and living environment. PLEASE NOTE: A download link for Volume 1 will be sent to you by email and Volume 2 will be sent to you by post as a book. |
Vanilla 1.0.3 is a product of Lussumo. More Information: Documentation, Community Support.
Posted By: tonyWhat does he think happens to the other 2% ??? -- it is all converted to heat.What about the light that escapes out of the windows?
The highest efficacy theoretically attainable (i.e., 100%) is 685 lumens per watt, the same which could be obtained if all the input power were converted to green light at a 555 nm wavelength, the number to which the human eye is most sensitive.
The maximum theoretical efficacy of any white, light-producing source, one with its entire output power distributed uniformly (with respect to wavelength) in the visible region, is only 200 lumens per watt. Thus, by concentrating any light source’s output wavelength in close proximity to the 555 nm point, we can improve the efficacy beyond that possible with “perfect” white light, that comprising all visible wavelengths, with an equal amount of power in each wavelength.
The efficacy of average present-day fluorescent lamps is about 60 to 70 lm/W, although some high-end ones rate higher. Comparatively, a typical incandescent light with15 lm/W efficacy is about 2% efficient -- 98% of its electrical power input becomes heat. An LED or CFL lamp, with 100lm/W, is about 14% efficient and 86% of its electrical power input converts to heat.
Typically 98% of an incandescent lamp’s electrical power input converts into radiant heat and therefore designers discount heat removal; an LED emitting at 555 nm with 70lm/W, converts almost 90% into conductive heat, which must be removed for optimal lamp performance.
If lighting engineers create a white light source where the electrical power input is uniformly distributed over all visible spectrum wavelengths, they would achieve the maximum theoretical efficacy of 200lm/W. The result is a white light source with perfect color rendering index (CRI).
Posted By: cloudy_thoughtsJust curious, but does anyone know what the figures would be for gaslight?
I'm hoping someone could prove that, after taking account of the power station efficiency, etc, it would be more efficient to light our homes with gaslight, then the common tungsten bulb.
Posted By: cloudy_thoughtsJust curious, but does anyone know what the figures would be for gaslight?
Posted By: billtit's not competitive even with normal tungsten lights.
Posted By: fostertomAs CFLs work by exciting various metallic gasses incl. mercury to bathe us in their characteristic complex wave pattern, that's equivalent to taking e.g. mercury, certainly as a homeopathic remedy of uncontrolled potency, which may or not beneficiial or harmful; maybe also or alternatively mercury as the gross poison that it is.
Posted By: Paul in Montrealsunlight also contains the same characteristic mercury "complex wave patterns". Is this why sunlight causes skin cancerHi Paul - shall we re-run this one?!
Posted By: fostertomIn homeopathy, a fundamental principle, amply proved empirically, is that 'potency' increases exponentially with successive dilution of the remedy, during preparation. Successive order-of-magnitude dilutions quickly result in a little soluble pill which in probability contains not a single molecule of the original active ingredient - and the higher that probability, the greater the potency of the preparation, in line with the well-proved medical effect of the original ingredient
Posted By: cloudy_thoughtswhat you say goes against common observation. As you reduce the concentration of something the less the body feels itThat's true, within the observable range. It's when things get tiny that it gets interesting.
Posted By: cloudy_thoughtsOnce you divide something down to nothingIt's not nothing, it's the trace or record of it, in the medium (i.e. water, thanks to its bizzare and unique properties), that carries the 'signal'.
Posted By: cloudy_thoughtswhy 'nothing' is always good and never badWho said that?
Posted By: fostertomThe fact that homeopathic medicine has worked for the last 300yrs,
Posted By: marktime which in probability contains not a single molecule of the original active ingredient - and the higher that probability, the greater the potency
Posted By: James NortonDoesn't that mean that everything that isn't an homeopathic preparation is effectively an infinitely effective homeopathic remedy?
Posted By: RobinBLightbulbs ! Would it make sense if all lightbulbs were labelled with lumens rather than watts?
Posted By: RobinBLightbulbs ! Would it make sense if all lightbulbs were labelled with lumens rather than watts?