Home  5  Books  5  GBEzine  5  News  5  HelpDesk  5  Register  5  GreenBuilding.co.uk
Not signed in (Sign In)

Categories



Green Building Bible, Fourth Edition
Green Building Bible, fourth edition (both books)
These two books are the perfect starting place to help you get to grips with one of the most vitally important aspects of our society - our homes and living environment.

PLEASE NOTE: A download link for Volume 1 will be sent to you by email and Volume 2 will be sent to you by post as a book.

Buy individually or both books together. Delivery is free!


powered by Surfing Waves




Vanilla 1.0.3 is a product of Lussumo. More Information: Documentation, Community Support.

Welcome to new Forum Visitors
Join the forum now and benefit from discussions with thousands of other green building fans and discounts on Green Building Press publications: Apply now.




    • CommentAuthorShevek
    • CommentTimeJun 28th 2014
     
    What do we think?
    http://www.threesixtyplumbing.co.uk/ecosoft-water-conditioner/
    http://www.threesixtyplumbing.co.uk/ecosoft/

    Warranty "for its useful life against deficiencies in material and workmanship".
    http://www.threesixtyplumbing.co.uk/wp-content/themes/360/images/photo/warranty.pdf

    Mind you I'd be more interested in a money back guarantee in the event that it doesn't work.
    • CommentAuthorShevek
    • CommentTimeJun 28th 2014 edited
     
    Actually this page says it does come with a "100% lifetime guarantee"

    "Because Ecosoft Water Conditioners have been proving themselves in Australia for over 30 years, never failing to deliver the results we claim, we can give you a cast iron guarantee. As long as you’ve correctly installed the right size conditioner for your home, you can be confident it won’t ever let you down."

    http://www.threesixtyplumbing.co.uk/ecosoft/how-it-works/

    Kind of dodgy how they stick Energy Savings Trust's logo on their website though. I can't see mention of Ecosoft's product on Energy Savings Trust's website.
  1.  
    These conditioners 'may' work while the water is moving for example with a combi boiler but what happens to the conditioned water if it's stored in a tank? The water hasn't been softened.
    • CommentAuthorShevek
    • CommentTimeJun 29th 2014
     
    Do you mean this kind of conditioning is temporary?

    (we have a combi)
    • CommentAuthorSprocket
    • CommentTimeJun 29th 2014
     
    The "How it works" brochure is mostly just a lot of pseudoscientific rubbish.
    Some real scientific terms in there but very wrong and incomplete use and not properly joined up. And no references for any of the claimed "tests". And they don't seem to understand what water softness is.

    They do not appear to have any evidence that it does actually work.
    Of course that doesn't prove it does not work but these are not good signs.
  2.  
    I used a well known water conditioner at my last house and it didn't stop scale in the kettle. It didn't reduce the amount of soap needed. Eventually I bought a salt based softener.
  3.  
    Hi Shevek et al,
    I’m from Threesixty who are the distributors for Ecosoft Water Conditioners and a colleague brought this thread to my attention, so rather than speculating answers (Sprocket) i’m really happy to answer them fully. In brief here but email me at info@ecosoftwater.co.uk for any more info you want at all.

    Yes it’s very new to the UK market so no-one really knows how it works yet over here, and there are lots of other units that look similar and simply don’t deliver the promised results, hence the natural cynicism which we understand.
    And i’m sorry you don’t like our brochure but it's certainly not psuedoscience, as we do have the full lab results to go with it, but they don’t make general reading for a domestic facing website - if you want them, please just ask. We do entirely understand what softness comprises of, and how it is calculated on the Saturation Index, and the part the Zeta Potential of water has to play in it all. We have aimed simply to provide a digestible overview not a detailed report for experts and nerds.

    As for the Energy Saving Trust logo, we most certainly do have permission to use it and Energy Trust don’t have anything like the corresponding links on their website to org’s that they work with. Our domestic website was sponsored by RegenSW because of its carbon saving potential, and this grant was from a fund comprised of the Energy Saving Trust, European funds and the others (i.e. the logos on the site) and we’re very proud of this.

