Home  5  Books  5  GBEzine  5  News  5  HelpDesk  5  Register  5  GreenBuilding.co.uk
Not signed in (Sign In)

Categories



Green Building Bible, Fourth Edition
Green Building Bible, fourth edition (both books)
These two books are the perfect starting place to help you get to grips with one of the most vitally important aspects of our society - our homes and living environment.

PLEASE NOTE: A download link for Volume 1 will be sent to you by email and Volume 2 will be sent to you by post as a book.

Buy individually or both books together. Delivery is free!


powered by Surfing Waves




Vanilla 1.0.3 is a product of Lussumo. More Information: Documentation, Community Support.

Welcome to new Forum Visitors
Join the forum now and benefit from discussions with thousands of other green building fans and discounts on Green Building Press publications: Apply now.




    • CommentAuthorowlman
    • CommentTimeMay 24th 2016
     
    If you look at the recent elections in Austria, and the demographic of votes cast, it's the working class who supported the right wing candidate, I can only assume its because it's their jobs that will be in the firing line with an influx of cheap labour. Presumably the white collar workers who supported the winner have nothing to fear from migrant workers, at least in the short term.
    Funny old world ain't it; workers, and socialism, supporting the right wing.
  1.  
    Posted By: owlman
    Simon Still: Your link makes interesting reading and the references are worthy of note, aren't they all essentially the Chaos Theory. There's one missing though, it's the one about population growth, which in my book is the trigger for much of the rest


    Not really Chaos theory - that's the old 'a butterfly flips its wings in the rainforest and we get a storm'. I think it's the globalise modern world. It's only very recently that the Chinese harvest was of any concern to anyone outside China. Now it impacts worldwide. Climate Change is leading to more extreme weather - a greater number of droughts/floods/etc. Mass communication means that people in a deprived area have information - they can now see there is a different/better life being had elsewhere.

    Population Growth-

    Monbiot says its a red herring - it's about wealth/consumption, not population per se.
    Attenborough has spoken out on it - http://www.populationmatters.org/attenborough-talk/ he takes a different view.

    it's the one subject you really can't talk about. It seems evident to me theres a mismatch between resources and population but how you address it is, to put it mildly, controversial. The best TV I've seen that addressed it was Utopia - worth checking out if you missed it. http://www.imdb.com/title/tt2384811/
    •  
      CommentAuthordjh
    • CommentTimeMay 24th 2016
     
    Posted By: owlmanFunny old world ain't it; workers, and socialism, supporting the right wing.

    Twas ever thus, national socialism started in austria I think. The interesting thing to me about that election is the 'hollow middle'. Most votes for the candidates at the edges rather than the centre.
  2.  
    djh , yes the move away from liberalism,is slightly worrying to me.
    Why have the working class gone right, because they no longer feel they have representation from the traditional left.
    It seems to many in this group that there's lots of talk about cultural expression, rights and identity, unless of course you happen to be english and white, in which case any such sentiments are view as racist or bigotted.
    The closing down (and bracketing in this way) of expressions of reasonable concerns regarding immigration and illiberal attitudes of some migrant communities has given rise to the like of UKIP , EDL and BF and other right wing groups through out Europe, The general political establishment have only themselves to blame.
    • CommentAuthorgyrogear
    • CommentTimeMay 24th 2016
     
    when B. Liar is president of europe, all the inners will wish they'd listened to reason...

    gg
    •  
      CommentAuthorfostertom
    • CommentTimeMay 25th 2016
     
    Posted By: ringiName someone that has done more for public transport over the last few years then Boris.....
    Ken Livingstone.
    • CommentAuthorowlman
    • CommentTimeMay 25th 2016 edited
     
    Gyrogear: That wouldn't surprise me. He bought his ticket in by agreeing to a reduction in UK rebates, together with Andy Burnham, who was at the treasury.
    On the plus side he is from a country, who for virtually all of its membership, bar one year I think, has been a net contributor to the budget.
    •  
      CommentAuthorfostertom
    • CommentTimeMay 25th 2016
     
    I notice:

    The 'outs' focus on this month/this year issues i.e. whatever threats and dangers the media dishes up, spiced with factoids and selective statistics;
    The 'ins' have a broad, futuristic, more fluffy vision that's come from anywhere but the everyday media.

