Home  5  Books  5  GBEzine  5  News  5  HelpDesk  5  Register  5  GreenBuilding.co.uk
Not signed in (Sign In)

Categories



Green Building Bible, Fourth Edition
Green Building Bible, fourth edition (both books)
These two books are the perfect starting place to help you get to grips with one of the most vitally important aspects of our society - our homes and living environment.

PLEASE NOTE: A download link for Volume 1 will be sent to you by email and Volume 2 will be sent to you by post as a book.

Buy individually or both books together. Delivery is free!


powered by Surfing Waves




Vanilla 1.0.3 is a product of Lussumo. More Information: Documentation, Community Support.

Welcome to new Forum Visitors
Join the forum now and benefit from discussions with thousands of other green building fans and discounts on Green Building Press publications: Apply now.




  1.  
    Hello

    I am thinking of incorporating a passive house detail for MVHR extract using a transfer gap behind the architrave at the head of the door. Will this work for fire regs with an expanding fire seal, or will intumescent seals hamper the ventilation required? Has anyone any experience?
    • CommentAuthorGaryB
    • CommentTimeJul 5th 2012
     
    Jenny
    Transfer gaps work fine and the intumescent strips aren't a problem as they don't seal until high temperatures are experienced.
    It is surprising just how much ventilation can pass through the gaps around a door. A standard door can pass 70 litres/sec at a pressure differential of 15 Pa.
    • CommentAuthortony
    • CommentTimeJul 5th 2012
     
    Sounds like a bad idea to me, is it for ventilation or draughts?
  2.  
    Posted By: tonySounds like a bad idea to me, is it for ventilation or draughts?
    I think he's talking about internal doors & maintaining MVHR driven circulation when they are closed.

    David
    • CommentAuthortony
    • CommentTimeJul 6th 2012
     
    I leave a gap at the bottom of the door for that!
    • CommentAuthorEd Davies
    • CommentTimeJul 6th 2012
     
    Posted By: GaryBA standard door can pass 70 litres/sec at a pressure differential of 15 Pa.

    Interesting and worth knowing but note that 15 Pa is a lot. 2 m × 0.75 m × 15 Pa = 22.5 N which means the force needed on the handle when opening or closing the door would be about the weight of a 1 kg thing¹. That'd be very noticeable. Also, those conditions would dissipate a fraction over 1 W, probably mostly as noise - energy which would have to come from the fans.

    How does flow rate scale with pressure difference - I've a feeling it's either with the square or the square root but can't work out which?

    ¹ The door's a lever, the other half of the pressure being taken by the hinges.
    • CommentAuthorGaryB
    • CommentTimeJul 6th 2012
     
    Pressure drop is proportional to the square of the flow, so for half the pressure drop (7.5 Pa) the leakage would be 49.5 litres/sec.
    Operating theatres and clean rooms are designed to 25-30 Pa to keep bacteria and dust out, so 15 Pa is not a lot of pressure, but pressurised ventilation would be rare in a domestic setting. Pressurised fire escape corridors and stairs go as high as 50 Pa. Above 50 Pa it becomes difficult to open the doors!
    •  
      CommentAuthordjh
    • CommentTimeJul 7th 2012
     
    Posted By: tonyI leave a gap at the bottom of the door for that!

    But then it wouldn't be a fire door, which is the point of the intumescent seal?
    • CommentAuthortony
    • CommentTimeJul 7th 2012
     
    I have never been "pulled" by a BI or fire officer about gaps under doors, have gaps under doors in my house or the MHRV wouldn't work.
    • CommentAuthorEd Davies
    • CommentTimeJul 8th 2012
     
    When a blower-door test is done, are internal doors left open or closed? Open I'd guess. Would the efficiency of the MHRV be assessed with doors open or closed? Closed I'd guess.
    • CommentAuthorJoiner
    • CommentTimeJul 8th 2012
     
    David's right, whether or not anyone's been "pulled" by BC or a fire officer, a fire door with a gap along its bottom is pointless.

    Once the intumescent strip has sealed the three edges and effectively sealed the room, then smoke will rapidly build up and in very short order find its way under the door.

    If that's the situation created by a MVHR system then it's lunacy.

    If each room can't be treated on an individual basis by the MVHR then it shouldn't be fitted if it means compromising the integrity of a fire door.

    (I can't get hold of my fire officer son at the moment, but as soon as I do I'll ask him what he'd do if he saw a situation like the one being recommended here.)
    • CommentAuthorGaryB
    • CommentTimeJul 8th 2012
     
    If the door is fire rated then it should have intumescent strips rebated into the bottom of the door as well.

    An MVHR slightly pressurises the habitable rooms which could help keep smoke out.
    • CommentAuthorJoiner
    • CommentTimeJul 8th 2012
     
    For the benefit of people coming along later, it's wise to include details like that in any post that suggests cutting off the bottom of a fire door, Gary. :wink:
    • CommentAuthorGaryB
    • CommentTimeJul 8th 2012 edited
     
    Joiner:

    It was Tony suggested undercutting the doors, not me!

    I was pointing out the level of leakage possible through internal doors even those which appear to be a tight fit.

