Home  5  Books  5  GBEzine  5  News  5  HelpDesk  5  Register  5  GreenBuilding.co.uk
Not signed in (Sign In)

Categories



Green Building Bible, Fourth Edition
Green Building Bible, fourth edition (both books)
These two books are the perfect starting place to help you get to grips with one of the most vitally important aspects of our society - our homes and living environment.

PLEASE NOTE: A download link for Volume 1 will be sent to you by email and Volume 2 will be sent to you by post as a book.

Buy individually or both books together. Delivery is free!


powered by Surfing Waves




Vanilla 1.0.3 is a product of Lussumo. More Information: Documentation, Community Support.

Welcome to new Forum Visitors
Join the forum now and benefit from discussions with thousands of other green building fans and discounts on Green Building Press publications: Apply now.




    • CommentAuthoralexeix
    • CommentTimeJan 31st 2023
     
    Hi,

    I live in a 1950s semi, which I am going to be extending (awaiting a decision on planning).
    Most of the original, external walls will be subject to the extension and therefore the new external walls will be properly insulated, however, most of the front of the house and one part of the rear upstairs will remain original.
    Bizarrely, the house has almost no cavity, so I’m looking at internal or external insulation panels for the relevant areas.

    The house is quite humid, which has caused some mould growth, so I’m now ventilating twice a day by opening all windows for about 10 mins and running a dehumidifier when the windows are closed.

    Therefore, I’m going to need to fit some kind of automated ventilation.
    I considered an MVHR system, but it would require substantial changes inside the property, including boxing in of pipework, so it’s not suitable.
    We also know peoples who have recently fitted a PIV system and they said the incoming air is cold, so we want to avoid that.

    We seem to be left with adding individual heat recovery ventilation units in rooms (probably not all), but I’d like to get some feedback from people who are using them.

    Does anyone here have these things and are they any good?
    How much noise do they make?
    Recommended brands?

    Thanks!
    • CommentAuthorMike1
    • CommentTimeJan 31st 2023 edited
     
    Posted By: alexeixI considered an MVHR system, but it would require substantial changes inside the property, including boxing in of pipework, so it’s not suitable.
    I think it would be worth exploring that further, if you provide more details & perhaps a sketch.

    Posted By: alexeixWe seem to be left with adding individual heat recovery ventilation units in rooms (probably not all), but I’d like to get some feedback from people who are using them.
    I've not used them, except a single one in a single-space building some years ago.

    However the biggest problem is if you install them on different walls of the house - that tends to convert your house into a wind-tunnel.
    • CommentAuthortony
    • CommentTimeJan 31st 2023
     
    MVHR should be possible upstairs

    PIV should be illegal as although it works it also pushes warmed air out of the house increasing energy use!
    • CommentAuthorJonti
    • CommentTimeJan 31st 2023
     
    Posted By: tonyMVHR should be possible upstairs

    PIV should be illegal as although it works it also pushes warmed air out of the house increasing energy use!


    I don't know so will ask. Does MVHR system use 10 times the energy of a PIV to run so not any better in the round?
    • CommentAuthorcjard
    • CommentTimeFeb 1st 2023
     
    "PIV should be illegal as although it works it also pushes warmed air out of the house increasing energy use!"

    Yeah, but so do trickle vents, notionally.. Prrhaps one day we won't have to put up with such medievality as standard
    • CommentAuthorcjard
    • CommentTimeFeb 1st 2023
     
    "Does MVHR system use 10 times the energy of a PIV to run so not any better in the round?"

    Why would two fans cost ten times what one fan does?
  1.  
    Ducted fans (central MHRV system) have to overcome a lot more backpressure, due to all the ducts and valves, than single-room MHRV do or push-pull MHRV or PIV. So in principle, ducted MHRV uses more electricity than those.

    But in practice, a very wide range of quality is available, with some (very expensive) fans consuming much less electricity than some other (very cheap) ones.

    So overall: it depends.

    Here was another discussion about how to retrofit Mhrv without fitting ducts everywhere
    http://www.greenbuildingforum.co.uk/newforum/comments.php?DiscussionID=17632&Focus=298694#Comment_298694
    •  
      CommentAuthordjh
    • CommentTimeFeb 1st 2023
     
    Posted By: WillInAberdeenDucted fans (central MHRV system) have to overcome a lot more backpressure, due to all the ducts and valves, than single-room MHRV do or push-pull MHRV or PIV. So in principle, ducted MHRV uses more electricity than those.
    I agree ducted MVHR has to cope with the back pressure created by the ducts. But it doesn't have to cope with back pressure caused by the increased pressure within the house that a PIV system or a push-pull system does. Nor does it have to cope with the loss of heat expelled in the air the PIV forces out. MVHR systems publish their fan consumption and I think it will be hard to find a single one that is worse than any PIV system.
  2.  
    Quick Google, first hits:

    Vent axia PIV : 6.5W at 29l/s "Pozidry"

    Vent axia dMEV : 3.5W at 29l/s "Lo carbon NBR" (2 units required)

    Vent axia MHRV : 27W at 29l/s "Sentinel Kinetic B/BH vertical spigots"

    So their MHRV uses several times more electricity than their PIV or dMEV for the same ventilation rate.