    The 'outs' swallow the media's/politicians' day-by-day barrage, the adversarial ding-dong, even while claiming to be cynical about them all;
    The 'ins' read books, dig a bit for unfiltered facts, spot trends, maybe notice what today's youth is up to, and trust that these are greater than the antics that surround them.

    Fundamentally, the flavours of each are a difference between fear of deterioration, scarcity, hence protection and exclusion;
    and some kind of 'it's all a learning' type of trust in a progressive humanity, hence generosity as the pragmatic way to get the best of everybody.

    In the end, both sides are equally trapped in a system that keep us fighting each other over perceived differences, which evaporate at every opportunity of actual human meeting. The biggest question is - why do we continually fall for this? why are we so cheaply bought?
    • CommentAuthorowlman
    • CommentTimeMay 25th 2016 edited
     
    bot de paille
    3 days ago edited
    quote
    Its all a puppet show designed to distract

    The real people in power don't care either way,they still own all the banks and mass media

    How did Blair and Obama work out for you? Hollande and Sarkozy? they all work for the same masters.


    There's your answer.


    Fostertom................ and some kind of 'it's all a learning' type of trust in a progressive humanity, hence generosity as the pragmatic way to get the best of everybody.

    Or more likely buying their allegiance.
    •  
      CommentAuthordjh
    • CommentTimeMay 25th 2016
     
    What are you smoking, Tom? Where can I get some?
    • CommentAuthorHollyBush
    • CommentTimeMay 25th 2016
     
    Can anyone here help me understand how Brexit affects green building?

    I remember discussions early in the EEC days about brick sizes, which made them smaller and easier to handle - was that a good thing?

    We haven't been required to alter our electric plugs, although I think 230 Volts is now standard (or is it 220 - 240?)

    must be others?

    Is there something people think we would have done differently if not in EU? What?
    • CommentAuthorskyewright
    • CommentTimeMay 25th 2016
     
    Posted By: HollyBush
    although I think 230 Volts is now standard (or is it 220 - 240?)

    Domestic voltage harmonisation was a triumphant example of achieving EU wide 'harmony' by doing, err, nothing...

    EU wide we are all nominally on 230V, but the tolerance (±10%) was set so that the existing arrangements across member states already complied, so no changes required.
    •  
      CommentAuthorfostertom
    • CommentTimeMay 25th 2016
     
    Posted By: owlmanOr more likely buying their allegiance
    QED

    Posted By: djhWhat are you smoking, Tom? Where can I get some?
    Just breathe in.
    • CommentAuthorEd Davies
    • CommentTimeMay 25th 2016
     
    Posted By: gyrogear: “when B. Liar is president of europe, all the inners will wish they'd listened to reason...”

    I think Blair has about as much chance of being president of Europe as he has of going to prison for crimes against peace (which I think is, regrettably, small [¹]).

    More importantly, the convoluted organization, which wasn't created specifically to baffle Borpin but more to distribute power around on the German Federal model (the Germans having some historical reason for concern about one nutter taking charge), means that there's not much risk that any one person, even Blair, can do much harm by, for example, invading anywhere.

    [¹] https://edavies.me.uk/2015/10/war-crime/
    •  
      CommentAuthordjh
    • CommentTimeMay 25th 2016
     
    Posted By: fostertomJust breathe in.

    :bigsmile: :bigsmile: :bigsmile:
    • CommentAuthorEd Davies
    • CommentTimeMay 25th 2016
     
    Posted By: skyewrightDomestic voltage harmonisation was a triumphant example of achieving EU wide 'harmony' by doing, err, nothing...

    EU wide we are all nominally on 230V, but the tolerance (±10%) was set so that the existing arrangements across member states already complied, so no changes required.
    It didn't change the supplied voltages (much) but what it did do was set a standard to which appliances sold throughout the market had to comply (i.e, operating off 207 to 253 volts). Manufacturers couldn't any longer say they only work with UK voltages (240±6% till 1994 so 225.6 to 254.4 V), for example.
    • CommentAuthorEd Davies
    • CommentTimeMay 25th 2016
     
    I'm with FT up to a point - almost all the arguments either way are proxies for more fundamental attitudes. I suspect he's right that there's a basic progressive/reactionary split of sorts. But there are other levels it works on. Mark Brinkley points [¹] to one:

    “The Brexit vote is asking us whether we feel primarily British or European; for me, a terrible choice as I feel I am both.”