    Ref, the point about stored/tanked water - the Ecosoft treats the water as it travels through and unlike most other units, the water stays treated for over 21 days with no reversion at all, the distance from the device makes no difference and nor does temperature. It requires no inputs (no electricity, no salts, no resins, no maintenance) and has no outputs other than entirely potable, limescale free, soft water.

    This device has been working in Oz for over 30 years in much harsher water than we have here, with just 3 returns (and one of those was that it was simply oversized) - hence being able to confidently offer such a strong warranty over here.

    I would be delighted to answer any further questions or concerns that anyone on this thread or elsewhere has, please do just ask.
    Kind regards Sam
    •  
      CommentAuthordjh
    • CommentTimeJun 30th 2014
     
    Posted By: EcosoftWateri’m sorry you don’t like our brochure but it's certainly not psuedoscience, as we do have the full lab results to go with it, but they don’t make general reading for a domestic facing website - if you want them, please just ask.

    Yes, please. Could you please post links to refereed papers in established journals?
    • CommentAuthorShevek
    • CommentTimeJun 30th 2014 edited
     
    Thanks for you response Samantha.

    Posted By: EcosoftWateri’m sorry you don’t like our brochure but it's certainly not psuedoscience, as we do have the full lab results to go with it, but they don’t make general reading for a domestic facing website - if you want them, please just ask.

    But a website is perfect for this sort of information. Having a link to lab results is not going to clutter a website. Having them available online allows people to link to them and discuss them. Which can lead to affirmation or holes being picked. So not having them available online is liable to make people think you're worried about the later.

    Posted By: EcosoftWaterAs for the Energy Saving Trust logo, we most certainly do have permission to use it and Energy Trust don’t have anything like the corresponding links on their website to org’s that they work with. Our domestic website was sponsored by RegenSW because of its carbon saving potential, and this grant was from a fund comprised of the Energy Saving Trust, European funds and the others (i.e. the logos on the site) and we’re very proud of this.

    Noted, thank you.

    Posted By: EcosoftWaterI would be delighted to answer any further questions or concerns that anyone on this thread or elsewhere has, please do just ask.

    Does Ecosoft eliminate or reduce limescale?

    With regard to the guarantee that it works, this is simply an offer to replace, repair or refund the device right? So who pays for all the damage to our plumbing system if it doesn't work? But presumably it works right, in which case you could offer a guarantee to replace any damage to our plumbing system not caused by faulty installation or use.
  4.  
    hello again,
    happy to answer the questions above in order for ease.
    djh - these reports were done by independent labs but for our purposes in the early days to prove effectiveness as such no, i cannot post the links to them as they were not for publication but..

    ...Shevek - yes that’s a good idea to put the links up and we will do that asap. The website is still in its infancy in the UK and whilst we do have plans to do lots more we are adding info and pages (but only enough not to drown, clutter and confuse people) as we go along. We have a number of reports which we will action putting links to, because as you say they won’t clutter the site. if you want them in the meantime, please just email me.

    The Ecosoft does both. The water that is treated as it turbulently goes over the alloy, ceases all further accumulation of limescale. Then as these galvanically treated mineral molecules come into contact with the established limescale, at a molecular level they convert their structure into their colloidal form and start to strip out the limescale present from the pipes. given the varied nature of limescale we cannot give any firm indication as to the timescale that this will take but we are seeking significant results in a few months on systems installed here. As such it eliminates limescale - however, a word of caution as i’m sure you’re already aware, in any system where there is a very high level of calcium, the water is often unable to remove all the calcium particles and as such a white dust or silt may remain - but this does not stick/precipitate and as such can be wiped away with ease, and is a calcium residue not limescale.

