Home  5  Books  5  GBEzine  5  News  5  HelpDesk  5  Register  5  GreenBuilding.co.uk
Not signed in (Sign In)

Categories



Green Building Bible, Fourth Edition
Green Building Bible, fourth edition (both books)
These two books are the perfect starting place to help you get to grips with one of the most vitally important aspects of our society - our homes and living environment.

PLEASE NOTE: A download link for Volume 1 will be sent to you by email and Volume 2 will be sent to you by post as a book.

Buy individually or both books together. Delivery is free!


powered by Surfing Waves




Vanilla 1.0.3 is a product of Lussumo. More Information: Documentation, Community Support.

Welcome to new Forum Visitors
Join the forum now and benefit from discussions with thousands of other green building fans and discounts on Green Building Press publications: Apply now.




    • CommentAuthorPFF
    • CommentTimeDec 4th 2016
     
    Hi

    First post to the forum after reading avidly for the last few months!

    We're going to install a wood burning boiler stove (arriving in a couple of weeks) to provide DHW and part of our heating needs. We've had great difficulties in getting a heating engineer to do the installation, or even advise us, so looks as though we may doing it ourselves with our very good builder (he's plumbed in boiler stoves before but by his own admission is no expert).

    We'd like to keep things as simple as possible so have tried to design a basic gravity fed system as shown in the attached schematic. The system is basically:

    -WBS with 20,000BTU (5.8kW) boiler on ground floor
    -Vented thermal store cylinder (just used for DHW) of around 170L on 1st floor almost directly above WBS (3m rise). This is directly fed from stove on 28mm pipe. Want to use a thermal store as opposed to a standard cylinder for mains pressure hot water via heat exchanger - but am open to advice as to it's suitability.
    -Two heat leak radiators in series with 22mm piping - one (2.5kW) on 1st floor landing about 6m away from cylinder (we can run pipes to it in a ground floor extension loft space so they can gradually rise). The pipe would then drop to a small (0.5kw) radiator in a utility room on the ground floor before returning to stove - again possible to keep the pipework descending all the way back to the stove.
    -A possible pumped radiator circuit to 1 or 2 other small radiators on 1st floor - this would be in case of the system overheating but also would be good to have option to turn pump on manually (see below).

    I just have a few questions about the system:

    1. Will it work as a gravity circuit? My thoughts are making the pipework to the cylinder 28mm will take priority over the 22mm pipework to the heat leak radiators so the cylinder will heat first. As the cylinder gets hotter more hot flow will head to the heat leak radiator loop on the narrower pipe work. We want to avoid using lots of pipe stats and motorised valves etc to direct the flow around - mainly for simplicity and that we get numerous power cuts here so be good to have a circuit that took care of itself.

    2. Can we use a single F&E tank for the whole circuit if we use a direct cylinder (i'm thinking something like the Gledhill Torrent ECO OV)?

    3. Where should the F&E tank feed the system? Most schematics just show it dropping in anywhere on the return pipe. One stove manafacturer told us we should feed the system at it's lowest point with a dog-leg in the pipe.

    4. Where shoud the pipe stats go for the pumped circuit? Some schematics show them on the flow from the stove and some on the return. Makes sense to me to be on the return as if the water is hot when returning to the stove then really need to be dissipating more heat.

    5. Can the pumped circuit be manually switched as well as controlled with pipe stats? Be good to have that option as may feed a bathroom radiator on the pumped circuit.

    6. Any details i've missed on my layout? I've seen non-return valves shown on some schematics but not sure if these are necessary on a gravity circuit. Similarly load valves and neutralisers - again not sure if they have any benefit or work on a gravity circuit?

    Would really appreciate some advice on this one as hope to be plumbing this in next month.

    Thanks in advance
      HeatingLayout03s.jpg
  1.  
    I would put an in an indirect DHW cylinder, and use a mains pressure indirect cylinder if you want mains pressure DHW. The stove and heating would still be vented. There may not be too much difference in cost once you factor in the heat exchanger. With an indirect DHW cylinder you get all the hot water as fast as you can remove it. With a heat exchanger the hot water id limited to the size of the heat exchanger.

    If you put everything on gravity the need for a loading valve (Laddomat and alike) or thermostats to manage the temperature maintenance on the stove goes away. Why not put the additional rads on gravity as well? And if you are depending upon the pump to give an over temperature 'safety feature' when you are subject to 'numerous power cuts' - life dictates that the need for the safety feature will only arise during a power cut!

    The fill part of the F&E would usually go to the low point as systems are best filled from bottom up although somewhere on the return pipe will work.

