Green Building Bible, Fourth Edition |
![]() |
These two books are the perfect starting place to help you get to grips with one of the most vitally important aspects of our society - our homes and living environment. PLEASE NOTE: A download link for Volume 1 will be sent to you by email and Volume 2 will be sent to you by post as a book. |
Vanilla 1.0.3 is a product of Lussumo. More Information: Documentation, Community Support.
Posted By: alexeixI considered an MVHR system, but it would require substantial changes inside the property, including boxing in of pipework, so it’s not suitable.I think it would be worth exploring that further, if you provide more details & perhaps a sketch.
Posted By: alexeixWe seem to be left with adding individual heat recovery ventilation units in rooms (probably not all), but I’d like to get some feedback from people who are using them.I've not used them, except a single one in a single-space building some years ago.
Posted By: tonyMVHR should be possible upstairs
PIV should be illegal as although it works it also pushes warmed air out of the house increasing energy use!
Posted By: WillInAberdeenDucted fans (central MHRV system) have to overcome a lot more backpressure, due to all the ducts and valves, than single-room MHRV do or push-pull MHRV or PIV. So in principle, ducted MHRV uses more electricity than those.I agree ducted MVHR has to cope with the back pressure created by the ducts. But it doesn't have to cope with back pressure caused by the increased pressure within the house that a PIV system or a push-pull system does. Nor does it have to cope with the loss of heat expelled in the air the PIV forces out. MVHR systems publish their fan consumption and I think it will be hard to find a single one that is worse than any PIV system.
Posted By: cjard"Does MVHR system use 10 times the energy of a PIV to run so not any better in the round?"
Why would two fans cost ten times what one fan does?
Posted By: alexeixRegarding the design, we may be able to fit MVHR with only one section of ducting passing down from the loft area to the ceiling of the ground floor.Sounds promising
Posted By: alexeixDoes the actual heat exchanger unit need to be centrally located?The aim is to keep the external air supply and exhaust ducts as short as possible and very well insulated (both will carry very cold air in winter), with their vents on the same elevation. So the exchanger probably won't be central.
Posted By: alexeixthere is artex on a number of the ceilings and it’s old, so I suspect it may contain asbestos.If it does, you can buy Artex removal gels, allowing you to remove the Artex where you need to cut without creating dust.
Posted By: alexeixWill try to upload a sketch when I can figure out how. ðŸ˜Keeping the tiny is the key - from memory I think the limit is 50 kB?
Posted By: alexeixDoes the actual heat exchanger unit need to be centrally located?No, it is normal to mount them somewhere that is close to an outside wall or roof, such that the intake and exhaust ducts will be short. As Mike said.
we’d probably need to box in ducting running up to the loft conversion ceilingWe don't have any vents on the ceiling upstairs. They're all in the internal stud walls or are floor vents where they needed to be in a corner next to an outside wall (we had a golden rule of NO penetrations in the outside wall, except the two main ducts and doors and windows). (and then broke the rule with plumbing for an outside tap, and wiring for outside lights
Posted By: Mike1I think it's 500 kB.Posted By: alexeixWill try to upload a sketch when I can figure out how. ðŸ˜Keeping the tiny is the key - from memory I think the limit is 50 kB?
Posted By: alexeix
Does the actual heat exchanger unit need to be centrally located
1 to 15 of 15