    Guarantee - i’m sorry but that’s a disingenuous comment. no product, no system anywhere has an unlimited warranty, that would be profoundly stupid thing to do for any business given the vast array of things that are outside of your control. We are secure in the powerful effectiveness of our product and as such we give a 100% warranty as to its manufacture (any fault = replacement, as you confirm above) but also we guarantee its results and no other product (that i’m aware of) does that, and we do that for the lifetime of the unit, which given its manufacture and materials will outlive pretty much all of us on this forum - which we think is probably enough.

    again hope this helps
    best, Sam
    • CommentAuthorShevek
    • CommentTimeJul 1st 2014 edited
     
    Posted By: EcosoftWaterGuarantee - i’m sorry but that’s a disingenuous comment. no product, no system anywhere has an unlimited warranty, that would be profoundly stupid thing to do for any business given the vast array of things that are outside of your control. We are secure in the powerful effectiveness of our product and as such we give a 100% warranty as to its manufacture (any fault = replacement, as you confirm above) but also we guarantee its results and no other product (that i’m aware of) does that, and we do that for the lifetime of the unit, which given its manufacture and materials will outlive pretty much all of us on this forum - which we think is probably enough.

    There's nothing particularly explicit about results in your guarantee. It states explicitly at the beginning that it's a guarantee against "deficiencies in material and workmanship":
    http://www.threesixtyplumbing.co.uk/wp-content/themes/360/images/photo/warranty.pdf

    Is this the paragraph that covers the guarantee of results?
    Should this product, in Eco-Soft Water’s opinion, fail to be in good working order during the
    warranty period, Eco-Soft Water will, at its option, repair or replace this product at freight only
    charge, provided that the product has not been subjected to abuse, misuse, accident, disaster or
    non Eco-Soft Water authorized modification or repair.

    I'd be more confident if this was more explicit.

    I also note this paragraph:
    NOTE: Under no circumstances will Eco-Soft Water be liable in any way for damages, including
    any lost profits, lost savings or other incidental or consequential damages arising out of the use
    of, or inability to use, such product.

    I don't think you can legally make this claim in the UK. If a product injures someone or damages something, the manufacturer (or the importer) is responsible, under the Consumer Protection Act 1987.
    • CommentAuthorSprocket
    • CommentTimeJul 1st 2014
     
    I look forward to seeing the lab results and more detail of what testing was done. I hope you will post the links on your web site (or in this forum) so that a few of us can easily see and discuss.

    I'm sorry if you don't like the term but the brochure _is_ pseudoscience... unscientific explanations and lack of real info dressed up with terms that may appear to non-scientists as evidence of scientific process.

    For example:-

    "The turbulence generated in the Eco-SoftWater Conditioner® creates an Electro-Chemical (galvanic) reaction between the crystalline minerals in the water and the catalytic alloy core".


    But, benefit of the doubt etc, I suppose this could just be a result of dumbing down the science to something easier to explain to a novice. There is so much of this kind of thing out there that I think we are understandably a bit cynical.

    I would certainly welcome some more detailed information.
    • CommentAuthorShevek
    • CommentTimeJul 1st 2014
     
    Posted By: SprocketThere is so much of this kind of thing out there that I think we are understandably a bit cynical.

    Ditto. And the last thing I want is a salt-based water softener so as much as I appear hostile I'm really hoping this is the real mccoy.
    • CommentAuthordaserra
    • CommentTimeJul 1st 2014
     
    "The turbulence generated in the Eco-SoftWater Conditioner® creates an Electro-Chemical (galvanic) reaction between the crystalline minerals in the water and the catalytic alloy core".

    That sounds like the catalyst causes the dissolved metals to come out of solution and precipitate, possibly oxidisation. I've had fun with this in swimming pools, especially with oxalic acid. (calcium oxalate).
    •  
      CommentAuthordjh
    • CommentTimeJul 2nd 2014
     
    Posted By: daserraThat sounds like the catalyst causes the dissolved metals to come out of solution and precipitate

    Well no, they say that it causes the limescale components to form colloids that don't precipitate. Limescale is precipitation after all, and is exactly what we don't want.

    Israelachvili, I say! :devil:
  5.  
    Hi there,

    Ok, let me try and and answer these again in order. and i’ll try and be a bit briefer! if i don’t fully answer your question its not that i’m trying to avoid it, i’ve just misunderstood so please ask me again.