    Doesn't quite explain, though, why even if you felt primarily British and only a little bit European you'd vote leave. It's more like whether you see it as them and us (Europeans and British) or us and more of us.

    [¹] http://markbrinkley.blogspot.co.uk/2016/05/on-brexit.html
    •  
      CommentAuthorSteamyTea
    • CommentTimeMay 25th 2016 edited
     
    Odd you should say that Ed (about being European). When I lived in the USA, I because a British European. Some of the people I worked with found it strange that I could jump in my car, get a ferry, go into France, Belgium, The Netherlands, German or Spain without having to spend hours going though immigration/customs. I pointed out that it was because of the EU that I could do that.
    In 20 years we (The British), have gone backwards on that part of being European. I remember one cycling trip to France (about 400 of us) where one of our team forgot his passport (he was Scottish, not that it makes any difference). We knew that there would be no checks getting into France, so he decided to risk it on the return journey. I think 400 sweaty cyclists put the passport control people off and they waved us though. On a previous trip (1986), I was in the car and had about 50 peoples duty frees cramped in the Chevette. I told the customs man that I had everyone's duty frees and he just waved me though. A sensible decision as he knew to redistribute it to the owners would take an hour.
    Now they would take the car, crush it with the fags and booze in it.
    • CommentAuthorMike1
    • CommentTimeMay 26th 2016 edited
     
    Posted By: HollyBushCan anyone here help me understand how Brexit affects green building?

    Four building-related areas are:

    - The biggest green concern is probably that Brexit would allow the UK Government to roll back energy efficiency measures set out in the 2010 Energy Performance of Buildings Directive and the 2012 Energy Efficiency Directive under the guise of cost-cutting/ binning red tape, so adversely affecting efforts to cut greenhouse gasses, increasing the need for new power stations, etc.
    https://ec.europa.eu/energy/en/topics/energy-efficiency/buildings
    http://www.keithtaylormep.org.uk/2016/05/18/leaving-eu-would-hurt-energy-efficiency-says-green-mep/#sthash.ElOPE5XM.dpuf

    - For many years, the EU nations have been harmonizing standards for products, including for construction products, making it easier to specify products manufactured in other EU countries. (Except, it seems to me, for water-supply related fittings, where WRAS seem to double up on standards in the UK - not sure how they get away with that.) Anyway, I guess that there is a risk that harmonization may slow/stop/start to diverge again outside the EU framework. More:
    http://www.umweltbundesamt.de/en/topics/economics-consumption/products/building-products/eu-law-for-construction-products

    - There seems to be a general view that if we leave the EU, there will be a serious shortage of construction workers, endangering the ability to build new homes in the quantities expected/needed, and pushing up the price of labour. Perhaps good for workers, but bad for the funding of your ecohome. On the other hand it might be another nail in the coffin of Hinkley Point.
    http://www.cityam.com/241337/eu-referendum-brexit-risks-compromising-plans-to-build-hundreds-of-thousands-of-new-homes

    - If, as expected, the pound falls, inflation (and the cost of building materials) rises, and inward investment slows, obtaining construction finance and mortgages could be more difficult and more expensive
    • CommentAuthorgyrogear
    • CommentTimeMay 26th 2016
     
    Posted By: Ed Daviesall the arguments either way are proxies for more fundamental attitudes


    +1

    the said fundamental attitudes being two in number:

    - stay in and opt to be part of the New World Order
    - exit and make a stand for cultural identity and basic human individualism

    gg
    •  
      CommentAuthorSteamyTea
    • CommentTimeMay 26th 2016
     
    Is that the first reference to the ' New World Order' on here.

