Home  5  Books  5  GBEzine  5  News  5  HelpDesk  5  Register  5  GreenBuilding.co.uk
Not signed in (Sign In)

Categories



Green Building Bible, Fourth Edition
Green Building Bible, fourth edition (both books)
These two books are the perfect starting place to help you get to grips with one of the most vitally important aspects of our society - our homes and living environment.

PLEASE NOTE: A download link for Volume 1 will be sent to you by email and Volume 2 will be sent to you by post as a book.

Buy individually or both books together. Delivery is free!


powered by Surfing Waves




Vanilla 1.0.3 is a product of Lussumo. More Information: Documentation, Community Support.

Welcome to new Forum Visitors
Join the forum now and benefit from discussions with thousands of other green building fans and discounts on Green Building Press publications: Apply now.




    • CommentAuthortomsusweb
    • CommentTimeSep 2nd 2007
     
    I just found this very interesting article:

    http://www.housebuildersupdate.co.uk/2007/07/little-known-history-of-vapour-barrier.html

    I'd be interested in forum members thoughts - especially as there still seems to be a lot of debate on this forum about breathing wall timber frame construction as described in the Whole House Book and advocated by Warmcel. (e.g. see here: http://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=532&page=2 )

    I'm about to embark on a self funded new build in Ireland. Building control and codes are a non-issue for me, so I'm contemplating something radical. A timber frame house with electric fan assisted passive stack ventilation to remove moisture laden air from all rooms. Wall construction (inside to out): sasmox boards on 6x2 studs with sheeps wool insulation, then 100mm tektalan e21 magnesite wood wool insulation boards and then a render of waterproof rein fibre cement on a mesh (rein fibres and mesh will prevent cracking).

    Conventional wisdom says this is madness.

    My logic suggests that it will be super insulated, the studs will be warm - hence no due point on them, and internal most moisture will be moved by the ventilation. Obviously I will need to carefully keep an eye on the rein fibre render, but unless water is pouring in from the outside, the timber is 100mm away and should be safe. The advantages of taking this route are simplicity, cost effectiveness and super insulation. The danger according to conventional wisdom is that the timber will rot. I don't think it will.

    More info on tektalan insulation boards is here:

    http://www.skanda-uk.com/heraklithProducts.htm

    More info on Rein fibre cement which I have used in a 7mm coat to create waterproof bird baths that haven't cracked in years:

    http://www.koicymru.co.uk/const9c.htm

    http://koicymru.co.uk/q&a7.htm

    I'm almost tempted to try the construction as an experiment. The thoughts of the forum are very welcome!

    (This is my first post - I've been a long time lurker - many thanks for all the insights on the forums.)
    • CommentAuthortony
    • CommentTimeSep 2nd 2007
     
    It is your money. Putting it where your beliefs are would be very unwise in my opinion.

    Let me tell you about lead pumping. This a rare syndrome where moisture condenses on the underside of lead box gutters from the air in the roof space. It leads to the client believing that their roof is leaking ( damp patches on the ceiling) when it is not. Just the lead got very cold and dew point was reached -- this can happen on summer evenings with a clear sky as well as in winter.

    Condensation will happen in your walls during cold weather no matter how much you try to control the moisture inside the house. When it does mould will result and worse. Moisture will tend to move from areas of higher partial vapour pressure to ones of lower, ie from the nice warm rooms out through the walls but dew point will sometimes be within the wall. Get out of that if you can? Even when it not in the wall do you want all that damp being drawn into the walls?
  1.  
    Just to add to tonys post, I do not like rendering over external insulation of any kind. I worry that large areas of thin dense material cannot expand and contract with seasonal temperature fluctuations without cracking, leading to moisture ingress, exacerbating the [already high?] risk of interstitial condensation.
    •  
      CommentAuthornigel
    • CommentTimeSep 3rd 2007
     
    Rendering over external insulation works fine if its done properly and with an appropriate reinforcement and adequate depth of lime based render.

    I have successfully used the Keim render system and St Astier Mono and with no cracking on a timber frame structure.

    I would add a combined vapour and air tightness barrier on the inside something like sisalkraft which will significantly improve air tightness.
    I would also suggest warmcell rather than sheeps wool as it forms a better air tightness barrier and has a higher decrement delay.
    • CommentAuthorJohan
    • CommentTimeSep 3rd 2007 edited
     
    Posted By: tomsuswebI just found this very interesting article:

    http://www.housebuildersupdate.co.uk/2007/07/little-known-history-of-vapour-barrier.html" rel="nofollow" >http://www.housebuildersupdate.co.uk/2007/07/little-known-history-of-vapour-barrier.html


    Got to love this part of the article:

    "Now, in the 1930s, placing insulation in walls was a relatively new idea and the businesses making insulation were keen to see that this new business venture wasn’t killed off by complaints from painters before it had got going. So they set out to investigate."