    Guarantee - ok, i already have the legal team checking that its all legally correct for the UK and that we do protect our customers but that we also don’t leave ourselves wide open to abuse, and that includes the Consumer Protection Act but my understanding of that is that we cannot protect against injury to persons not to property - either way it will comply fully and thanks for providing feedback now, because now is the time we need to get this fine tuned and making sense for customers.
    So the intent, which if it doesn’t say it now it will, is that the customer has a 100% warranty on the manufacture and material - any defects in that and we replace the unit. Regarding the efficacy, we say in our literature that it will remove and prevent all future limescale, indefinitely, and that is what the warranty’s second purpose is to deliver. So if limescale (not calcium silt) should appear again, then the warranty will cover that - its never been claimed on so far! We’ll look at making this more explicit in the warranty details but that is our intention.

    Ok, pseudoscience it is not, and the terms used are entirely correct but we have had to adjust them a bit to make them more digestible and so they do need read as they do in the tech report - and this may be what you are picking up on. i don’t think saying that we “flocculate the minerals into their colloidal form’ and so forth generally works for our average domestic customer.

    And i’m afraid i can’t see technically how i can get this info to you quickly other than by email as the website is designed to drive sales,and it does this partly by getting people to fill in the form to seek more detailed info - i’m not getting into a discussion here about the rights and wrongs of our marketing strategy, but this does mean that we are happy to forward to the info to folk who have contacted us, but not to lose this incentive but putting this level of tech detail up on the website. if anyone has any other ideas how i can share the reports with you without swamping this thread please let me know and i’ll do my best, i’m afraid the IT side of things is not more forte.

    However, this is an excerpt from our report;
    Several key occurrences take place which bring about the colloidal formation;
    • The alloy core provides an immediate galvanic site upon which the ions can deposit.
    • The minerals are attracted and repelled several hundred times before clearing the alloy core.
    • Electrons are being captured from the water into the core and dispersed from the core back into the water, there is a very definite cathode-anode galvanic action.
    • Nuclei have been introduced into the system as a result of the cathode-anode reaction and provide a more positive site around which the mineral particles can attract, as opposed to precipitating onto the walls of piping or equipment. The scientific name for this reaction is more readily known as “epitaxial nucleation”.
    • The Zeta potential and surface tension of the water is reduced.

    Again my email address is info@ecosoftwater.co.uk if someone here wants to get the reports to comment for others?

    djh - thanks, your comments answering daserra’s point are spot on, even if i have no idea what ‘Israelachvili’ is ! and this unit is doing great work in numerous swimming pools in Oz, and we’re hoping to fit one in Cyprus shortly.

    and i completely get the cynicism given what else is out there, but i’d just say again that this has been delivering impeccable results across Australia for over 30 years, and if it can cope with their water it can certainly cope with ours.

    btw - if i don’t answer q’s before mid next week its because i’m on hols for a few days. (you’ve exhausted me!)

    Best
    Sam:bigsmile:
    • CommentAuthorSprocket
    • CommentTimeJul 3rd 2014 edited
     
    > Ok, pseudoscience it is not

    I must insist, it quite definitely is pretty much a text-book example of pseudoscience.

    It's just not worth going through everything you have said point by point. It's such wrong use of "scientific" terms that I don't know where to start. Some of it is even very self contradictory.

    To take another random example, from the report quote there:-

    > Electrons are being captured from the water into the core and dispersed from the core
    > back into the water, there is a very definite cathode-anode galvanic action.

    Is this really a scientific report?
    No-one with any kind of scientific background could honestly say something like that.
    It's just more pseudo science. It's not just impossible. It is nonsense.

    The first example completely mis-uses terms like catalytic, galvanic, and electrochemical in ways that are very self contradictory. Galvanic would imply corrosion/sacrifice of some of the metal in the device. So does electrochemical. Catalytic implies it is not changed and yet a catalyst can only accelerate a chemical reaction that would happen spontaneously anyway; it cannot cause a reaction that would not otherwise occur nor can it reverse or alter the 'normal' process.