    You do not need to put the rads in series, parallel also works with due attention to pipe sizes and you get better heat output from what would have been the downstream rads

    You are missing a pressure relief valve at the stove output.

    The only reason the system would over heat is a malfunction by the person loading the wood!!! Wood stoves have to be run with sympathy to the functioning of the system. If the DHW tank is up to 85-90deg and the rads are all good and hot - you don't put more wood on! And experience will tell you how much wood you can put on for a given state of play.

    What are your plans for DHW outside of the heating season
    • CommentAuthorPFF
    • CommentTimeDec 5th 2016
     
    Thanks Peter...

    I had initially considered an indirect unvented cylinder (i'm assuming you mean unvented?) but had ruled it out after reading about not using an unvented cylinder with solid fuel systems (even though as you say the boiler and rads would still be vented) and that you're supposed to get them installed by specially registered plumbers, get annual checks, more chance they'll explode etc... - all put us off really.

    Good to hear loading valves/thermostats etc... not necessary on gravity circuits :)

    The additional rads will be at the other end of the house on the 1st floor and would prove tricky to feed on a gravity circuit as the pipework would have to go either up to the loft and back down, or horizontally for 5m under the floorboards. My understanding of gravity circuits is to keep the pipework gradually rising and falling. We are considering these extra rads as an option we may add later - we may find they're not required as the 2.5kW on the landing is enough to keep the upstairs warm enough for us.

    It's a good point about the pumped rads as a safety feature in event of power cut - we're hoping the gravity circuit is correctly sized so as the system never overheats. Like you say - the only way the system should overheat is if we load up too much wood.

    The rads are in series as the landing radiator is the priority - the utility room radiator is there just to keep the chill off in that room as it does suffer from a little damp.

    Now a pressure relief valve i didn't know about. I know we need a drain at the lowest point but i thought venting up to the F&E tank would deal with any excess pressure from overheating?

    DHW in summer will be provided by immersion. We plan to get solar PV with immersun type diverter sometime next year to take care of the summer requirements.
  2.  
    Posted By: PFFNow a pressure relief valve i didn't know about. I know we need a drain at the lowest point but i thought venting up to the F&E tank would deal with any excess pressure from overheating?

    venting up any excess pressure through the F&E works but for the small additional cost at installation time I always fit them. (I have seen frozen header tanks in lofts!)

    With your proposal I would install the 2 gravity rads without shut off valves so that they are always on.

    Posted By: PFFGood to hear loading valves/thermostats etc... not necessary on gravity circuits :)

    Gravity is self regulating. if the stove cools down (e.g. due to cold return coming back) the circulation stops, when the stove heats up again the circulation starts. The hotter the stove the faster the circulation. Actually to be correct the greater the difference between the stove and the load the faster the circulation. So without the rads if your tank was up to 90deg then you would get no circulation until the stove was in excess of 90deg. With the rads and the tank at say 80deg then if the stove was at 70 all the circulation would go through the rads until the stove got to 80+ when some heat will go to the tank. With the gravity system you propose the tank can not be cooled by the stove/heating circulation. Any heat in the tank will stay there until you draw hot water. With a pumped system (differential) thermostats are needed to stop the cooling of the tank when the tank temp. is higher than the rest of the system.

    Posted By: PFFI had initially considered an indirect unvented cylinder (i'm assuming you mean unvented?) but had ruled it out after reading about not using an unvented cylinder with solid fuel systems

    The reference to not using an unvented cylinder with solid fuel systems refers to the pressurising of the solid fuel system. with an indirect mains pressure DHW tank the solid fuel system is still vented. My DHW tank is mains pressure but is indirect and is heated by an internal coil from my thermal store which also runs the CH and is heated by a wood gasifying boiler. The boiler, thermal store, CH and tank coil are all vented. Only the hot water is mains pressure. I don't know if a mains pressure DHW tank comes under the same regs as a pressure tank, you would have to check the regs or ask a supplier or manufacture. (I have been out of the UK too long to keep up with the UK regs.).
    • CommentAuthorringi
    • CommentTimeDec 5th 2016
     
    Under the UK regs, unvented cylinder must have a safety thermostat that cuts off the heat source if it over heats, this must work even when there is no power (as as stove still gives heat). I think a spring operator value that only remains open while powered connected var the overheat thermostat is allowed, most unvented cylinders come with such a value.
    The overheat thermostat must not be auto resetting, so you have to press a button to reset it. You will therefore need an additional thermostat that controls an additional value set to a lower temperature so the unvented cylinder never gets close to tripping the safety thermostat.
    This has to be installed by someone with a G3 qualification, or checked by building control.
    (When heating the unvented cylinder from a thermal store, the pump can be wired var the safety thermostat.)
    • CommentAuthorringi
    • CommentTimeDec 5th 2016
     
    Remember that shower pumps work and don't cost that much...... So a normal vented DWH cylinder that costs less then a unvented cylinder can be used with a pump. However you can also build a platform in the loft for the cold water tank, as it is the height of the cold water tank over the shower that is important, not the height of the DHW tank.
  3.  
    ringi - thanks for clarifying the UK regs.