    It is also my understanding that fire rated doors are rebated and fitted with intumescent strips on the bottom regardless of whether undercut or not.
    • CommentAuthortony
    • CommentTimeJul 8th 2012
     
    not all fire doors have or need strips or smoke seals.
    • CommentAuthorJoiner
    • CommentTimeJul 8th 2012
     
    Gary, wasn't having a go at you mate, I was actually confirming what you said because it was a point I hadn't made. :bigsmile:

    HOWEVER :shamed:

    Just spoken to fire officer son (fresh in the pub after a morning's diving) and he says no formal checks are done now by fire officers unless there is a statutory requirement, in a residential home or hotel, or such like, so apologies to Tony. He did say that any gap under a fire door has to be "a sensible one of about 6mm" because it's assumed that smoke will probably not drop to that level within the room in which the fire is happening. He'll check with the enforcement officer tomorrow and get back to me if there is such a thing as a recommended maximum gap.

    I wonder why no one makes anything like this to be 'triggered' by heat in the way of intumescent strip?

    http://www.norsound.co.uk/Door-Bottom-Seals/
    •  
      CommentAuthordjh
    • CommentTimeJul 9th 2012
     
    Personally, ventilation gaps under doors lead me to two other questions as well:

    (1) don't they increase noise transmission?

    (2) they would allow small animals (I'm think of mice that the cat has brought in) to escape underneath, which is not usually desirable.

    So I'm interested in any alternatives.
    • CommentAuthorJoiner
    • CommentTimeJul 10th 2012 edited
     
    Do find the whole subject fascinating because leaving (or creating in this case) a gap under a fire door is counter-intuitive. It's just something I've never done and I've fitted scores of the things, taking pride in getting the door just skimming whatever floor covering is there.

    Just texted my son and he says he's hoping to hear back from his enforcement officer colleague later today about whether there's a recommended max gap allowable as far as the fire service is concerned.

    He did say in that earlier conversation that if he ever saw a gap under a door that he thought "a bit wide" he'd advise against it "for safety's sake", but that at the end of the day, as far as any prescriptive regulations went, it was down to the householder concerned to worry about the safety of his or her family.

    I'd personally be concerned for the simple reason that if you're cutting a slice off the bottom of a door to allow an easier movement of air between rooms, then it surely goes without saying that if that air contains combustion smoke it's going to be shifting that around as well, courtesy of the MV air changes.

    What am I missing here?
    • CommentAuthorRobinB
    • CommentTimeJul 10th 2012
     
    Posted By: GaryBIf the door is fire rated then it should have intumescent strips rebated into the bottom of the door as well.


    It makes sense but I've never seen it or been asked for it in a domestic setting.

    But how else do could we fit MVHR in a house which requires internal fire doors -I suspect the relatively small air-flow just pass through the small gaps that the intumescent strips would fill in the event of fire.

    Our fire doors are generally only ever closed at night.
    • CommentAuthorEd Davies
    • CommentTimeJul 10th 2012
     
    If you have intumescent strips there is there any risk of them jamming the door just when you need to open it most? Conversely, would strips so low down actually get any heat to make them work early enough to prevent the spread of smoke?
    • CommentAuthorJoiner
    • CommentTimeJul 10th 2012 edited
     
    My son got back to me, having heard from his enforcement officer colleague, and he said it was "all very subjective", so more or less what I said in the post with "HOWEVER" in it, with the exception that in newbuild he would expect to see a good, well-aligned fit with only the smallest of gaps beneath.

    Apparently, they're easy on refurbs of old houses because of the difficulty of finding a doorway in square and plumb.

    But his colleague knew nothing about the trend for MVHR and asked that I send him a link to the forum so that if there is "reason for concern" he can advise region and apprize them of the technology so that they can assess the trend for risks they should be aware of, if there is then they'll pass it on to national level and "something will have to be done" to get BC involved.

    Hmmm.

    I did mention intumescent strips, and even the heat-activated duct valves, but of course it isn't the heat that kills, necessarily, it's the SMOKE, and that doesn't trigger intumescent anything.

    I'm still a wee bit concerned for all the reasons I outlined in my previous post.
    • CommentAuthorTimSmall
    • CommentTimeJul 10th 2012
     
    Out of interest, I've recently done a project which used computer room waste heat to heat some office space. The appropriate bit of the building regs (commercial fire bit), stated that if the fire alarm was triggered, then any ventilation system would need to either shut-down entirely, or switch over to extract-only mode.

    I was thinking of tying my domestic MVHR system into the fire-alarm system to do something similar... In an MVHR system which I installed 8-or-so years ago, I stuck a heat-closing (70 degree C?) vent port in the kitchen - since the duct run then passed through a bedroom on it's way to the MVHR unit.
    • CommentAuthorJoiner
    • CommentTimeJul 16th 2012 edited
     
    Interesting detail in this helpful pdf...

    "General requirements for mechanical extract ventilation - Mechanical ventilation to rooms without openable windows to be linked to light operation and have 15 minutes overrun and a 10mm gap under the door for air supply." (p.41)

    http://www.fdean.gov.uk/media/Assets/Planning-BC/documents/approved%20documents/NEW_DWELLINGS_GUIDANCE_EDITION_5.pdf
Add your comments

    Username Password
  • Format comments as
 
   
The Ecobuilding Buzz
Site Map    |   Home    |   View Cart    |   Pressroom   |   Business   |   Links   
Logout    

© Green Building Press