    And the web site's use of Zeta Potential is quite wrong - it has things backwards.
    There is plenty more wrong though.
    • CommentAuthorSprocket
    • CommentTimeJul 3rd 2014 edited
     
    This appears to be the same device that was previously called "Turbu-Flow"? Sold extensively in Australia?
    Now sold in Australia by Pilbara Water as eco-softwater
    Originally from Bauer Energy Design (their latest thing is nano-bubble water conditioners).

    There are many other such devices on the market. Most have been debunked by others. Some electronic, some magnetic but also a good few "Catalytic" using special alloys and mysterious galvanic effects.
    There is no need to just take my (BSc Biochemist) word on any of this though, a big list containing some of these devices (including the Turbu Flow) is here on Steve Lower's site. Steve is a well respected and qualified Bio and Physical chemist.

    http://www.chem1.com/CQ
    http://www.chem1.com/CQ/gallery.html

    and some more scientific info/viewpoint here

    http://www.chem1.com/CQ/catscams.html
    • CommentAuthorShevek
    • CommentTimeJul 3rd 2014 edited
     
    I emailed you asking for the reports Samantha but it said you were away until 9th July and I haven't had a response.

    Posted By: EcosoftWaterAnd i’m afraid i can’t see technically how i can get this info to you quickly other than by email as the website is designed to drive sales,and it does this partly by getting people to fill in the form to seek more detailed info

    When a company doesn't openly provide evidence via their website that their (contentious) product works as designed, all it says to me (and probably most people) is that the evidence probably doesn't stack up. So the only way it can be a good marketing strategy to withhold that information from easy consumption is that the evidence indeed does not stack up.
    • CommentAuthorShevek
    • CommentTimeJul 3rd 2014
     
    Great website Sprocket, thanks.
    •  
      CommentAuthordjh
    • CommentTimeJul 3rd 2014
     
    Posted By: ShevekWhen a company doesn't openly provide evidence via their website that their (contentious) product works as designed, all it says to me (and probably most people) is that the evidence probably doesn't stack up.

    Exactly, and getting on the mailing list of a (possibly) dodgy company is the last thing I want.

    Samantha, you are apparently unable to use the web effectively yourself, since you had to ask what SWMBO meant. And you are apparently not an expert in surface science yourself if you don't know who Israelachvili is. Before giving my email address to a company I like to see evidence that there are competent staff implementing the security, and before believing scientific statements, I like to see evidence that they are made by scientifically-trained people. So is there somebody (or somebodies) in your company who could answer those concerns and respond to the questions that people here have raised?
    • CommentAuthorShevek
    • CommentTimeJul 7th 2014
     
    Did anyone manage to get the lab reports emailed to them?
  6.  
  7.  
    The reviews on reviewcentre.com don't seem that good for the Monarch Scaleout.
    • CommentAuthorShevek
    • CommentTimeAug 5th 2014 edited
     
    Received the reports.

    Excerpt from email:
    As for the the lauded site from Steve Lowther, I’m afraid that the paucity of evidence in the tables presented there rather begs the question on what he bases his opinions. As such I suggest that the references on the Forum to our data being pseudoscience are somewhat laughable.

    However, please find attached the lab and field reports. Whilst the lab reports are somewhat dated there has been no need to update them as the product has remained the same and continued to deliver its results to over 30 years worth of customers, and as such we are happy to work with the fact that the units simply do deliver what they claim to. And we guarantee that, which no-one else does which I think speaks for itself.

    So feel free to have a go at the reports or whatever else you wish, I will continue to sell the units to those individuals who are more interested in solutions than an arguments.


    Effects of Turbu-Flow on Calcium Carbonate - Bernard Daigle -3
    https://www.dropbox.com/s/cwauh0oq3vf5mnp/Effects%20of%20Turbu-Flow%20on%20Calcium%20Carbonate%20-%20Bernard%20Daigle%20-3.pdf
    •  
      CommentAuthorSteamyTea
    • CommentTimeAug 5th 2014 edited
     
    Oh how I wish I understood chemistry more.
    Not sure, but do those reports actually say anything other than there did not seem to be any significant build up of scale after 15 months?

