Home  5  Books  5  GBEzine  5  News  5  HelpDesk  5  Register  5  GreenBuilding.co.uk
Not signed in (Sign In)

Categories



Green Building Bible, Fourth Edition
Green Building Bible, fourth edition (both books)
These two books are the perfect starting place to help you get to grips with one of the most vitally important aspects of our society - our homes and living environment.

PLEASE NOTE: A download link for Volume 1 will be sent to you by email and Volume 2 will be sent to you by post as a book.

Buy individually or both books together. Delivery is free!


powered by Surfing Waves




Vanilla 1.0.3 is a product of Lussumo. More Information: Documentation, Community Support.

Welcome to new Forum Visitors
Join the forum now and benefit from discussions with thousands of other green building fans and discounts on Green Building Press publications: Apply now.




    • CommentAuthorSwarm
    • CommentTimeSep 5th 2016
     
    I'm thinking of adding more smoke alarms, to bedrooms, a cupboard with server in etc. Then I thought, what about adding one inside the extract plenum for my MVHR. Then if by some remote case of a fire starting in a bathroom, the smoke would quite quickly find it's way into the plenum and trigger the alarm.

    Which will then alarm the others and shut down power to the MVHR.
    • CommentAuthorbarney
    • CommentTimeSep 5th 2016
     
    The detector will b constantly flushed by the airflow - typically you n the d a sampling unit that takes a proportion of the and introduces that to the detector chamber to give a signal

    Barney
    • CommentAuthorCWatters
    • CommentTimeSep 5th 2016 edited
     
    Does it matter if the detector is "flushed"? Once it triggers won't it will keep sounding until manually reset so does it matter if the smoke is flushed out? or do I misunderstand?
    • CommentAuthorbarney
    • CommentTimeSep 5th 2016
     
    It's the dilution - you need enough obscuration to trigger the alarm in the first place

    With mechanical extract it's easy to cut through a hot smoke layer and draw clean air from below the smoke

    Barney
    • CommentAuthorSwarm
    • CommentTimeSep 6th 2016
     
    If I can get a smoke alarm inside, I might do some testing with it partially covered and at lower flow rates. I'll report back.
    • CommentAuthorbarney
    • CommentTimeSep 6th 2016
     
    I wouldnt make any kind of demand on it - what are you using for smoke

    Barney
    • CommentAuthorsnyggapa
    • CommentTimeSep 6th 2016
     
    you may also find that the forced airflow furrs or clags up the sensor with dust, making it ineffective over time.

    Personally, I wouldn't do it
    • CommentAuthorMike1
    • CommentTimeSep 8th 2016
     
    Not a crazy idea if you use the right kit - for example https://www.notifierfiresystems.co.uk/product.asp?id=695

    ...but only for use as an additional layer of protection, not instead of a regular installation.
    •  
      CommentAuthorSteamyTea
    • CommentTimeSep 11th 2016
     
    Don't some fire alarms also detect thermal energy as well as smoke, they would not work well in a ducts.
Add your comments

    Username Password
  • Format comments as
 
   
The Ecobuilding Buzz
Site Map    |   Home    |   View Cart    |   Pressroom   |   Business   |   Links   
Logout    

© Green Building Press