Green Building Bible, Fourth Edition |
![]() |
These two books are the perfect starting place to help you get to grips with one of the most vitally important aspects of our society - our homes and living environment. PLEASE NOTE: A download link for Volume 1 will be sent to you by email and Volume 2 will be sent to you by post as a book. |
Vanilla 1.0.3 is a product of Lussumo. More Information: Documentation, Community Support.
Posted By: johnnyhI have ordered a tech 431 'steering' to control the CH mixer valve and in the meantime i have adjusted it right down which gives us a fairly low temp on the rads, not hot enough for a cold day. If i adjust the mixing valve back up, the tank destratifies.A 4 port mixer valve can help to minimise destratification by maximising the return temperature to the tank, but it may require you to use different take offs.
Posted By: johnnyhOne solution i think would be some ufh circuits to cool the radiator return temperature but they would have to be fed from the radiator return to have this effect.It depends. The flow rates, flow temperatures and thermal time constants are very different for radiators and UFH. If you're looking to dump huge amounts of heat into a building that is unlikely to over-heat then it will work. If you're looking for precise control of room temperatures in a well insulated building then it doesn't sound like the right way forward.
The question is simply: Will this work?
Posted By: johnnyhThe thing is the rads are already installed as i have changed over from an oil fired system. I am going to add one or two more rads where i have space but the upstairs floors are not finished yet and i've seen these aluminium reflectors that can be installed across the joists to allow UFH. I was hoping i could then get more low level heat, at least upstairs, and help keep the tank stratified on colder days when i need to turn the flow up a bit, which at the moment destroys the statifiction.
It's seems like a win-win situation as long as there are no reasons why the CH return cannot be used as UFH flow. Please feel free to correct or enlighten me!
Posted By: johnnyhI am also going to have a proper look at your manifold Peter although i don't quite understand how it works exactly.
Posted By: johnnyhi'm not really getting more than a day's worth of heating per charge and i had hoped for maybe two days when the weather is mild
Posted By: johnnyhIt's an old stone building with no south-facing windows, (but no north-facing either) and high ceilings. It's not an easy task to heat this place.
Posted By: johnnyhHi Davidfreeborough, i've got a 3 way mixing valve installed which works ok as long as i keep it very much closed, i.e. quite low rad temps, and i've now ordered a motorisation and thermomatic control system (the tech 431) so would a 4 way mixer be better?It depends upon the flow rates & how the system is connected. If you have the radiators with TRVs connected in parallel with multiple zone UFH then it can help to maintain a more constant flow rate from the thermal store. As the TRVs close then more of the flow will go via the 4 port valve's "bypass" route back to the thermal store. The return from the UFH is mixed with this "bypass" bringing it closer to the thermal store flow temperature. However, you need to position the take-offs, manifolds, etc to make sure this higher flow rate doesn't cause destratification. A 3 port mixing valve doesn't lift the UFH return temperature up towards the thermal store flow temperature, but it minimises the flow from the thermal store which will help to reduce destratification. Which approach is best will depend upon the thermal store, the take-offs chosen, the flow rates, the flow temperatures, the manifold arrangement, etc.
Posted By: johnnyhif the the idea of the batch burning/laddomat/thermal store combo was to burn hot and fast to get every last bit of energy then the pump should be switched on and off to achieve this and the fan should run all the time unless there is nowhere left for the heat to go (store full) or there is a problem and the boiler needs to shut down. This doesn't seem very complicated to me but it is too complicated for the ekoster. Maybe it's just a question of pump switching hysteresis.
Posted By: johnnyhEvery time the fan stops i assume there are combustible gases escaping through the chimney without igniting. I know the laddomat is there to protect the boiler against undertemperature but it also inadvertently controls it's maximum temp as well so it is the most efficient way to control the temp. of the boiler, i.e. keep it in the 85-90 degree zone.
Thinking about it, perhaps the reason my temperature swings so much if i set the 'pump on' to 86 or 87 is because the laddomat thermostat, i'm assuing it's a wax type thing, takes a minute or two to open and close. So when the boiler control turns the pump on there is a delay in which time the boiler hits 91 (fan stops) and then once the incoming cooler water has cooled the boiler a bit, there is another delay while the laddomat closes again and the temp drops to 79 and outside the 'zone'. Could i have a slow thermostat cartridge?
Posted By: johnnyhThe problem of destratification comes as soon a i take heat at any kind of rate which will hopefully be helped by my motorised mixer control.