    I wonder how many they have sold in Aylesbury, I know how hard the water is there.
    • CommentAuthorSprocket
    • CommentTimeAug 6th 2014 edited
     
    There is no science in any of those 'reports'. They are just more pseudoscience; a phenomenon that has nothing to do with Steve Lower's "opinions". It was clearly pseudo science before we read Steve's views. It is not pseudoscience because anyone thinks so, it is just what it is.

    It is unfortunate that so many people are mislead into thinking something represents scientific work just because of the use of a few scientific sounding words.

    None of the researchers correctly reference their qualifications or associated organisations. They show no methodology or information about how measurements were taken and thus there is no indication of expected precision or reliability in the results. They have no sensible experimental controls. Data is presented in a most unscientific way. They make no attempt to isolate what they are trying to measure from other effects. There is no analysis of statistical significance of results. There is no analysis of repeatability to compare naturally occurring variance. They jump to conclusions when they see (or mostly infer) correlation. And they list no references at all.

    The first document admits they had only a single sample of each water type (treated vs untreated) that was delivered from outside. The writer's understanding of the effect of Zeta potential on colloids is also clearly wrong (reducing zeta potential would destabilise a suspended colloid - the opposite of what is claimed). This document is littered with nonsense and plainly incorrect science. There is use of other work (eg. the SEM photographs) yet no sign of credit or reference even though conclusions are derived from these works. The written conclusion at the end is also more unscientific nonsense. It even makes incredible new claims for the capabilities of Turbu-flow.... that the treated water is an excellent disinfectant! A 5/6/7 order reduction in bacterial count is way better than commercial UV treatment systems (which are usually 4-order reduction) and would probably save many millions of pounds in power consumption at swimming pools and waste water treatment in the UK alone.

    The second document is only two very short pages but at least it explains what methods and equipment were used to conduct the examination. It is however just a very simple test of water flow through a <2yr old water heater and a visual inspection carried out by an architect who concludes that it appears to be working and in good condition.

    The third document is a mere half a page that claims "a dramatic decrease in water surface tension after a single pass through the Turbu-Flow unit". Two samples only of water were produced (one treated, one not) and shipped to another lab for analysis just once. The surface tension of one water sample is listed as about 12% lower than the other (ie. hardly dramatic). There is no conclusion, just a rather strange statement that treated water "exhibits a surface tension that is similar in magnitude to water that has been heated to 80 degrees C". There is no indication as to why the surface tension is measured, how it is measured, who measured it, how precisely it is measured, how significant the data is, or what the results might mean or what other measurements should be done to clarify or improve this "experiment".

    None of this looks like science to me.
    They are currently selling these in Bristol. The water here is very hard.
    We are all more interested in solutions that arguments. We are also interested in making sure that hundreds of pounds spent on a mysterious water-softening device are actually well spent and will make a big difference. Personally I am not convinced.
    • CommentAuthorShevek
    • CommentTimeAug 6th 2014
     
    Thanks Sprocket.
  8.  
    Hello,
    Its taken us a little while, but I thought you might like to know that all the technical reports that we spoke of, and were linked to above, are now available on our Commercial website on the About Us page.
    I am not going to address any of the points above in Sprockets note as there are too many which are incorrect and because i have addressed most of them in the earlier thread.

    I am confident that most Forum readers will be able to read the website information, the numerous testimonials, the Perth Housing Authority independent test and other material and i trust reach their own conclusions.

    We are currently exploring having the units tested again at a UK university, simply for the purpose of having a UK test for UK customers. Once this is in place, which may be some time, we will let this thread know so that you can check that out too.
    Best
    Sam
Add your comments

    Username Password
  • Format comments as
 
   
The Ecobuilding Buzz
Site Map    |   Home    |   View Cart    |   Pressroom   |   Business   |   Links   
Logout    

© Green Building Press