Home  5  Books  5  GBEzine  5  News  5  HelpDesk  5  Register  5  GreenBuilding.co.uk
Not signed in (Sign In)

Categories



Green Building Bible, Fourth Edition
Green Building Bible, fourth edition (both books)
These two books are the perfect starting place to help you get to grips with one of the most vitally important aspects of our society - our homes and living environment.

PLEASE NOTE: A download link for Volume 1 will be sent to you by email and Volume 2 will be sent to you by post as a book.

Buy individually or both books together. Delivery is free!


powered by Surfing Waves




Vanilla 1.0.3 is a product of Lussumo. More Information: Documentation, Community Support.

Welcome to new Forum Visitors
Join the forum now and benefit from discussions with thousands of other green building fans and discounts on Green Building Press publications: Apply now.




    • CommentAuthorGarethC
    • CommentTimeJul 16th 2015
     
    While I struggle to find a sound consultant that can provide the necessary analysis, I'm beginning to spec the heating system I'd like to install.

    Current requirements:

    1. Single outdoor unit (better cost/benefit than multiple units + easier to get permission, but louder and slightly lower COPs than two smaller units)

    2. SCOP of 4+ (to cut CO2 by 40%, and heating costs by 25%, vs. my high efficiency combi boiler). Ideally, I’d like an official SCOP of nearer 5, as I apply a 20% haircut to official figures, but I’d need an R32 system and suitable ones aren’t available yet. Maybe by the time planning comes through…

    3. Circa £2k for equipment (including ducting etc. if necessary)

    4. 10kW max output

    5. Heat distribution to three zones (had hoped that one central zone would suffice, with heat flowing to other rooms naturally, but don’t think it would work)

    Point 4 is taxing me. Which would be better, a single internal unit ducted to three zones or a multi split system with three internal units? I -think- the latter, as:

    1. Running the narrow pipework to each zone would be a lot easier than installing outward and return ducting between each zone and a single central unit, plus thermostats for each zone.
    2. The wall mounted units will mix the warm air in faster and better than air delivered through a duct.

    A single indoor unit is cheaper than three indoor units, but I think the hassle and cost of ducting, plus the less efficient air mixing, offsets the benefits.

    Would appreciate any thoughts on this issue, and any others please.
    •  
      CommentAuthordjh
    • CommentTimeJul 16th 2015
     
    Posted By: GarethCPoint 4 is taxing me. Which would be better, a single internal unit ducted to three zones or a multi split system with three internal units? I -think- the latter, as:

    1. Running the narrow pipework to each zone would be a lot easier than installing outward and return ducting between each zone and a single central unit, plus thermostats for each zone.
    2. The wall mounted units will mix the warm air in faster and better than air delivered through a duct.

    3. Piping will be a lot quieter than the volume of air you would need to push through ducting.
  1.  
    Posted By: GarethC1. Running the narrow pipework to each zone would be a lot easier than installing outward and return ducting between each zone and a single central unit, plus thermostats for each zone.


    In general, you duct the individual supplies, but not necessarily all the returns - so long as there is a path in the general zone to the return duct you're good to go - just have to make sure the return openings are large enough for the overall airflow. I suspect there isn't much experience of ducted systems in the UK, though. For your point 4, 10kW isn't huge (would be known as a "3 ton" system over here) and so is easily within the capabilities of a single unit. The fewer units, the fewer things to go wrong (IMHO).

    Your only challenge is running the ducts - over here, most places have basements / crawl spaces where the ducts can be run, or you can use "micro ducts" - though there can be noise issues with the latter if not designed properly.

    Paul in Montreal.
    • CommentAuthorowlman
    • CommentTimeJul 16th 2015
     
    I thought most of the Air to Air units here in the UK used copper microbore between the heat pump and the fan emitters in the rooms. At least the ones I'm looking at do, what is the talk of ducts, have I missed something?
  2.  
    Posted By: owlmanI thought most of the Air to Air units here in the UK used copper microbore between the heat pump and the fan emitters in the rooms. At least the ones I'm looking at do, what is the talk of ducts, have I missed something?


    Mini/multi "split" systems use copper to transfer refrigerant to the local heat exchangers. Single units have one indoor and one outdoor unit - the outdoor is the evaporator and the indoor is the condenser and then a fan blows over that and you distribute the heated air via ducts. If your units are reversible, then in A/C mode the outdoor one becomes the condenser and the indoor the evaporator. The compressor is always in the outdoor unit.