    Insulation a NEW idea in the 1930??!! My parents houes was built (timber frame) 1921, it has a vapour barrier (in the walls and roof) consisting of paper soaked in tar and is insulated with sawdust (roof) and wood shavings in the walls. Never been any issues with damp there...

    Fit a vapour barrier. If you don't want use polythene use tarred paper... :wink:

    Tom, how are you planning on insulating the floor and the roof?

    The Sasmox boards are very nice indeed, but very expensive...Fermacell is a little bit cheaper, but equally good.
  2.  
    Posted By: nigelRendering over external insulation works fine if its done properly and with an appropriate reinforcement and adequate depth of lime based render.


    Nigel, I would be interested to read more detail of the spec you would advocate? mix proportions, expansion joints etc?
    •  
      CommentAuthornigel
    • CommentTimeSep 3rd 2007
     
    Mike

    This is one of the products I have used. There is no need for expansion joints but when used with heraklith tektelan a glassfibre reinforcement mesh is required with an additional layer at the corners of an opening. Thickness of up to 15mm.

    http://www.lime-green.co.uk/images/Product/MONOSTASTIER.pdf
    • CommentAuthortomsusweb
    • CommentTimeSep 4th 2007
     
    Thanks for the comments everyone. So I take it that Nigel and Johan are suggesting the system I described would be OK as long as a vapour barrier was fitted and also I used the correct rendering process?

    I like the idea of Warmcel - would you recommend it sprayed in wet or pressure injected behind boards - our local guy doesn't like wet spraying.

    Floor is a suspended timber floor (house built on peers) so probably warmcel between the joists. Roof would be warmcel also.

    Thanks for the input - still not sure what way to do it - a more conventional approach with an air gap does sound safer but hard to get such good insualation. Any more thoughts are welcome!
    • CommentAuthorJohan
    • CommentTimeSep 4th 2007
     
    Posted By: tomsuswebThanks for the comments everyone. So I take it that Nigel and Johan are suggesting the system I described would be OK as long as a vapour barrier was fitted and also I used the correct rendering process?

    I like the idea of Warmcel - would you recommend it sprayed in wet or pressure injected behind boards - our local guy doesn't like wet spraying.

    Floor is a suspended timber floor (house built on peers) so probably warmcel between the joists. Roof would be warmcel also.

    Thanks for the input - still not sure what way to do it - a more conventional approach with an air gap does sound safer but hard to get such good insualation. Any more thoughts are welcome!
    I agree with Nigel. Warmcel or some other eco fiber is good for walls and roofs, not sure how it would work for a floor though. Pricewise it is also competative with glassfibre wool, which Thermafleece isn't...

    If you have a vapour barrier on the inside of the wall you can dry blow it before you fit the plaster boards.

    Personally I would recommend a service void between the vapour barrier and the internal plaster board, 1x2. Just makes life easier. :smile: You can always fill the service void with another 25mm of insulation if you want to,rule of thumb is you can have the vapour barrier up to 1/3 into the insulation. A dew point calculation is always recommended though to make sure...
  3.  
    I do love the idea of a house built on peers. The Lower House has been wondering what to do with them for years.
    •  
      CommentAuthornigel
    • CommentTimeSep 5th 2007
     
    You can blow the warmcell into the void between the sheathing and the external insulation.
    You would need a 100mm hole to be made in the sheathing for each void which is then replaced and taped up.

    The Vapour contrrol layer is then fiited after the insulation is installed.
    • CommentAuthortomsusweb
    • CommentTimeSep 11th 2007 edited
     
    Thanks again for the comments everyone. I've been talking to various people and doing some reading. My current plan is (inside to out):

    1. Clay plaster (for hygroscopic buffering - see Neil May's paper link below)
    2. Heraklith 50mm boards
    3. Sisalkraft 410 vapour barrier
    4. 6" Stud frame with warmcel
    '5. Heraklith 50mm boards
    6. Lime render with mesh as described by Nigel above.

    The only unconventional things here as I see it are no air gap between rain screen and frame and also lack of building regs racking strength for the Heraklith. The layers described are what are recommended in the Heraklith documentation - my only concern is that this is for Garmany / Austria - not as damp as Ireland! But we're in a very sheltered spot, so little driving rain, so I'm prepared to give it a go and take good care of the lime render unless lots of people suggest it's complete madness!

    I like the sound of the Heraklith internally as it can be chased for wiring etc and provides good decrement delay / thermal mass.

    I love the idea of clay plaster (done a bit before in NZ). See Neil May's paper linked form here:

    http://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=630&page=1#Item_1

    We think for the suspended timber floor we'll use 15mm bitroc attached under the joists and then fill with warmcel.