    Obviously none of those are a lot of power consumption, in the scheme of things. And there are many other suppliers and models . And many other factors, such as: energy and carbon value of the heat recovered by the MHRV and avoided cost of heaters to supply it; cost and practicality of fitting ducts; ability to control the air flow rate to the rooms that need it at the times when they need it; noise; space taken up, unit cost, reliability, maintenance, filtration, discomfort of cold air supply, etc etc etc


    So overall: it depends.
    • CommentAuthorJonti
    • CommentTimeFeb 1st 2023
     
    Posted By: cjard"Does MVHR system use 10 times the energy of a PIV to run so not any better in the round?"

    Why would two fans cost ten times what one fan does?


    I don't know myself, it was just something a basic google search threw up. However, I suspect that WiA is correct. The alternative low energy system is someone opening a window to air the place.
    • CommentAuthoralexeix
    • CommentTimeFeb 2nd 2023
     
    <blockquote><cite>Posted By: Mike1</cite><blockquote><cite>Posted By: alexeix</cite>I considered an MVHR system, but it would require substantial changes inside the property, including boxing in of pipework, so it’s not suitable.</blockquote>I think it would be worth exploring that further, if you provide more details & perhaps a sketch.

    Thanks for the feedback - interesting to read your comment about the wind tunnel effect.

    Regarding the design, we may be able to fit MVHR with only one section of ducting passing down from the loft area to the ceiling of the ground floor.
    However, this throws up another potential issue, because the only available loft space will be in the extension added on to the back of the house.
    Does the actual heat exchanger unit need to be centrally located?

    Another issue is that there is artex on a number of the ceilings and it’s old, so I suspect it may contain asbestos.
    I’ll get it tested to be certain, but if it is, I won’t want to be cutting holes through the ceiling.
    Hence why I’m interested in room specific units.

    To cover all the bases, I’m going to lift the carpets and check which way the joists run on the first floor, because that will also affect our ability to do a full MVHR retrofit.

    Will try to upload a sketch when I can figure out how. 😁
    • CommentAuthoralexeix
    • CommentTimeFeb 2nd 2023
     
    Just to add, we’re also converting our existing loft to make another bedroom, hence why the heat exchanger unit of an MVHR system would need to go in the new loft (above the extension).

    The new loft won’t be connected to the loft conversion, so we’d probably need to box in ducting running up to the loft conversion ceiling.
    • CommentAuthorMike1
    • CommentTimeFeb 2nd 2023 edited
     
    Posted By: alexeixRegarding the design, we may be able to fit MVHR with only one section of ducting passing down from the loft area to the ceiling of the ground floor.
    Sounds promising

    Posted By: alexeixDoes the actual heat exchanger unit need to be centrally located?
    The aim is to keep the external air supply and exhaust ducts as short as possible and very well insulated (both will carry very cold air in winter), with their vents on the same elevation. So the exchanger probably won't be central.

    Posted By: alexeixthere is artex on a number of the ceilings and it’s old, so I suspect it may contain asbestos.
    If it does, you can buy Artex removal gels, allowing you to remove the Artex where you need to cut without creating dust.

    Posted By: alexeixWill try to upload a sketch when I can figure out how. 😁
    Keeping the tiny is the key - from memory I think the limit is 50 kB?
    •  
      CommentAuthordjh
    • CommentTimeFeb 2nd 2023
     
    Posted By: alexeixDoes the actual heat exchanger unit need to be centrally located?
    No, it is normal to mount them somewhere that is close to an outside wall or roof, such that the intake and exhaust ducts will be short. As Mike said.

    we’d probably need to box in ducting running up to the loft conversion ceiling
    We don't have any vents on the ceiling upstairs. They're all in the internal stud walls or are floor vents where they needed to be in a corner next to an outside wall (we had a golden rule of NO penetrations in the outside wall, except the two main ducts and doors and windows). (and then broke the rule with plumbing for an outside tap, and wiring for outside lights :bigsmile: )

    Posted By: Mike1
    Posted By: alexeixWill try to upload a sketch when I can figure out how. 😁
    Keeping the tiny is the key - from memory I think the limit is 50 kB?
    I think it's 500 kB.
  3.  
    Posted By: alexeix
    Does the actual heat exchanger unit need to be centrally located


    No it doesn’t. You only aim for that to reduce the length of the multiple pipe runs and therefore the cost. Rooms that are furthest away could have 2 x pipes going to the extract and/or supply plenum (if using flexible semi-rigid duct)
Add your comments

    Username Password
  • Format comments as
 
   
The Ecobuilding Buzz
Site Map    |   Home    |   View Cart    |   Pressroom   |   Business   |   Links   
Logout    

© Green Building Press