Green Building Bible, Fourth Edition |
![]() |
These two books are the perfect starting place to help you get to grips with one of the most vitally important aspects of our society - our homes and living environment. PLEASE NOTE: A download link for Volume 1 will be sent to you by email and Volume 2 will be sent to you by post as a book. |
Vanilla 1.0.3 is a product of Lussumo. More Information: Documentation, Community Support.
Posted By: tonyhow do you define carbon emissions?I would define them as streams of carbon being added to the biosphere (atmosphere, plants and animals, top-soil, top few hundred metres of the oceans, etc).
belting out CO2 (and pollutants) from a chimney and calling it zero is not rightIndeed, it wouldn't be. Is there any indication that that's happening here? They say a reduction of 45% which seems plausible to me. Basically, you lose the roughly 60% wastage of a non-CHP plant (up the cooling towers) but use a smaller so probably slightly less efficient generator instead. Sounds roughly plausible to me.
and do the health costs get added into the cost side?I assume you mean the local health costs of emissions from the plant? With gas power (as used in Aberdeen) that shouldn't be too much of a problem, I'd have thought.
I like the idea of reduced cost but would prefer to see reduced energy use.I too like reduced cost. However, is see little benefit to reduced energy use as such - only reduction in the harmful effects of harvesting and transforming energy. Using a bit less energy but getting it from a more harmful source is not a win.
Any more info to allow an informed opinion to be expressed, Will?