    'Room in the roof' roof construction will be (inside to out):

    1. Clay plaster
    2. Heraklith 25mm
    3. Sisalkraft 410
    4. 9" rafters with warmcel between
    5. 18mm Sarket boards
    6. Battens
    7. Slates

    Comments welcome!
    • CommentAuthortony
    • CommentTimeSep 11th 2007
     
    Can you please tell us what the U values will be?
    • CommentAuthortomsusweb
    • CommentTimeSep 11th 2007 edited
     
    Posted By: tonyCan you please tell us what the U values will be?


    sorry tony - no idea! don't trust u values as used in uk anyway. that's why i'm building in ireland with my own cash well away from building control etc. it's going to be a lot warmer than the current block council house!

    if anybody would like to do the sums it'd be appreciated. timber is white deal. clay plaster will be 20mm. the great thing about the clay plaster is the reduced need for air changes - which will save lots of energy (as i have no intention of using a heat recovery ventilation system).
  4.  
    How does plaster reduce the need for air changes? There's more to air changes than just removing humidity. Of course, if you don't build airtight in the first place, there's no need for mechanical ventilation.

    Paul in Montreal
    •  
      CommentAuthornigel
    • CommentTimeSep 11th 2007
     
    My rough calc says about 0.21 for the walls and the roof is less good at 0.23.

    It would be better to make the roof better at the expense of the walls.

    I know you dont need to satisfy them but the roof would not satisfy building regs in the uk whereas the walls are well below building regs requirements.
    • CommentAuthortomsusweb
    • CommentTimeSep 11th 2007 edited
     
    Posted By: Paul in MontrealHow does plaster reduce the need for air changes? There's more to air changes than just removing humidity.
    Paul in Montreal


    Some info here:

    http://www.housebuildersupdate.co.uk/2007/07/how-should-we-handle-humidity.html

    And here's a quote from the page:

    There are alternative water vapour management strategies out there. The best established one hails from Germany and it consists of fitting highly permeable materials to be used as a reservoir to store moisture, with a view to letting it be evaporated back inside when conditions allow. In Germany, it is seen as part of the Building Biology movement and they regard the use of humidity-buffering materials as one of their key principles. Needless to say, they regard the use of mechanical ventilation as an anathema.


    Also the Neil May paper linked above seems to concur with this.



    Posted By: nigelMy rough calc says about 0.21 for the walls and the roof is less good at 0.23.

    It would be better to make the roof better at the expense of the walls.

    I know you dont need to satisfy them but the roof would not satisfy building regs in the uk whereas the walls are well below building regs requirements.


    Thanks for the calculation Nigel. What would you recommend as a good way for use to improve the roof? (Hopefully compatible with the kind of approach described.)
    •  
      CommentAuthornigel
    • CommentTimeSep 11th 2007
     
    The biggest problem is the cold bridging of the rafters so you could go for something like 50mm of pavatex instead of the sarket board.

    http://www.natural-building.co.uk/ir.htm shows a detail you could use.

    This will reduce your u value to about 0.17
    • CommentAuthorRimu Homes
    • CommentTimeSep 13th 2007
     
    Hi Thomas,

    If the answer in this link is correct 11mm osb interally on your studs will serve a double purpose, Vapour barrier and racking strength.

    http://www.osbguide.com/faqs/faq11.html

    We currently use 9.5mm OSB but are looking into using 11mm instead, we still use a plastic barrier where f-floor panels tie in as this is a difficult area to seal.
  5.  
    Hi tomsusweb,

    have you thought about a strawbale house? it seems that this would achieve all your aims and for probably less cost and complexity
    earth render on the inside, which I agree with you makes an excellent hygroscopic ballast, and lime rendered on the outside.
    • CommentAuthortomsusweb
    • CommentTimeSep 14th 2007
     
    Thanks again for the comments. Strawbale was considered but a friend of ours has a strawbale house out here and is not happy that the bales are dry enough due to the very damp climate.

    The OSB and pavatex ideas sound good. I'll see if I can get an alternative softboard to pavatex that might be cheaper.
  6.  
    Re straw bale:

    I'm a strong proponent of this amazing material and have always advised clients with the simple build up of mud plaster on the inside and lime render outer, ,but recently after more study of 'breathing' wall systems am a bit concerned as clay is more vapour diffusive than lime render....

    SB seems to be performing ok in the field with this system, so perhaps something more complex is happening than a simple one way passage of vapour, maybe the store and release of water internally and externally is involved...

    j
  7.  
    PS

    has anyone come across 'thermowall' wood fibre board used without an air gap over a timber frame as a render sub base..?
  8.  
    Tony,
    Whilst I appreciate you thoughts, and Mr. B's research, humidity is only one part of the story. It the technique that you are proposing can achieve <50% RH then dust mites should, as I understand it, be reasonable control. The issue is indoor air quality. If you are trying to go sub 5m3/m2 @50pa then some form of assisted ventilation is well worth considering.

    Mark
Add your comments

    Username Password
  • Format comments as
 
   
The Ecobuilding Buzz
Site Map    |   Home    |   View Cart    |   Pressroom   |   Business   |   Links   
Logout    

© Green Building Press