Green Building Bible, Fourth Edition |
These two books are the perfect starting place to help you get to grips with one of the most vitally important aspects of our society - our homes and living environment. PLEASE NOTE: A download link for Volume 1 will be sent to you by email and Volume 2 will be sent to you by post as a book. |
Vanilla 1.0.3 is a product of Lussumo. More Information: Documentation, Community Support.
Posted By: CWattersIn my opinion it's all about control...
If your house isn't air tight you end up with some unknown and uncontrollable amount of ventilation and a matching heat loss.
If you build an air tight house you can/must control the ventilation by designing it in. You could specify adjustable trickle vents but with these you get limited control because ventilation depends on the wind. You also loose heat because air goes in some vents and out of others.
MVHR is much better. Not only because air goes in and out via a heat exchanger recovering the heat but you can control which rooms get incoming fresh air and which rooms have extract vents (at the design stage).
We opted for MVHR and was surprised to find we didn't need a separate extractor fan (or boost option on the MVHR) in the bathroom despite four of us using the shower. Your mileage may vary.
We did fit an extractor fan over the hob but it's not used a lot.
Posted By: bardoWe have gone for adjustable trickle vents in the windows despite the mentioned reasons. The calculated heat loss is around 3kW.
Posted By: Peter_in_HungaryPosted By: bardoWe have gone for adjustable trickle vents in the windows despite the mentioned reasons. The calculated heat loss is around 3kW.
3kW per what? hour? day? month? or a continuous 3kW loss?
Posted By: bardoThanks all. We have gone for adjustable trickle vents in the windows despite the mentioned reasons.
1 to 15 of 15