    Paul in Montreal.
    • CommentAuthorowlman
    • CommentTimeJul 16th 2015
     
    Isn't it a lot easier and more efficient to distribute the heat via insulated microbore and then simply put individual and reversible fan condensers at the end of each run. Ducting warm air seems much more tedious to me.
  3.  
    I'm currently designing a multi split system that will use individual ducting to supply each room and extract from kitchen and bathrooms.

    I figure that if designed correctly and the equipment is of decent enough quality than it should be quieter than having a condenser mounted in each room. they are a bit ugly and quite noisy too.

    The condenser will be installed in the false ceiling above the stair landing that accesses each room so that the ducting runs will probably be less than 2 meters each. The ducts drawing air out of the bathroom and kitchen will be a bit longer.

    In France you can buy the multi split as a kit that is p-assembled and charged with the refrigerant ready to go.

    GarethC, the following PDF has a layout diagram of the parts available in a typical system. Its in French but you should still find it useful and be able to get an idea from looking at the images.
    Ask if you want any further info.

    http://s2.lmcdn.fr/multimedia/791400011044/1597d6d557edd58/produits/mode-d-emploi-vmc-double-flux-moyen-rendement-equation-1.pdf
    • CommentAuthorGarethC
    • CommentTimeJul 17th 2015
     
    Many thanks all for your input and advice, -much- appreciated.

    We're effectively a flat, so no way of running ducting underneath the floorboards. Since we've got nice cornicing etc, high level ducting would be hard to do aesthetically well too. I'll continue to play with the options, including micro-ducting, and consider other points made further too.

    Turns out I've got plenty of time anyway. I contacted Daikin after my first post to ask when they would start providing R32 multi-splits, and the answer was April next year (he wasn't sure about ducted systems). If I'm hoping this thing will last for years, it makes sense to wait for that, as the extra 10%+ in SCOP performance is worthwhile (should be 4.7, vs. 4.3 for best current systems).

    Apparently the mono-splits have been selling well in Japan with, as far as I can tell, no major problems with the 'new' refrigerant. There doesn't seem to be any price premium for the equipment. That makes sense, as pretty much the only thing changing is the refrigerant. Install prices will be more though I think, as I don't think an R32 system can be fully DIY'd.

    In the meantime I'll make sure I record my current energy usage accurately, as one thing I'll be trying to do once I've done the install is estimate how near to official figures AAHPs get.

    As an aside, it strikes me that another advantage of AAHPs is that they can dehumidify, and one thing we discuss a lot on this forum is problems caused by high humidity. Now, I know they can't dehumidify without also cooling, but in their 'duhumidify' settings, can they somehow maximise the amount of dehumidifying -relative- to the amount of cooling they do?? Couldn't find info on that aspect.

    Also, the Daikin mono-split unit advertises that it can bring in fresh air. Didn't look into it closely, but I assume it needs an extra inlet duct from outside to do so. Anyway, struck me as a potentially useful feature in that you would be able to control the amount of ventilation (and heat the air as it is introduced).

    Sorry, bit of a ramble.
  4.  
    Ive been reading that r32 is flammable and produces hydrogen flouride, highly toxic. No thanks
    • CommentAuthorGarethC
    • CommentTimeJul 17th 2015
     
    Been reading about the flammability aspect, as someone alluded to this in a separate point.

    A point made in an article I read (which I now can't find) was that it is far less flammable than the natural gas which homes like mine use for heating and cooking and, in contrast especially to gas used for cooking, it's in a sealed system, so inherently less risky.

    It also suggested that even if all the R32 evacuated into a home, the volumes are low enough such that it's concentration would be too low to ignite (compared to a natural gas leak, where lots of the stuff could be released). And if there was ignition at the point of release from the system, where the R32 was concentrated, you would get a flame (obviously not great), but not an explosion.

    So the flammability aspect I think I'm comfortable with.

    The hydrogen fluoride I didn't know about! I will do some research on that, thanks for the heads up Mr Haystack!
    • CommentAuthorGarethC
    • CommentTimeJul 17th 2015 edited
     
    This is one of the documents I read (which includes looking at R32 multi-splits in a domestic environment). A bit hard work... But the Japanese should have the best results. They've been on sale in Japan for a few years now, and the Japanese are most concerned with safety as, due to the prevalence of earthquakes, leakages from systems such as this are a much greater risk than they would be in the UK.