    Posted By: ringi(When heating the unvented cylinder from a thermal store, the pump can be wired var the safety thermostat.)

    Difficult to overheat an unvented cylinder from a thermal store. - I would hate to think of the state of the TS whilst you are overheating the TS - But I guess you still need the cut off.

    Posted By: ringiHowever you can also build a platform in the loft for the cold water tank, as it is the height of the cold water tank over the shower that is important

    But you have to include the whole lot within the heated envelope.
    • CommentAuthorPFF
    • CommentTimeDec 5th 2016
     
    Thanks again for all the extra info...

    I've just been looking through a number of cylinder manufacturers websites looking for an unvented indirect DHW tank that can accept input from a solid fuel boiler on a gravity circuit, but as yet not come across one. I've read the Megaflo Eco cylinders can accept solid fuel so long as 'appropriate safety measures are installed' - but then goes on to say it's not to be used with 'Gravity circulation primaries'.

    I'm certainly keen to look at this as an option as it does make sense - anyone know of a suitable cylinder. I guess it would need to have a 28mm coil to work effectively on gravity?

    A normal vented DHW cylinder is a possibility - would rather not have to pump to a shower but not ruled it out completely.
    •  
      CommentAuthordjh
    • CommentTimeDec 5th 2016
     
    Posted By: ringiRemember that shower pumps work and don't cost that much...... So a normal vented DWH cylinder that costs less then a unvented cylinder can be used with a pump. However you can also build a platform in the loft for the cold water tank, as it is the height of the cold water tank over the shower that is important, not the height of the DHW tank.

    Cold tanks in lofts don't give inspiring showers. Only mains pressure is usually good enough without a pump, if you're looking for a luxury feel.
    • CommentAuthorringi
    • CommentTimeDec 6th 2016
     
    We have the "quartz digital pumped shower" greet solution if you only need one shower in the property much better control then any normal shower - mains pressure or otherwise. Should cost no more then £500 including the shower head etc, remember you don't need to buy a separate shower mixer.
  4.  
    If you are fitting a thermal store, then you'd be taking the feed and return for the radiator circuit from the thermal store (except the overheat radiator).

    I'd suggest having the DHW via a heat exchange rather than a coil inside the cylinder. We have a heatbank and the solar PV in summer heats the water to 80C on a good day. The heat exchanger gives us mains pressure hot water at a set temperature with no risk of scalding. It's also drinkable, which is nice as there is no possibility of legionella and for those of us with sensitive teeth, it's nice to brush with lukewarm water ;)

    I don't know what the advantages of a pressurised system is, but ours is vented and we are happy with it. By the way, with a WBS you'll be wanting to fit a copper tank and copper ballcock in case you vent steam. Our copper feed/header tank came with the heatbank and has 50mm of foam fitted with a plastic outer casing. Not much chance of freezing.
    • CommentAuthorringi
    • CommentTimeDec 6th 2016 edited
     
    Posted By: Pile-o-StoneI'd suggest having the DHW via a heat exchange rather than a coil inside the cylinder. We have a heatbank and the solar PV in summer heats the water to 80C on a good day. The heat exchanger gives us mains pressure hot water at a set temperature with no risk of scalding. It's also drinkable, which is nice as there is no possibility of legionella and for those of us with sensitive teeth, it's nice to brush with lukewarm water ;)


    You can get the same by having a mixer on the output of a DHW coil. A plate heat exchange gives a higher peak flow rates then a coil, but also mixes the water up more in the store. Therefore if solar thermal is in use a coil running from the bottom to the top of the store is best, as it cools the water at the bottom of the store more, this is less of an issue with solar PV.

    Posted By: Pile-o-StoneI don't know what the advantages of a pressurised system is


    Lot of advantages on the flexibility of layout etc, but with a WBS I would rather be open vented so that "steaming" can be the last resort overheating protection system. (So no plastic pipes between the WBS and thermal store etc!)
    •  
      CommentAuthordjh
    • CommentTimeDec 6th 2016
     
    Posted By: ringiWe have the "quartz digital pumped shower" greet solution if you only need one shower in the property much better control then any normal shower - mains pressure or otherwise. Should cost no more then £500 including the shower head etc, remember you don't need to buy a separate shower mixer.