    I am all for cultural identity, it will be good when all the Celts wear tartan, all the English wear bowler hats, the French a string of onions, Germans leather shorts (or is that the Austrians), the Dutch clogs, Spaniards look like bull fighters, the Portuguese will wear, well I have no idea, but the Italians will have posh suits, and I suppose all those old Soviet countries will be back in black and white. And, as they are not part of the EU, the Swiss will still be dripping in money. :wink:
    •  
      CommentAuthorfostertom
    • CommentTimeMay 26th 2016 edited
     
    Posted By: gyrogear- stay in and opt to be part of the New World Order
    - exit and make a stand for cultural identity and basic human individualism
    Subsidiarity is embodied in the EU.
    Devolution is the necessary route to globalisation.
    Globalisation (call it Global Village) is rightly here to stay - but doesn't/needn't mean anything like unfettered corporate asset-stripping.
    Nationalism is the very last, outdated, failed thing to put faith and trust in.
    •  
      CommentAuthordjh
    • CommentTimeMay 26th 2016
     
    Posted By: fostertomGlobalisation (call it Global Village)

    The meaning of Globalisation is almost diametrically opposite to that of Global Village to my mind.
    Even leaving out any trucking companies.
    •  
      CommentAuthordjh
    • CommentTimeMay 26th 2016
     
    Posted By: Mike1There seems to be a general view that if we leave the EU, there will be a serious shortage of construction workers

    But that's obviously a misplaced concern since if we leave we can choose to admit as many construction workers as we want from wherever we want and what's more, we can impose whatever visa terms or economic rules we want.
    •  
      CommentAuthordjh
    • CommentTimeMay 26th 2016
     
    Posted By: Mike1The biggest green concern is probably that Brexit would allow the UK Government to roll back energy efficiency measures set out in the 2010 Energy Performance of Buildings Directive and the 2012 Energy Efficiency Directive

    This is true but the underlying climate agreements are international, not EU law, so they would have to find some other way to reduce emissions. Brexit would also allow us to keep our low VAT rate on insulation products, which the EU is forcing us to increase.

    In other words, these points are all noise and more fundamental issues should be guiding peoples' intentions.
  3.  
    The referendum is about whether we want to be subservient to our EU masters - anything else is really neither here nor there and is smokescreen to this fact. Some folk get that, some folk don't. A lot of folk can be very cheaply bought with a bit of FUD.
    • CommentAuthorEd Davies
    • CommentTimeMay 26th 2016
     
    Posted By: gyrogearexit and make a stand for cultural identity and basic human individualism
    What about those who think cultural identity and basic human individualism are directly opposed? Just because somebody's born in a particular area there's no reason for them to be forced to either conform to the local culture there (as Steamy so neatly mocks) or remain in that place.
    • CommentAuthorEd Davies
    • CommentTimeMay 26th 2016 edited
     
    Posted By: willie.macleodThe referendum is about whether we want to be subservient to our EU masters
    We're all “subservient” to “masters” (representatives of other people, at least worst [¹]) to some degree or other. It's just a question of the geographical extent.

    “The referendum is about whether we, the people of Harris, want to be subservient to our Lewis and Harris masters.”

    [¹] As in democracy is the worst form of government except for all the others.
    •  
      CommentAuthorfostertom
    • CommentTimeMay 26th 2016 edited
     
    Posted By: djhThe meaning of Globalisation is almost diametrically opposite to that of Global Village to my mind
    OK, not Globalisation as it has all those connotations. I've been saying Global Brain (to which today's young are already 'native') which is the main thing, but there's also the ever-growing global network of physical infrastructure, interconnectedness generally. Don't know where Global Village came from - a bit 70's innit?

    Anyway, Europe is part of it, once fully realised in Subsidiarity and Devolution. UK (the dismal English Empire) definitely isn't. Celtic Devolution is, English regions to follow, all within EU. Just like Belgium.
  4.  
    I think the real problem with the referendum is that the quality of the cases made by both sides has been terrible. Both have been pretty much pure FUD with very little substantiated fact.

    I think i've got a full BINGO on the Logical Fallacies bingo card - https://yourlogicalfallacyis.com/

    This thread is exactly the same - people posting up emotional statements like "subservient to our EU masters", or "be part of the New World Order" which are exactly the sort of FUD they criticise from the other side.

    The exception is Tom who's definitely been smoking again. I've read his posts twice and I'm no clearer as to what he means.
   
The Ecobuilding Buzz
Site Map    |   Home    |   View Cart    |   Pressroom   |   Business   |   Links   
Logout    

© Green Building Press