    This does consider HF. Haven't had time to read any conclusions yet.

    http://www.jsrae.or.jp/committee/binensei/2013PR_e_ab.pdf
    •  
      CommentAuthordjh
    • CommentTimeJul 17th 2015
     
    This seems to be a reasonable summary although with an obvious positive spin
    http://racca.asn.au/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/R32-Common-Questions-Sept-2014.pdf
  5.  
    I think there is research that suggests and which is ignored in the "industry spin" research, that there is a possible issue when r32 is mixed with the hvac lubrication system oil.
    •  
      CommentAuthordjh
    • CommentTimeJul 17th 2015
     
    Posted By: bot de pailleI think there is research that suggests and which is ignored in the "industry spin" research, that there is a possible issue when r32 is mixed with the hvac lubrication system oil.

    A reference would be helpful?
    • CommentAuthorGarethC
    • CommentTimeJun 15th 2016 edited
     
    Whoops. Forgot links.

    R32 has finally made it's way to non-premium A2A in the UK. Another step along the long road towards me actually installing something (although impending self imposed unemployment may mean yet another delay).

    I'm looking at FTXM-M units. See top of page 17 of this: http://tinyurl.com/h7mrtja for spec, and compare to the middle of page 18 to compare with equivalent R-410A units (FTXS-K). Essentially, R32 offers about a 6% improvement in SCOP performance, which is not to be sniffed at. The ones I'm looking at have claimed SCOPs of 5.1 (vs. 4.8 for R-410A equivalents), giving me more confidence of reaching my target of at least 4.0.

    I'm looking at three of the smallest units rated 2.5kW for heating (max 4kW) and a couple rated 4kW (max 5.2) for a larger rooms. Individually they're pretty good value. The former are about £600 each including the outside unit here http://www.daikinonline.co.uk/daikin-ftxm-rxm-inverter-r32.html.

    But of course I can't really have five outside units, so intend to have two multi-splits, one with three emitters and one with two. All in the kit comes to £3k. I hope I'll get a discount on that, but will still have to buy pipes and other gubbins, so the total will probably be about that. Not too bad though.

    I think one will serve the lounge and children's bedroom, and the other will do the kitchen, our bedroom and the spare bedroom. My reasoning is that heat pumps perform better when not maxed out. If I had one which did lounge and kitchen, which are warmer rooms used at similar times, and another which did the bedrooms, to an extent there would be more times when one was working flat out, less efficiently, and the other idle.

    Does that make sense?

    In fact, does anyone know the methodology used to measure multi-split performance? I can't find details on the inter-web. Generally, the stated SCOPs for multi-splits are lower than for otherwise equivalent individual split units, but I don't fully understand why. I suspect the multi-split performance will vary greatly depending upon how it's used, and I'd like to get close to what single splits to achieve.
  6.  
    I hadn't realised how high the GWP of heat pump working fluids is. The GWP of my A2W heat pump is equivalent to the carbon emissions of several years worth of energy usage.I'll need to make sure it doesn't leak.

    The R32 fluid seems to be an improvement on GWP as well as CoP, combined with recent decreases in Uk grid intensity it will be lower carbon than mains gas or electric heating.
    • CommentAuthormike7
    • CommentTimeJun 19th 2016 edited
     
    The GWP of R32 is 675, less than half that of the R410a in my heatpumps, so a big improvement, but I think it's a pity they didn't have the courage to approve propane (R290) , especially for smaller installations, as its GWP is only 3.3
    • CommentAuthorGarethC
    • CommentTimeJun 19th 2016
     
    And I think you need less of the R32, so an additional benefit. Apparently it's quite an issue, because while it's not hard to avoid loss/leakage, an unscrupulous installer, or more likely remover, can just vent the refrigerant to the air out of laziness.

    Is propane as effective? Shame it's not allowed if it is, as surely no more dangerous than having a natural gas feed to your house?
Add your comments

    Username Password
  • Format comments as
 
   
The Ecobuilding Buzz
Site Map    |   Home    |   View Cart    |   Pressroom   |   Business   |   Links   
Logout    

© Green Building Press