    Agreed they're brilliant. We had one in our last house and got a second one when we redid the bathroom, complete with bath filler. I might eventually get one or more of the unpumped versions for our new house, because as you say the control is so much better than a normal shower - no sudden hot or cold blips.
  5.  
    Posted By: Pile-o-StoneIf you are fitting a thermal store, then you'd be taking the feed and return for the radiator circuit from the thermal store (except the overheat radiator).

    In the diagram above the tank is 170ltrs which is DHW only. The rad circuit is designed for space heating which will only work when the stove is lit. A tank of 170ltr, in my book, can not be regarded as a thermal store.

    Posted By: Pile-o-StoneI'd suggest having the DHW via a heat exchange rather than a coil inside the cylinder.

    I would prefer to see - in preference order - 1) an indirect DHW tank either mains pressure or vented, 2) a direct tank with a heat exchange coil for DHW 3) a direct tank with a plate heat exchanger for DHW
    Plater heat exchangers need extra controls and require a pump to run to get hot water and mix up the stratification (especially on a small tank)
    •  
      CommentAuthordjh
    • CommentTimeDec 6th 2016
     
    Posted By: Pile-o-StoneIt's also drinkable, which is nice as there is no possibility of legionella

    Just to note that ours isn't drinkable, since we live in a hard water area and the water is softened.
    • CommentAuthorPFF
    • CommentTimeDec 6th 2016 edited
     
    Posted By: Peter_in_Hungary
    Posted By: Pile-o-StoneIf you are fitting a thermal store, then you'd be taking the feed and return for the radiator circuit from the thermal store (except the overheat radiator).

    In the diagram above the tank is 170ltrs which is DHW only. The rad circuit is designed for space heating which will only work when the stove is lit. A tank of 170ltr, in my book, can not be regarded as a thermal store.


    This is correct. We'd just be fitting a thermal store purely as a means of getting mains pressure DHW.

    Posted By: Peter_in_HungaryI would prefer to see - in preference order - 1) an indirect DHW tank either mains pressure or vented, 2) a direct tank with a heat exchange coil for DHW 3) a direct tank with a plate heat exchanger for DHW
    Plater heat exchangers need extra controls and require a pump to run to get hot water and mix up the stratification (especially on a small tank)


    Still looking into option 1 - indirect unvented mains pressure cylinder but can't find one suitable for a solid fuel stove on a gravity circuit. Maybe it's just a case that all manufacturers state you can't connect a solid fuel stove to an unvented cylinder - even though the stove would be vented?

    It seems there's differences of opinions on heat exchange coils against plate heat exchangers. I can see that plate heat exchangers are more complex in operation, but i've read give better results than a coil. Is stratification as important in a small tank directly fed from a stove and that's purely being used to supply DHW?
    • CommentAuthorringi
    • CommentTimeDec 6th 2016
     
    stratification can as much as double the amount of "useful" hot water you can take from your tank, but most tanks have too small a coil area to get very good stratification.

    The issue with gravity circuits and unvented mains pressure cylinder MAY be that the indirect coils in the tanks don't have enough height and have too great flow resistance for gravity to work in a dependable way. "tank in tank" may also be an option, as they have very low resistance for both the DWH and the heating water.
  6.  
    Posted By: PFFIs stratification as important in a small tank directly fed from a stove and that's purely being used to supply DHW?

    IMO yes because if you take heat out with a plate heat exchanger the pump pushes the primary water back into the tank with sufficient force/speed to mix what is in the tank. This has the effect of 'averaging' the temperature of the tank so after a bit instead of having say 80 at the top of the tank and 30 at the bottom you have 55 throughout. 80 is enough to produce hot water, 55 is not. (look at the plate HX spec. to see what temp you get with a 55deg primary) With a coil then the stratification stays so you still get 80 at the top, OK the coil has less distance at 80 after some usage, but if the coil is designed properly then you still get hot water (again look at the coil specs.). With an indirect tank (vented or otherwise) it is the water at the top of the tank that is used so when you have 80 deg top top bottom you get 80 deg hot water until you have used nearly all of the 80 deg water - in your case probably 130lts which you can/will/should mix down to 60deg which increases the available useable hot water. Hence my preference order above
Add your comments

    Username Password
  • Format comments as
 
   
The Ecobuilding Buzz
Site Map    |   Home    |   View Cart    |   Pressroom   |   Business   |   Links   
Logout    

© Green Building Press